Warning...B&W kids shots!Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
7 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Warning...B&W kids shots!Hi Everyone,
I'm just trying out a few black and white conversions using channel mixer, levels, contrast, and unsharp mask. I believe I still have a long way to go, but I'm just after some opinions/ideas/suggestions! http://members.optushome.com.au/janestu/photos/benb&w1130206.jpg http://members.optushome.com.au/janestu/photos/benjessicab&w1130206.jpg http://members.optushome.com.au/janestu/photos/jessicab&w1130206.jpg ....sorry about the links, for some reason the image tags wouldn't embed my images! I'll try again later....
Never used the channel; mixer to make black and whites
I just simply if you greyscale them and tweak the mid tones and shadows you get the same result the 3rd one has the best tone - well done 2nd excellent picture but there are blown highlights int he girls hair that look too distracting, not sure if the original was overexposed or your channel mixing has caused that it looks like a post processed blowout 1st one is good too but the tone looks a bit flat, it may suit the mood though or the context in which the shot was taken, slight highlight and shadow tone contrast may be an improvement this is very subjective so i woudl say apart form the technical things everything is sweet photographically
Hi Jane
I always use the Channel Mixer to convert to B&W. One thing that I read, which I usually try and adhere to is that you should try to keep the totals of your percentages to 100% (eg. R:10%, G:65%, B:25%). If your totals exceed 100%, you will start to make your photos look more "high-key" or over-exposed (which can sometimes be a great effect, too). Nice photos, by the way. Some parts look a touch overexposed, but I'm not sure if this was because of how you mixed the channels, or how the photos were taken ![]() Dave
Nikon D7000 | 18-105 VR Lens | Nikon 50 1.8G | Sigma 70-300 APO II Super Macro | Tokina 11-16 AT-X | Nikon SB-800 | Lowepro Mini Trekker AWII Photography = Compromise
Hi stormygirl,
I always use the channel mixer for B&W conversions. Here is something I shamelessly stole from another forum, use it for conversion to B&W to get similar effects of different film types. The "I like" at the end is actually from the original poster, not mine ![]() Use them with channel mixer red-green-blue. In monochrome mode._Agfa 200X: 18,41,41 / Agfapan 25: 25,39,36 / Agfapan 100: 21,40,39 / Agfapan 400: 20,41,39 / Ilford Delta 100: 21,42,37 / Ilford Delta 400: 22,42,36 / Ilford Delta 400 Pro & 3200: 31,36,33 / Ilford FP4: 28,41,31 / Ilford HP5: 23,37,40 / Ilford Pan F: 33,36,31 / Ilford SFX: 36,31,33 / Ilford XP2 Super: 21,42,37 / Kodak Tmax 100: 24,37,39 / Kodak Tmax 400: 27,36,37 / Kodak Tri-X: 25,35,40 And these basic ones: Normal Contrast: 43,33,30 /High Contrast: 40,34,60 and at last a generic BW: 24,68,8. I like to 50,50,0 or 25,75,0. Does the name Pavlov ring a bell?
Thanks Wendell and Dave!
I've just tried to embed them again, and the image tags won't let me...oh well! The photo of the both of them was actually taken into the sun...hence the blown highlights on their hair and their faces in the shadow. I couldn't do much about it, and tried to burn it in a little, but really made no difference. It's a sweet photo of the both of them, so I thought I'd play around with it! ![]() Thanks for those tips Dave, very handy to know, as I wasn't sure where the sliders should be. I just played around a little until I thought it looked OK! I'll keep trying! Oooh, just noticed your post myarhidia...thanks for these, I'll give them a go as I love B&W film!
I like the end result of these b&w conversions. Plenty of contrast too.
Myarhidia; great work on providing those b&w film settings for the channel mixer. I use a variety of methods for my conversions depending on the image, but I will give these a try _______________________ Cheers, Paul.
Oh, I also meant to add there is a nice little technique to add contrast to a b&w image. Best to do this on a separate duplicate layer and then adjust opacity to fine tune the result.
After you do your conversion open the Unsharp Mask filter. Adjust settings to: Amount 15%, Radius 65, Threshold 1. Apply this to your image for a noticable increase in contrast. ____________________ Cheers, Paul.
Previous topic • Next topic
7 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|