Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.
Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.
Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.
Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.
Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
by wendellt on Sun Mar 12, 2006 8:51 pm
This is part 6 from Loreal Fashion Week
The roof and lighting setup, the big black chandelier was a feature piece
2nd pic 3 levels of media top level all the camera crews, photographers took level 1 and 2, that night the pressbox was choc o' block of media
Sandwiched between two female photographers I took these. 85mm f1.4, f2.8 ISO800 constant, 1/250 variable, white balance range 4800 - 5400kelvin
always good to get models in the background
most models only have 1 pose in their bag of tricks but it's great when one does more than pose - pix 1 & 2
1st pic shows why most of my images are cropped, since i was on level 1 i got heaps of shots with heads, on other shows i decided to get higher but that presented other problems like foreshortening the model.
one of my ambience shots, sometimes after the show the models walk out again for another round, this is the best time to take creative pics.
the standard runway shot magazines want.
not complete yet but some more here: the Morissey and White Suede shows
http://www.zeduce.org/loreal06.htm
Last edited by wendellt on Sun Mar 12, 2006 10:45 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-

wendellt
- Outstanding Member of the year (Don't try this at home.)
-
- Posts: 4078
- Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2005 10:04 am
- Location: Dilettante Outside the City Walls, Sydney
-
by phillipb on Sun Mar 12, 2006 9:02 pm
Hey Wendell, with so many flashes in close proximity going off at the same time, have you ever tried setting your aperture at f32 and see what results you'd get from the time exposure?
__________ Phillip
**Nikon D7000**
-

phillipb
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 2599
- Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 10:56 am
- Location: Milperra (Sydney) **Nikon D7000**
by wendellt on Sun Mar 12, 2006 9:09 pm
phillipb wrote:Hey Wendell, with so many flashes in close proximity going off at the same time, have you ever tried setting your aperture at f32 and see what results you'd get from the time exposure?
Hi Phillip
if your joking ha ha
flashes does trick your metering
so most runway photographers use manual exposure settings
also poves useful if you need to batch process 100's of shots in a short time as most of the exposures are the same
-

wendellt
- Outstanding Member of the year (Don't try this at home.)
-
- Posts: 4078
- Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2005 10:04 am
- Location: Dilettante Outside the City Walls, Sydney
-
by phillipb on Sun Mar 12, 2006 9:15 pm
Like you said, Quote "sometimes after the show the models walk out again for another round, this is the best time to take creative pics. "
Using f32 and 4 or 5 sec. you'd probably end up with a strobe effect from other people's flashes. Then again it would probably be complete crap.
__________ Phillip
**Nikon D7000**
-

phillipb
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 2599
- Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 10:56 am
- Location: Milperra (Sydney) **Nikon D7000**
by Alpha_7 on Sun Mar 12, 2006 9:16 pm
Nice work Wendell, some gorgeous shots and lovely girls featured here, i love the shot of the lighting setup too, it brings back fond memories.
-

Alpha_7
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 7259
- Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 6:19 pm
- Location: Mortdale - Sydney - Nikon D700, x-D200, Leica, G9
-
by antman on Sun Mar 12, 2006 10:03 pm
Nice pics as usual Wendell.
Just a quick question - How much post processing do you need to do with your images ? To the point where you'll show them in public (at least with these runway shots).
-

antman
- Member
-
- Posts: 323
- Joined: Thu Mar 31, 2005 5:41 pm
- Location: Frenchs Forest, Sydney
-
by wendellt on Sun Mar 12, 2006 10:16 pm
antman wrote:Nice pics as usual Wendell.
Just a quick question - How much post processing do you need to do with your images ? To the point where you'll show them in public (at least with these runway shots).
hi antman
i just select maybe 10 images from each show, i shoot maybe more than 100
just to get everything, closups of the feet(shooes) model walkign back(back shots) etc
out of those 10 they have to be the best because i shoot for cream magazine and they have a specific brief on runway/fashion shots,
After lots of experimentation i figured with good lighting my settigns of f2.8 1/250 ISO 800 produces a picture which needs little exposure comp in post processing, but alot of times in these shows the lighting changes and sometimes i can't compensate for it in the camera so i process those images
for images i post here i always post proces them so the tone is right throughout the set, that includes exposure compensation, shadow contrast and colour balance, and re-crops if there are heads or other elements in the way.
-

