I've been experimenting with water once again. Could I have some feedback on these. Please be brutally honest.




Many thanks
Water dropsModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
17 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Water dropsHello,
I've been experimenting with water once again. Could I have some feedback on these. Please be brutally honest. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Many thanks Matt
stunning technically brilliant work
2nd and3rd are a wipeout! are these drops flicked across or are they drops heading downwards and you just tilted them Cream want drops as a themed concept in one of their fashion shoots, i suggest you contact them now
Technically I am very impressed, but as stand alone images they do not do a lot for me.
"The good thing about meditation is that it makes doing nothing respectable"
D3 - http://www.oneputtphotographics.com
Matt I assume this was taken with the D70. Can you expand on the strategies you used to get these shots and whether the 18-70 was used with an SB800 etc. They are great images and might even be cropped more heavily to isolate aspects of them for an abstract presentation.
In the end we know Nothing, but in the meantime Learn like crazy.
Your Camera Does Matter Nikon D70 D200 D300 PPOK
Perhaps I should expand on my earlier comment. They do not grab me because I think that the addition of colour to the images would really make the technical brilliance stand out.
"The good thing about meditation is that it makes doing nothing respectable"
D3 - http://www.oneputtphotographics.com
Matt, well ahh let me say i think these look cool with the lighting and well different, i am not a technical person but these are fine.
D3,D2x,D70,18-70 kit lens,Sigma 70-200mm F2.8EX HSM,Nikon AF-I 300m F2.8, TC20E 2X
80-400VR,SB800,Vosonic X Drive,VP6210 40 http://www.oz-images.com
I think that technically these images are excellent. Good lighting and colour. What they lack is a context. I guess you can hone your technique on the water but need to think about what it is doing , show something of where it is going/coming to/from to have a truely excellent shot. Having seen some of your other work I'm sure this won't be long in coming!!
_________________ Cheers, Paul.
I like them Matt, like them alot. To be really honest the super hot section to the far left is a little irritating and I'd find some a way to reduce it, crop it whatever before I consider submitting them (but hey its on par with your smoke work, so if Cream is interested, go for it).
The first pic is damn sharp and the rest are a bit soft, but I'm not sure if it's due to the jpg conversion.
Can you please give us some details about the setup, etc? ![]() Hassy, Leica, Nikon, iPhone
Come follow the rabbit hole...
It irritates me too Craig, and the more I look the more I don't like which detracts from the whole image. I agree that the image lacks a "reason d'etre" so to speak and will revist this with another eye perhaps. The set up was relatively simple - two flash heads directed at a background from bottom and top right (the image have been rotated) and the water poured/thrown/swirled onto the floor. The D70 triggered the flashes remotely. Matt
Personally I think the 3rd shot works well as a stand alone image. I can imagine it a large poster print by itself on a large wall. The others, although technically great lose a bit as the water loses form.
![]() Love it. Ideas forming. More playtime ahead ![]() ![]() Cheers
Mark ![]() http://www.trekaboutphotography.com He who dies with the most lenses wins...
Matt
You are on to something pretty interesting here. I think you have pinned them down to about 80% of brilliant....but need to keep refining the technique. A tad more DOF....you can get that by moving back just a little, up the ISO just a little, and get another f-stop maybe. Keep pushing this subject and you will end up with fine art. Ansel Adams reputedly shot 1000 pics of a white cup and saucer to see what combination of SP and F-stop, film and lighting gave the best result. And he had to pay for his film! Regards
Matt. K
Great shots!
![]() ![]()
Very cool - looks like I might be involved in re-shooting these in the near future commercially. Not overly sure yet but initial reactions seem positive.
Thanks for the technical tips Matt, I'll definately try them next time . Many thanks for the feedback people. Matt
Previous topic • Next topic
17 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|