Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.
Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.
Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.
Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.
Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
by DaveB on Sun Mar 12, 2006 4:06 pm
Taken yesterday while at the Western Treatment Plant ("Werribee Sewage Farm") with Kipper...
This was taken with my EOS 30D: yesterday was the first real wildlife exercise it's had. I'm still waiting for Adobe to provide Camera Raw support for the 30D, so the above image was processed with Canon's DPP (grumble, grumble).
The 30D really showed its value with flight shots, tracking the focus a bit more easily than the 20D (which was already pretty good).
Mind you, the lighting was a bit tricky. Here's a Black Kite checking us out...

-

DaveB
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1850
- Joined: Wed Aug 31, 2005 10:57 pm
- Location: Box Hill, Vic
by blinkblink on Sun Mar 12, 2006 4:20 pm
Really like the first one. Push me pull you of the bird world. Just excellent.
-

blinkblink
- Member
-
- Posts: 479
- Joined: Thu Sep 15, 2005 6:55 pm
- Location: Romsey, Victoria
by Killakoala on Sun Mar 12, 2006 4:37 pm
Both are great images and very well taken. The first one is quite unusual and interesting. I like their bent beaks, it really adds to the great posing they have done for you 
Steve. |D700| D2H | F5 | 70-200VR | 85 1.4 | 50 1.4 | 28-70 | 10.5 | 12-24 | SB800 |Website-> http://www.stevekilburn.comLeeds United for promotion in 2014 - Hurrah!!!
-

Killakoala
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 5398
- Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2004 3:31 pm
- Location: Southland NZ
-
by Oneputt on Sun Mar 12, 2006 7:43 pm
Love the first one, two birds on one pair of legs. Great capture  The halo on the second is a little disconcerting, maybe too much sharpening?
-

Oneputt
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 3174
- Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2005 3:58 pm
- Location: Stuck in traffic Maroochydore.
-
by Willy wombat on Mon Mar 13, 2006 3:09 am
Looks good Dave
-

Willy wombat
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 2284
- Joined: Mon Jun 20, 2005 10:47 pm
- Location: Bentleigh, VIC Australia
by kipper on Mon Mar 13, 2006 9:05 am
Oneputt there is no haloing on the second photo. That is purely due to the position of the sun shining through the tips of the feathers from behind - backlighting. It's on all of my shots aswell when shooting the bird at that angle.
Dave, your exposure is a bit too long on the first as the whites are blown - loss of feather/plumage detail. Great shots though 
Darryl (aka Kipper) Nikon D200
-
kipper
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 3738
- Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 9:23 pm
- Location: Hampshire, UK
by DionM on Mon Mar 13, 2006 9:20 am
Dave,
First one is great
What's the grumble with DPP? It's my editor of choice; I only use PS for sharpening and resizing.
Canon 20D and a bunch of lovely L glass and a 580EX. Benro tripod. Manfrotto monopod. Lowepro and Crumpler bags. And a pair of Sigma teleconverters, and some Kenko tubes. http://www.dionm.net/
-
DionM
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 898
- Joined: Mon Aug 22, 2005 10:11 pm
- Location: Holland Park, Brisbane
-
by kipper on Mon Mar 13, 2006 9:36 am
A lot of pros hate it and tend to use Adobe CS/CS2 and CameraRaw from what I've heard on other forums.
Darryl (aka Kipper) Nikon D200
-
kipper
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 3738
- Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 9:23 pm
- Location: Hampshire, UK
by Glen on Mon Mar 13, 2006 10:16 am
Dave, the first is a tremendous shot, it must have taken some time to get that pose.
When I saw the title red necked, I thought they might be driving a pick up truck with shotguns on the rear window 
-

