I love this glass

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

I love this glass

Postby dk on Sat Mar 11, 2006 12:45 am

Here are a couple recent shots with my new toy (80-200 f/2.8). I was shooting with natural light only (I know, against the rules when shooting portraits. One needs fill at least), I was to lazy to get the SB600 out of the truck; besides, I might have missed this little fella. The Victory motorcycle was taken at my favorite spot near home. When the sun is just right the images really stand out. Let me know what you think.

Image

Image

Image

Image

A couple of comments I need to add; my computer crashed the other day and the framed images of the Victory motorcycle are all I have. I know the tele-pole is distracting, but I'm just not proficient enough yet to clone it out. Also, do you like the bike in b&w or color?

Thank a million.

David

It's snowing again, arrrrrg!!! Well maybe I can try my new glass on some snowmobile in Jackson Wyoming.
"Do more than belong, participate. Do more than care, help. Do more than believe, practice. Do more than be fair, be kind. Do more than dream, work." -W. A. Ward
User avatar
dk
Member
 
Posts: 91
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2005 9:27 am
Location: Spanish Fork, Utah, USA

Postby BBJ on Sat Mar 11, 2006 8:45 am

David, nice shots and yes this is nice glass it is on my camera 99% of the time and is my most used lens for my motorsport pics i do. Now these pics are great only thing i could say about the bike pics is that he looks frozen and that maybe to high a shutter speed was used, i would have maybe used 1/320, 1/400 at the most maybe a bit lower but never more than 1/500 so stick to some of the speeds that you have used in the past.
Cheers
John
D3,D2x,D70,18-70 kit lens,Sigma 70-200mm F2.8EX HSM,Nikon AF-I 300m F2.8, TC20E 2X
80-400VR,SB800,Vosonic X Drive,VP6210 40
http://www.oz-images.com
User avatar
BBJ
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3651
Joined: Mon Nov 15, 2004 8:49 pm
Location: Mt Gambier South Australia-D70-D2X

Postby Nikon boy on Sat Mar 11, 2006 10:31 am

David nice pics, i would have cropped the arm and tree from image two and the pole from image three it helps focus on the main subject,
just a suggestion,
I used to own an 80-200 before getting my 70-200 vr and i remember it was a joy to use and gave me sharp images and i don't think you always need flash with high quality glass, it gives a more natural look without it and if you shoot in raw exposure wont be a problem as you can adjust to your hearts content later!!
keep shooting and posting
Nikon boy Norman
User avatar
Nikon boy
Member
 
Posts: 368
Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2005 5:51 pm
Location: California Gully

Postby dooda on Sat Mar 11, 2006 10:39 am

Is it possible that we have another Mormon on our boards? That makes three of us that I can tell (Onyx and myself).

My wife's family is from right down the road from you in Elk Ridge.

I like the BW picture. Nice pics.
love's first sighs are wisdom's last

Dave
http://www.flickr.com/photos/elton/
User avatar
dooda
Party Animal
 
Posts: 1591
Joined: Fri Oct 01, 2004 11:47 am
Location: Vancouver, B.C. Canada

Postby dk on Sat Mar 11, 2006 12:35 pm

Thanks for the great suggestions and comments.

John, I don't have the EXIF on the motorcycle but I think I shot it at 500+ for sure; I know the aperature was at 2.8. Question: if I shoot at 1/400 or less where am I setting the aperature? I shoot in manual mode. BTW, I love your shots; any room in OZ for another sports shooter?

Nikon Boy, in the final images I did crop out mom's arm and tree; looks a lot better. The flippin' telephone poles is something I just deal with 'cause I don't have the skills to clone it out; yet. I'm jealous, I want a 70-200 vr. Before I even think of spending another dollar on a lens, my wife has made it perfectly clear that I need to finish our basement. "Right away hun!" She is so tolerant of my photo-addiction.

dooda, I know Elk Ridge very well. Yep, another Mormon on the board. I knew about Onyx. Glad to meet you mate. So, you married a girl from Utah and moved her to Australia? I'd love to move to Australia but alas my wife is very attached to Utah.

Thanks a million for your comments and suggestions....I truly enjoy this forum.

David
"Do more than belong, participate. Do more than care, help. Do more than believe, practice. Do more than be fair, be kind. Do more than dream, work." -W. A. Ward
User avatar
dk
Member
 
Posts: 91
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2005 9:27 am
Location: Spanish Fork, Utah, USA

Postby gstark on Sat Mar 11, 2006 12:56 pm

dk wrote:T Question: if I shoot at 1/400 or less where am I setting the aperature? I shoot in manual mode.


David,

Is your question "how do I set the aperture?" or "what value should I set the aperture to?"

If it's the former, use the front command dial.

If it's the latter, you need to understand that there's a fixed relationship between aperture and shutter speed settings, so thit if you let more light hit your sensor (or film) by lengthening your shutter speed (1/500 -> 1/250) then, to maintain correct exposure (ensure that only the correct amount of light is used) you need to close your aperture by a similar amount.

So, once you've determined the correct exposure for a given scene, for every stop that you extend your exposure time, you need to close your aperture by a stop, and vice versa.
g.
Gary Stark
Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff
The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
User avatar
gstark
Site Admin
 
Posts: 22924
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
Location: Bondi, NSW

Postby dk on Sat Mar 11, 2006 1:48 pm

Gary,

My question was the latter; and your explanation was tops.


David
"Do more than belong, participate. Do more than care, help. Do more than believe, practice. Do more than be fair, be kind. Do more than dream, work." -W. A. Ward
User avatar
dk
Member
 
Posts: 91
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2005 9:27 am
Location: Spanish Fork, Utah, USA

Postby nito on Sat Mar 11, 2006 2:09 pm

there are rules for portraits? :shock: Only rule I go by is whether it looks good or not. Certainly these shots are worthy. :D
nito
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1109
Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 11:24 am
Location: Gladesville, NSW


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques