The blue in the second shot is not as intense as I remember it.


sydney iconsModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
9 posts
• Page 1 of 1
sydney iconsAs suggested by some forum members, I tried carrying my camera everywhere I went, and these two shots came up. I know the subjects have been seen by many cameras - but the two scenes took my fancy. C&C would be great...
The blue in the second shot is not as intense as I remember it. ![]() ![]()
the 2nd one has great composition like the way you lined up the leadign lines with the other elements very well thought out
the firstshot of pier 2 is where i work, the very top 2 windows on the roof from the left is where i work
G'day,
Don't know the first thing about this sort of style shot but just to offer another viewers thoughts/ramblings ![]() The first one has great color and saturation, seems excellent exposure, foreground just seems really busy to me with all the close lit windows. My eye seems to go to the bridge pylon (which has lovely light) and there seems to be a fair bit of open space in the sky with no texture, great color but no texture, maybe a slight crop off the top? Also find the stairs in the BR corner distracting, maybe either fully in frame or not in it??? Hmmm, wonder about a crop with some off the top and cut-off the stairs in teh BR cnr...? The second is an interesting example of new tech and old craft, like the way you've framed it with the old craft being over-powered by the new tech stuff... Aka Andrew
And if you enlarge the view odf the image, we can actually see you hard at it, Wendell. g.
Gary Stark Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
Nice work, I like the exposure and lighting in the first one, but for me the composition could of been better.
The second I really like the composition, it's been carefully done as wendell pointed out, and works well IMO.
Interesting composition. I prefer the second shot.
Yep, I need to carry my camera around with me more often.
Cheers for the tips - I re-cropped the first one to take out some sky and the stairs on the right. I like it much more.
Maybe I could see Wendell using a 1D, but unfortunately the 350D just doesn't cut it... ![]()
Previous topic • Next topic
9 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|