I'd like to hear your opinion.
Cheers,
Owen.


Before SunriseModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
21 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Before SunriseHi Guys. Unsure which version I like better, the colour or the black and white.
I'd like to hear your opinion. Cheers, Owen. ![]() ![]()
Hey Owen
![]() I know what you mean, they are both great pics in their own right ![]() I think I'm tending towards the B&W one, which is unusual for me. It just seems to have a bit more depth about it. *** When getting there is half the fun! ***
Hi Sheepie. Thanks for your comment, I am inclining towards the b&w version as well. discovered it purely by accident - I was playing around in lab mode and this was the lightness channel.
I passed this one up when I was processing my shots from a few weeks ago, I guess it doesn't hurt to go back through them once in a while. Cheerio. Owen.
I may be in the minority but I prefer the colour one.
Steve check out my image gallery @
http://photography.avkomp.com/gallery3
colour for me ....... but a bit earlier so there is more colour in the sky.......
Cheers ....bp....
Difference between a good street photographer and a great street photographer.... Removing objects that do not belong... happy for the comments, but .....Please DO NOT edit my image..... http://bigpix.smugmug.com Forever changing
Hi,
I like both photos. I think these two photos each give a different message: No: 1 vibrant, energetic, nice colours, the day is rising, things to happen ... No: 2 suttle, nice tonal shades, softer story, more relaxed. My 20 cents, CD
Colored vers. for sure! The tones of the sky are simply magnificent. What camera was used? Settings?
..:: http://www.flickr.com/photos/nicknav ::..
..:: http://vortsekz.info ::.. ..:: http://vorty.deviantart.com ::.. D70, 50/1.8, 18-70/3.5-4.5, TLZ2, 1GB Ultra II CF
Beautiful shot Owen. IMO the colour suits this image better Owen as those pastel tones really enhance the image. Whereas black and white would be better suited to a more contrasty image.
cheers marco
Thanks guys.
This was taken with the D70 featuring the tokina 12-24 at 12mm. The sky colours were enhanced when I did a levels adjustment, but saturation stayed as is. I appreciate the comments regarding preference to colour or black and white... I still like black and white - I did try increasing the overall contrast but there were too many dark areas in it. Again thanks for the comments.
Tough call Owen. I can't pick between them. The test I use is "Would I want them hanging in my living room and would I enjoy looking at it every day?". Answer is "Yes" on both counts for both these shots. Excellent images, each a winner in its own way.
Simon
D300 l MB-D10 l D70 l SB-800 l 70-200 VR l TC 17-E l 18-70 f3.5-4.5 l 70-300 f4-5.6 l 50 f1.4 l 90 Macro f2.8 l 12-24 f4 http://www.redbubble.com/people/manta
Both are beautiful Owen, and you have been putting out some great work lately but my preference is the colour one
![]() Well done my friend. Keep up the excellent 'work' ![]() Geoff
Special Moments Photography Nikon D700, 50mm 1.4, 85mm 1.4, 70-200 2.8VR, SB800 & some simple studio stuff.
Owen, a beautiful shot. I like the coloured version best. A suggestion, if I could be so bold: have you tried cropping off the bottom third of the (coloured) image. I did so by just scrolling the page down and IMHO it adds even more punch to the shot.
Cheers John D3, D300, 14-24/2.8, 24-70/2.8, 85/1.4, 80-400VR, 18-200VR, 105/2.8 VR macro, Sigma 150/2.8 macro
http://www.johndarguephotography.com/
It's a tough choice, but if you held me at gunpoint, I'd have to choose the colour version. The colours in it are just a bit different and gives it a bit of oomph. The b&w, while it creates a nice atmosphere, the grass to the right get a bit lost.
Hassy, Leica, Nikon, iPhone
Come follow the rabbit hole...
lovce the colours, nice, up early i see !
i would have loved to see a shot also without the foreground reeds ... or even standing other side of bridge with bridge and sunrise colours on right of composition and a wide expanse to the left ... but may not have worked (cant see obviously) http://davidsonimagery.com/
Right place, right time, where the hecks my camera ...
Definately the color one for me out of these, but maybe if the contrast in the B&W one was increased a smidge I might be swayed...
The color one seems to scream nice soft, late light and the color and tone makes the shot for me... I assume it's just me but the color one looks sharper for some reason??? ![]() Aka Andrew
Thanks for all the comments. It appears the black and white is falling out of favour
![]() The black and white was copied after sharpening so I am not sure about the sharpness. darb: This was taken from the other side of the bridge, but at 18mm rather than 12mm. Cheers, Owen.
Previous topic • Next topic
21 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|