wendellt
- Outstanding Member of the year (Don't try this at home.)
-
- Posts: 4078
- Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2005 10:04 am
- Location: Dilettante Outside the City Walls, Sydney
-
by antman on Sun Mar 12, 2006 10:27 pm
Cheers Wendell. Thanks for that. Interesting info.
-

antman
- Member
-
- Posts: 323
- Joined: Thu Mar 31, 2005 5:41 pm
- Location: Frenchs Forest, Sydney
-
by birddog114 on Mon Mar 13, 2006 6:28 am
Wendell,
For all the shots you got in the last weeks with few fashion shows, you picked 10 best shot out of how many shot? 500? 1000? what's the ratio?
And once you submitted to Cream mags, how often and how many photos did they publish each issue?
Have all your photos been published?
Birddog114
VNAF, My Beloved Country and Airspace
-

birddog114
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 15881
- Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 8:18 pm
- Location: Belmore,Sydney
by wendellt on Mon Mar 13, 2006 7:32 am
Birdy got no idea how many i shot over the week, i know i brought back 30gig
i just limit myself to choosen about 10 good shots per show to minimise my work, Cream will only publish very few of them. One reason why it's good to take lots is that you can't sell the same image to several magazines so if you take lots of different ones you can sell or submit more image sto different magazines get more exposure
-

wendellt
- Outstanding Member of the year (Don't try this at home.)
-
- Posts: 4078
- Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2005 10:04 am
- Location: Dilettante Outside the City Walls, Sydney
-
by birddog114 on Mon Mar 13, 2006 7:56 am
Wendellt,
Don't you know the rules?
Whatever you shoot or submit and it's up to te editor(s), perhaps you have done the hard works but they trashed all your labour into the bin. Unless you're in bed with them then it's a difference story.
Pls. remember, in some shooting with few PPs, I learned: they shot thousand photos in an event but none was selected to publish, it's PITA but PPs, they live up with that.
Birddog114
VNAF, My Beloved Country and Airspace
-

birddog114
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 15881
- Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 8:18 pm
- Location: Belmore,Sydney
by Oneputt on Mon Mar 13, 2006 8:07 am
30GB of images, WOW. That is a lot of shooting. You would have to say though that the results were well worth the effort 
-

Oneputt
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 3174
- Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2005 3:58 pm
- Location: Stuck in traffic Maroochydore.
-
by wendellt on Mon Mar 13, 2006 10:18 am
Birddog114 wrote:Wendellt, Don't you know the rules? Whatever you shoot or submit and it's up to te editor(s), perhaps you have done the hard works but they trashed all your labour into the bin. Unless you're in bed with them then it's a difference story.
Pls. remember, in some shooting with few PPs, I learned: they shot thousand photos in an event but none was selected to publish, it's PITA but PPs, they live up with that.
Birdy don't care too much if they trash my efforts, i shoot for them but whatever they don't use I can distribute images to the modelling agency, the models, designers parents of the designers etc use for your own self promotion.
it was a pleasure being down in Melbourne what else was i going to do there? it wasn't a wasted effort.
-

wendellt
- Outstanding Member of the year (Don't try this at home.)
-
- Posts: 4078
- Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2005 10:04 am
- Location: Dilettante Outside the City Walls, Sydney
-
by Alex on Mon Mar 13, 2006 12:02 pm
Thanks for these, Wendell. Thank you for detailing your process - very useful.
Alex
-

Alex
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 3465
- Joined: Thu Feb 24, 2005 6:14 pm
- Location: Melbourne - Nikon
-
by birddog114 on Mon Mar 13, 2006 12:17 pm
wendellt wrote:Birddog114 wrote:Wendellt, Don't you know the rules? Whatever you shoot or submit and it's up to te editor(s), perhaps you have done the hard works but they trashed all your labour into the bin. Unless you're in bed with them then it's a difference story.
Pls. remember, in some shooting with few PPs, I learned: they shot thousand photos in an event but none was selected to publish, it's PITA but PPs, they live up with that.
Birdy don't care too much if they trash my efforts, i shoot for them but whatever they don't use I can distribute images to the modelling agency, the models, designers parents of the designers etc use for your own self promotion. it was a pleasure being down in Melbourne what else was i going to do there? it wasn't a wasted effort.
Wendellt,
I'm not going to say, they were wasted coz the editor(s) didn't publish them, but that how that works for shooting events and Event photogs live with those.
I would like to speak in generally about the works of PJ or Event photographers, of course they don't care and they know what they are doing, but the for people who are at the outer ring, thought all photos were taken by PP will be published or selected to do something else.
Sometimes he or she only needs one of his/ her photos to be published and they become famous.
Birddog114
VNAF, My Beloved Country and Airspace
-

