Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.
Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.
Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.
Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.
Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
by dk on Wed Feb 22, 2006 4:30 pm
Hello from Utah,
I've been out for a while taking care of my dislocated shoulder; dislocated it twice while shooting snowmobiles at Widowmaker and Bear Lake Hillclimbs. Took last week off to heal and may go to the next event 3 and 4 March. While I was out of commission (just a bit slower) I've been practicing my headshots. I have two very patient models in my sons. Here are a couple shots that my wife loves but I think there may be something missing. What do you think?
I don't like sepia but this one isn't too bad; maybe a little hot on his forehead.
Although not a headshot, I'd still like to know how you think I'm progressing.
I am bound and determined to make photography my vocation.
Thanks a million.
David
"Do more than belong, participate. Do more than care, help. Do more than believe, practice. Do more than be fair, be kind. Do more than dream, work." -W. A. Ward
-

dk
- Member
-
- Posts: 91
- Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2005 9:27 am
- Location: Spanish Fork, Utah, USA
-
by wendellt on Wed Feb 22, 2006 4:47 pm
the first one seems a little flat only because of the position and brightness of the light source
your son has great facial features
It's your job to position him or charge the light to exentuate his features
1. try 1 static light source directly in front study what that does to his face
2. move it to the left side of the face study what that does
3. try different lightsource positions
usually a light source at 10 'o' clock just above and to the left of the face will exentuate his eyebrow ridge and nose
You will have to experiment because subtle changes int he position or light power can actually produce hard shadows or a desired effect
if you have flash on a remote cord this will make it easier to position a light source rather than moving a lamp around the place.
also mind the background somethign non distracting like a white wall or a black background
the 2nd one is a lovely shot i would just mention it looks like it needs slightly more contrast but that's it
and the 3rd shot is excellent, pose and lighting
-

wendellt
- Outstanding Member of the year (Don't try this at home.)
-
- Posts: 4078
- Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2005 10:04 am
- Location: Dilettante Outside the City Walls, Sydney
-
by dk on Wed Feb 22, 2006 5:30 pm
Wendell,
Thanks for the tips and comments. On number one, it seems a bit flat to me also. To correct this I essentially need the lighting to reveal the roundness of Tristan's face. I would position additional lights or at least reflectors to gain the more three-demensional look. I hope this is correct.
Number two. When you say I need more contrast, what does that mean? What is contrast?
Number three, thanks for the comments and all your help. BTW, I had a look at your website; wow, I'm impressed.
Thanks again.
David
"Do more than belong, participate. Do more than care, help. Do more than believe, practice. Do more than be fair, be kind. Do more than dream, work." -W. A. Ward
-

dk
- Member
-
- Posts: 91
- Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2005 9:27 am
- Location: Spanish Fork, Utah, USA
-
by wendellt on Wed Feb 22, 2006 5:39 pm
actually on number two looking at it again it's exposed well. Adding more contrast like adjusting the highlights and shadows would exentuate the face
but darken the jumper your son is wearing
perhaps do a selection on his face and then adjust highlight and shadow tones to improve contrast
although it is a difessed light portrait so this difussed soft flat look may be what your after, it does have a nice feel
I guess just play around with the lighting position on the first it is flat and many would say overexposed, it workd best if the room is slightly dark so you can just concentrate on the lighting from the flash rather than complicating the scene with reflectors and additional lights, start simple then move on to more complicated lighting setup. For this type of indoor portrait a reflectors efffects would be minimal, you don't need to use one.
but persoanlly artistically don't find anythign wrong with an overexposed image as it has a certain ambience to it
-

wendellt
- Outstanding Member of the year (Don't try this at home.)
-
- Posts: 4078
- Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2005 10:04 am
- Location: Dilettante Outside the City Walls, Sydney
-
by Matt. K on Wed Feb 22, 2006 7:34 pm
David
These are beautiful portraits. Stop thinking about technique and just keep shooting them under different conditions. Maybe try reducing your exposure by about 0.7 for a more moody, sombre effect.
Regards
Matt. K
-

Matt. K
- Former Outstanding Member Of The Year and KM
-
- Posts: 9981
- Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2004 7:12 pm
- Location: North Nowra
by mudder on Wed Feb 22, 2006 8:17 pm
In the first one, the lack of any detail below the boys head makes him look as though he's sort of floating there, well to me it does...
The second one I like as a nice natural smile, seems nicely exposed, background's busy but nice shot...
Ah, the third one is the pick of the bunch for me... Love the light and the scene near the old paling fence, deep in thought, makes me wonder what he's thinking of???... Really like this...
Aka Andrew
-

mudder
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 3020
- Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2004 5:58 pm
- Location: Melbourne - Burwood East
-
by dk on Thu Feb 23, 2006 1:34 am
I am grateful to you all for your kindness and thoughtful comments. Aside from my dear family, I love photography. I try with all this 52 year old brain and heart can give to produce images that are appealing to the client, and thought-provoking to everyone else.
Again I appreciate you all.
Thanks a million.
David
"Do more than belong, participate. Do more than care, help. Do more than believe, practice. Do more than be fair, be kind. Do more than dream, work." -W. A. Ward
-

dk
- Member
-
- Posts: 91
- Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2005 9:27 am
- Location: Spanish Fork, Utah, USA
-
Return to Image Reviews and Critiques
|