Abandoned Bowls Club

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Abandoned Bowls Club

Postby DionM on Fri Mar 10, 2006 8:52 pm

An abandoned Bowls Club in Brisbane.

I decided to play with desaturation (rather than BW conversion). My first attempt. I'm not really that sure, so would appreciate some C+C. Be harsh. I don't mind! This is a style I want to work on. I think my composition could have been better, but I'm not sure how. I want that abandoned look.

Image

Image

Canon 20D and a bunch of lovely L glass and a 580EX. Benro tripod. Manfrotto monopod. Lowepro and Crumpler bags. And a pair of Sigma teleconverters, and some Kenko tubes.
http://www.dionm.net/
DionM
Senior Member
 
Posts: 898
Joined: Mon Aug 22, 2005 10:11 pm
Location: Holland Park, Brisbane

Postby Alex on Fri Mar 10, 2006 8:54 pm

2nd one is really working for me. Did you do any desaturation on this?

Alex
User avatar
Alex
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3465
Joined: Thu Feb 24, 2005 6:14 pm
Location: Melbourne - Nikon

Postby DionM on Fri Mar 10, 2006 8:58 pm

Alex,

Yes both shots were desaturated, + uppped in constrast and brightness, and had some level chopping.

Canon 20D and a bunch of lovely L glass and a 580EX. Benro tripod. Manfrotto monopod. Lowepro and Crumpler bags. And a pair of Sigma teleconverters, and some Kenko tubes.
http://www.dionm.net/
DionM
Senior Member
 
Posts: 898
Joined: Mon Aug 22, 2005 10:11 pm
Location: Holland Park, Brisbane

Postby mudder on Fri Mar 10, 2006 9:14 pm

I'm no good at critique so I'll just ramble instead :lol:

#1, Not much you could do about it or another angle or what-ever but the trees behind the centre/buildings seem to make the old centre buildings less catching to the eye, I go to the run down shade things, they work well, wonder how it'd be though, if you concentrated on just the one shade thingy? The image just seems busy and I think I wander around... Maybe a simpler image with less objects sort of thing...

Be tempted to select the sky and play with levels and curves etc and get more contrast in the sky textures too...

#2, The old sign really grabs my eye and the lines draw me into the picture, I think the trees at the end of the lines my eyes are following though seems to break the atmosphere or change the feel...

Sometimes you can help focus the viewer on what you want them to using a soft vignette, for an old look maybe with some grain?

Just rambling :lol:
Aka Andrew
User avatar
mudder
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3020
Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2004 5:58 pm
Location: Melbourne - Burwood East

Postby leek on Fri Mar 10, 2006 10:41 pm

Nice shots Dion, but the desat doesn't really work for me...
I find #1 to be better from a composition point of view...
Cheers, John
Leek@Flickr | Leek@RedBubble | Leek@DeviantArt

D700; D200; Tokina 12-24; Nikkor 50mm f1.4,18-70mm,85mm f1.8, 105mm,80-400VR, SB-800s; G1227LVL; RRS BH-55; Feisol 1401
User avatar
leek
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3135
Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 4:46 pm
Location: Lane Cove, Sydney

Postby DionM on Fri Mar 10, 2006 10:45 pm

Mudder,

Yes you are right. I was struggling with composition, and I know that suburbia in the distance of #2 spoils it. #1 it was hard to isolate a shade, but that is what I wanted to try and do. I was trying to get a bit of the overgrown turf into the shot too ... too much I think.

Leek,

Do you think B+W might work better for that "abandoned" look?

Canon 20D and a bunch of lovely L glass and a 580EX. Benro tripod. Manfrotto monopod. Lowepro and Crumpler bags. And a pair of Sigma teleconverters, and some Kenko tubes.
http://www.dionm.net/
DionM
Senior Member
 
Posts: 898
Joined: Mon Aug 22, 2005 10:11 pm
Location: Holland Park, Brisbane

Postby leek on Fri Mar 10, 2006 10:50 pm

DionM wrote:Leek, Do you think B+W might work better for that "abandoned" look?


yep... B&W / Sepia might work better, but increased saturation might work as well...
Cheers, John
Leek@Flickr | Leek@RedBubble | Leek@DeviantArt

D700; D200; Tokina 12-24; Nikkor 50mm f1.4,18-70mm,85mm f1.8, 105mm,80-400VR, SB-800s; G1227LVL; RRS BH-55; Feisol 1401
User avatar
leek
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3135
Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 4:46 pm
Location: Lane Cove, Sydney

Postby Greg B on Sat Mar 11, 2006 7:07 am

Dion, I like number 2 more than 1 but both are good, and I don't mind the partially desaturated look at all. I think it adds to the desolate feel very nicely.

Maybe worth a re-shoot when the weather is bleak, dark skies etc.
Greg - - - - D200 etc

Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius hits a target no one else can see.
- Arthur Schopenhauer
User avatar
Greg B
Moderator
 
Posts: 5938
Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2004 7:14 pm
Location: Surrey Hills, Melbourne

Postby Oneputt on Sat Mar 11, 2006 7:11 am

Dion for what it is worth I think that for what you are trying to achieve a simple uncluttered composition would be best. Both of these appear to be too busy to achieve the forlorn look.
"The good thing about meditation is that it makes doing nothing respectable"

D3 - http://www.oneputtphotographics.com
User avatar
Oneputt
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3174
Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2005 3:58 pm
Location: Stuck in traffic Maroochydore.

Postby Frankenstein on Sat Mar 11, 2006 11:58 am

Dion,
I like the desaturation treatment you've given these shots - it somehow adds to the overall feeling of neglect and "oldness" (is that a word :?: )

Frank
My photo gallery: http://www.frankalvaro.net
>>>> Nikon D300...Nikon 18-200 VR...Sigma 10-20...Tamron 90mm macro <<<<
"I've got an idea--an idea so smart that my head would explode if I even began to know what I'm talking about. " Peter Griffin
User avatar
Frankenstein
Senior Member
 
Posts: 504
Joined: Sun Apr 24, 2005 12:23 pm
Location: Ruse (Sydney)

Postby petal666 on Sat Mar 11, 2006 1:11 pm

Pity yuu didn't get picks when they were still looking after one green but had let the other one go, it was such a striking contrast.
Canon 1D III
User avatar
petal666
Senior Member
 
Posts: 737
Joined: Thu Sep 16, 2004 7:17 am
Location: Toowng QLD - 1D III


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques