Raskill wrote:Did you find any issues using the TC with the 70-200? Given it was such a bright day I gather that the loss of light didn't effect anything?
Exactly: f/2.8 + 1.5 stops = f/4.8 plus another stop or so for added sharpness, but on a fine day, pfft, whatever.
In terms of image quality, it's not as good as the 70-200 VR on its own, noticeably softer images. It's actually a bit annoying when you get used to the quality of your shots at 200 mm, your ones at 340 mm (effective) don't seem as good! The bottom 3 shots were with the TC17EII and demanded some reasonably strong USM to look good, whereas the pics without the TC look sharp without any USM. They of course can benefit from judicious use of USM, but the pics with the TC need more.
For panning the 70-200 is fine but for the front on shots, especially for the F3s, I found I really needed more length. Thankfully for my ego my fiancee doesn't agree!

Now I'm tossing up between the Nikkor 80-400 VR/Sigma 80-400 OS/AF-S Nikkor 300/4 and maybe a TC14EII if I go with the prime! Unless kipper wants me to safeguard his 500 f/4 while he's away.
Paul: yep that's the one, and it's still shooting flames.