Glen
- Moderator
-
- Posts: 11819
- Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 3:14 pm
- Location: Sydney - Neutral Bay - Nikon
-
by kipper on Mon Mar 13, 2006 10:20 am
We were at Borrow Pits for 2.5hours so we were there a while 
Darryl (aka Kipper) Nikon D200
-
kipper
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 3738
- Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 9:23 pm
- Location: Hampshire, UK
by DaveB on Mon Mar 13, 2006 10:21 am
kipper wrote:Dave, your exposure is a bit too long on the first as the whites are blown - loss of feather/plumage detail.
On closer examination, you're right: the red channel is clipped in a couple of places in that white. But only just - I could have shot 1/3-stop lower and caught it, but it's just on the border line. In fact this is somewhere I would blame DPP: it's not quite that "hot" in the DPP preview!
I'm sure part of my issue with DPP is lack of familiarity: it works in a quite different manner to my normal workflow. But I'm sure that's not the only explanation.
For example it doesn't have the Exposure/Shadow/Brightness controls of ACR, instead having a Brightness control (you can play with the curve, but it won't for example give control over the highlight areas.
I can't select a group of images and use click-WB to set the WB for all of them: I have to work on one, save the WB as a preset, then apply that to each of the others.
I can't call out to DPP from my cataloging software on an individual image or a group: it wants to browse a whole folder.
When I convert an image into Photoshop it is assigned a random name, losing the original name (which is a pain when I save the PSD).
There's more, but I won't bore you with the details....
I'll be happy when ACR 3.4 comes out and I can calibrate it for my 30D's colours. In the meantime I can take lots of great photos with the camera, but not necessarily get the best out of the RAW files. 
-

DaveB
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1850
- Joined: Wed Aug 31, 2005 10:57 pm
- Location: Box Hill, Vic
by Glen on Mon Mar 13, 2006 10:24 am
Worth the time Kipper for your results, and thats without including your shots
-

Glen
- Moderator
-
- Posts: 11819
- Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 3:14 pm
- Location: Sydney - Neutral Bay - Nikon
-
by kipper on Mon Mar 13, 2006 10:28 am
Dave's are as good as mine. I didn't have the best day out photography wise, but had a great day out spotting wise. Saw a few birds that I've never seen before so I was happy. The thing that was annoying me the most about the avocets was everytime I tried to photograph them they'd have grass/reeds in the background and given the color of the foliage it sort of didn't give a clear seperation of the head. I was trying to get a nice shot of them with a relection in the water. Didn't work though. They're also very wary of people and tended not to come even close to me 
Darryl (aka Kipper) Nikon D200
-
kipper
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 3738
- Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 9:23 pm
- Location: Hampshire, UK
by wmaburnett on Mon Mar 13, 2006 10:45 am
Thats an awesome shot of the birds!almost looks like one with two heads
Nikon D70s, Nikkor 18-70 3.5-5-6 DX AF-S, Nikkor 80-200 2.8D ED, Nikkor 60 2.8D Micro, SB-600 Flash, Kingston 1GB CF card.
Http://www.WBurnett.com
-
wmaburnett
- Member
-
- Posts: 249
- Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2005 7:00 am
- Location: Minnesota, United States
-
by DaveB on Tue Mar 14, 2006 12:51 pm
kipper wrote:The thing that was annoying me the most about the avocets was everytime I tried to photograph them they'd have grass/reeds in the background and given the color of the foliage it sort of didn't give a clear seperation of the head. I was trying to get a nice shot of them with a relection in the water. Didn't work though.
That's what you get for crawling off along the shoreline.
While shooting across the water can provide good perspectives, this is one example of a time when staying a bit higher to get a clean background works too...
And sitting in one spot for a long time did let the birds come in relatively close.
-

DaveB
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1850
- Joined: Wed Aug 31, 2005 10:57 pm
- Location: Box Hill, Vic
by birddog114 on Tue Mar 14, 2006 12:56 pm
DaveB wrote: And sitting in one spot for a long time did let the birds come in relatively close.
Same as hunting and preying chic
Dave,
Great works btw, thanks for sharing.
Birddog114
VNAF, My Beloved Country and Airspace
-

birddog114
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 15881
- Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 8:18 pm
- Location: Belmore,Sydney
Return to Image Reviews and Critiques
|