Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.
Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.
Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.
Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.
Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
by vort on Sun Mar 12, 2006 1:51 am
Comments?
My mate and I went about setting up a mock-studio in his room.. very basic. White sheet tacked up, 2 art books with foil over the back of it with 2 lamps pointing at each one.
Unfortunately the light still wasn't that strong, so I had to resort to using flash at iso 800.. but either way, they turned out ok. We're going to invest in some slightly better lights soon enough.
and random;
What do you think?
-

vort
- Member
-
- Posts: 124
- Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 4:54 pm
- Location: Balmoral, Brisbane
-
by Michael on Sun Mar 12, 2006 2:08 am
The first two pics look a little green, probly if you pulled the green curve down a little and applied a warming filter might look a bit more natural?
Are we there yet?
-

Michael
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 685
- Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2005 8:48 pm
- Location: Toowoomba QLD
-
by vort on Sun Mar 12, 2006 9:08 am
Michael wrote:The first two pics look a little green, probly if you pulled the green curve down a little and applied a warming filter might look a bit more natural?
The green is on purpose 
-

vort
- Member
-
- Posts: 124
- Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 4:54 pm
- Location: Balmoral, Brisbane
-
by petal666 on Sun Mar 12, 2006 10:10 pm
vort wrote:The green is on purpose 
Looks really bad in the first one.
Canon 1D III
-

petal666
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 737
- Joined: Thu Sep 16, 2004 7:17 am
- Location: Toowng QLD - 1D III
-
by Alpha_7 on Sun Mar 12, 2006 10:16 pm
I really like the random one, different and excellent.
The green tinge doesn't really work for me.
-

Alpha_7
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 7259
- Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 6:19 pm
- Location: Mortdale - Sydney - Nikon D700, x-D200, Leica, G9
-
by vort on Sun Mar 12, 2006 11:35 pm
petal666 wrote:vort wrote:The green is on purpose 
Looks really bad in the first one.
Yeah I gotta get aruond to fixing that one up ;P
-

vort
- Member
-
- Posts: 124
- Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 4:54 pm
- Location: Balmoral, Brisbane
-
by gstark on Mon Mar 13, 2006 8:01 am
In the first two, your subject matter is too close to the background, resulting in the harsh shadows on the background.
You say the colour cast is deliberate: why? What are you trying to achieve with this colouration? It's not simply unnatural, it actually makes the subject look quite sickly.
Also, on these two, consider shooting in porttait mode and/or cropping in much more closely on the face.
The outdoor image, by way of contrast, has good colouration and looks warm and natural; a much better image.
g. Gary Stark Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
-

gstark
- Site Admin
-
- Posts: 22924
- Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
- Location: Bondi, NSW
by vort on Mon Mar 13, 2006 10:02 am
gstark wrote:In the first two, your subject matter is too close to the background, resulting in the harsh shadows on the background. You say the colour cast is deliberate: why? What are you trying to achieve with this colouration? It's not simply unnatural, it actually makes the subject look quite sickly. Also, on these two, consider shooting in porttait mode and/or cropping in much more closely on the face. The outdoor image, by way of contrast, has good colouration and looks warm and natural; a much better image.
I was intentionally trying to achieve a dirty look with the subject in the two. I must admit I think I over-did it a bit in editing after looking at them more, so I will fix that up. The harsh shadows are from the flash and yes, he was close to the background due to us only having a small area to work with.
-

vort
- Member
-
- Posts: 124
- Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 4:54 pm
- Location: Balmoral, Brisbane
-
Return to Image Reviews and Critiques
|