Two More From The 12 Apostles
Posted: Mon Feb 13, 2006 2:50 pmTwo more of the 12 Apostles:
Comments welcome
Paul
Comments welcome
Paul
DSLRUsers.com
A discussion forum - and more - for users of Digital Single Lens Reflex cameras.
https://www.dslrusers.com/
Two More From The 12 Apostles
Page 1 of 1
Posted: Mon Feb 13, 2006 2:50 pmPosted: Mon Feb 13, 2006 2:58 pmGreat stuff Paul # 2 is great
Posted: Mon Feb 13, 2006 3:13 pmFantastic Paul, I love number 1 in particular. Exceptional.
I wonder when an audit of these piles of sandstone will be conducted and the whole
thing renamed to reflect the true position - i.e. they are not apostles and there aren't twelve.
I wonder when an audit of these piles of sandstone will be conducted and the whole
thing renamed to reflect the true position - i.e. they are not apostles and there aren't twelve.
Posted: Mon Feb 13, 2006 4:51 pmThank you for the comments...
On a side note... does anyone know when all twelve were standing? If there were ever 12 that is.
Paul
On a side note... does anyone know when all twelve were standing? If there were ever 12 that is.
Paul
Posted: Mon Feb 13, 2006 4:55 pmI don't believe there was 12 to begin with, unsure if there was less or more originally but pretty sure it was not a 'literal naming'.
I like both shots, the first is great, lovely mood to it, the sky tones are great.
With the second, I love the light on the rocks but its a shame about the shadow of the cliff on the outcrop.. had it been taken earlier the shadow might not have been so distracting but the light would of been different as well.
I like both shots, the first is great, lovely mood to it, the sky tones are great.
With the second, I love the light on the rocks but its a shame about the shadow of the cliff on the outcrop.. had it been taken earlier the shadow might not have been so distracting but the light would of been different as well.
Posted: Mon Feb 13, 2006 5:00 pmHmm... interesting. Will have to look up more on the history of these rocks.
To get rid of the shadow I would have had to taken the shot later (this is a morning shot).
Paul
To get rid of the shadow I would have had to taken the shot later (this is a morning shot).
Paul
Posted: Mon Feb 13, 2006 5:02 pmNikonUser wrote:Hmm... interesting. Will have to look up more on the history of these rocks.
To get rid of the shadow I would have had to taken the shot later (this is a morning shot).
Paul
Arh my Sony, never been interstate, so I'm completely disorientated when looking at the shot.
Posted: Mon Feb 13, 2006 6:17 pmHi Paul,
I've been really enjoying your GOR series, wonderful images, beautiful light, looks like you had a great trip.
They were renamed in the 50's, they used to be named Sow and Piglet, not to enticing for visitors it seems
It bit of history:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Twelve ... ,_Victoria
thanks for sharing Paul,
Andre
I've been really enjoying your GOR series, wonderful images, beautiful light, looks like you had a great trip.
Greg B wrote:I wonder when an audit of these piles of sandstone will be conducted and the whole
thing renamed to reflect the true position - i.e. they are not apostles and there aren't twelve.
They were renamed in the 50's, they used to be named Sow and Piglet, not to enticing for visitors it seems
It bit of history:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Twelve ... ,_Victoria
thanks for sharing Paul,
Andre
Posted: Mon Feb 13, 2006 7:17 pmAndre, I like number 2 the best
Posted: Mon Feb 13, 2006 8:28 pmStunning..........
Posted: Mon Feb 13, 2006 8:36 pmFantastic images, Paul. I love No. 2
Alex
Alex
Posted: Mon Feb 13, 2006 8:56 pmTwo fanatastic images Paul and fine examples of the different moods possible at the 12 apostles. Beautiful captures of very contrasting images that sit well together.
cheers
marco
cheers
marco
Posted: Mon Feb 13, 2006 9:02 pmThose two pics were only taken just over an hour apart.
Shows how quickly light can change.
Paul
Shows how quickly light can change.
Paul