seem pretty good




takumar fisheyeModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
6 posts
• Page 1 of 1
takumar fisheyeBeen waiting for the sun to come out so i could try out the old screwmount Takumer 17mm fisheye on my DS.
seem pretty good ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Shane
Life's too short to be sad ! http://bigred4x4.blogspot.com/2008/01/welcome.html http://bigred.redbubble.com
shane:
wonder if you have any idea what picture angle you get with that lens on a digital body?? I guess the adaptor you need has a similar effect to an extension tube and will increase focal length? seems to be not that fished to me. Steve check out my image gallery @
http://photography.avkomp.com/gallery3
Being a 17mm, and the Pentax having a 1.5 (?) crop factor, this is giving a FoV similar to a 24mm, I guess, hence the absence of too much distortion, although there is still some present.
I love the 2nd and third of these; the colour in the second is very good, and the contrast in the leaves in the third makes for a very good composition, IMHO. And aren't the old lenses just wonderful? ![]() g.
Gary Stark Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
the fisheye effect can be enhanced by tilting the lens away from the horizon but as the camera only uses the central part of the image you still don't get much of an effect on digital.
still, makes it a pretty good wide angle lens. i have an 8 mm Sigma for real fisheye effect. Shane
Life's too short to be sad ! http://bigred4x4.blogspot.com/2008/01/welcome.html http://bigred.redbubble.com
the adapter i use keeps the lens in the same place as a film body would. the lessened effect is due to the crop factor. still a nice piece of glass though ![]() Shane
Life's too short to be sad ! http://bigred4x4.blogspot.com/2008/01/welcome.html http://bigred.redbubble.com
Previous topic • Next topic
6 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|