birddog114
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 15881
- Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 8:18 pm
- Location: Belmore,Sydney
by wendellt on Mon Mar 13, 2006 12:30 pm
that's right birddog sorry for missunderstanding you
there wer emany photographers there who shot the whole week
but only 1 or 2 images will be published
i.e photojournalist from the sun herald only got 3 shots published in the paper the next day after the show
but there was a person fromt he sun herald there everyday
some other photographers work for photo agencies they just shoot and store images on their online resource, some get bought but many don't
-

wendellt
- Outstanding Member of the year (Don't try this at home.)
-
- Posts: 4078
- Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2005 10:04 am
- Location: Dilettante Outside the City Walls, Sydney
-
by stubbsy on Mon Mar 13, 2006 12:40 pm
Wendell
I've been looking at all your fashion posts, but generally refrained from commenting, but have decided now is the time. Please don't take offence at what I'm about to say since I am obviously in the minority.
I look at all these shots and all I see are the same boring old model shots you see everywhere. I feel saddened because I believe you have a real talent which is being smothered by the constraints of taking forumulaic pics like these to meet the needs of your potential clients.
Please don't let your artitistic and creative sensibilities wither on the vine in order to produce commercial cookie cutter pics. Make sure you ALSO take the time to show your creative side. That said, commercial and creative CAN coexist and I think the Fred Bare series is a great example of this.
-

stubbsy
- Moderator
-
- Posts: 10748
- Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
- Location: Newcastle NSW - D700
-
by Alpha_7 on Mon Mar 13, 2006 12:47 pm
stubbsy wrote:Wendell I've been looking at all your fashion posts, but generally refrained from commenting, but have decided now is the time. Please don't take offence at what I'm about to say since I am obviously in the minority. I look at all these shots and all I see are the same boring old model shots you see everywhere. I feel saddened because I believe you have a real talent which is being smothered by the constraints of taking forumulaic pics like these to meet the needs of your potential clients. Please don't let your artitistic and creative sensibilities wither on the vine in order to produce commercial cookie cutter pics. Make sure you ALSO take the time to show your creative side. That said, commercial and creative CAN coexist and I think the Fred Bare series is a great example of this.
Well thought out and explained Peter, I don't see why you avoided stating you mind previously, even if you felt it "went against the majority". You do raise some valid points, there is a fine balancing act between keeping your creativity alive and fitting to the expectations of your clients.
While I've been caught up by the fashion, pretty models and solid photography work, you do raise a valid point that on the most part, they fit the same expectations as the rest of the fashion photography we see in the media.
-

Alpha_7
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 7259
- Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 6:19 pm
- Location: Mortdale - Sydney - Nikon D700, x-D200, Leica, G9
-
by wendellt on Mon Mar 13, 2006 12:55 pm
that's right Peter and Craig
thankyou for that valuable insight
I tried to be a little more creative but it was hard since my commercial constraints
I must say there is room for creativity in runway shots if you work for the right aagency like there was a guy called Christian Dowling from Getty Imgas he was comissioned to take different ambience shots and he did exceptional work using slower shutterspeeds to capture movement, zoom flash effects and his backstage work which was trully on the fly creative, i learned a lot from him that you can certainly raise the bar in runway photography if you were free to do so.
Anyway this kind of stuff only happens 4 times a year, so I treat it as seasonal bread and butter work for me. My next project is Fred Bare which will be much more fitting to my creative abilities
-

wendellt
- Outstanding Member of the year (Don't try this at home.)
-
- Posts: 4078
- Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2005 10:04 am
- Location: Dilettante Outside the City Walls, Sydney
-
by Alpha_7 on Mon Mar 13, 2006 12:59 pm
wendellt wrote:Anyway this kind of stuff only happens 4 times a year, so I treat it as seasonal bread and butter work for me. My next project is Fred Bare which will be much more fitting to my creative abilities
Looking forward to the results of your next project already, can't wait!
-

Alpha_7
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 7259
- Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 6:19 pm
- Location: Mortdale - Sydney - Nikon D700, x-D200, Leica, G9
-
by stubbsy on Mon Mar 13, 2006 2:10 pm
Wendell
That's good. It would be terrible to see you squander your talent.
-

stubbsy
- Moderator
-
- Posts: 10748
- Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
- Location: Newcastle NSW - D700
-
Return to Image Reviews and Critiques
|