#1

#2

#3

#4

#5

Sea gull (5pics)Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
11 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Sea gull (5pics)Please comment.
#1 ![]() #2 ![]() #3 ![]() #4 ![]() #5 ![]() Nikon D70s + Nikkor AF 28-105D+ AFS 70-300 VR + AF 50 f/1.8 D + Tokina 12-24 f/4 + DX 10.5 Fisheye+SB800
Re: Sea gull (5pics)Hi Tyrone
#1 Oversaturated blues. Nice but a bit dull. #2 Dont like the background and there is dark lighting ont he bird (shadows)#3 Its interesting - the background adds to the image. Have you considered a panoramic crop. It might work? #4 Similar to #2. Looks nice and sharp though so well done there! #5 Good pose by the subject and well positioned int he frame, but again it looks oversaturated (cyans) to me. Cheers Hope that helps! ![]() Steve (Nikon D200/D700)
My photography website http://wwphoto.redbubble.com/ My photo blog http://www.redbubble.com/people/wwphoto Please feel free to offer any constructive criticism on my works
G'day,
I assume these are all with the 70-300 judging by EXIF? I think that's not an AF-S lens so it makes the focus slower to react and makes it harder for you, I know I'd struggle with birds in flight... Althoung I hear you can "setup" some shots with chips I believe ![]() The metering was matrix I think which may have helped the overall exposure, Aperture pri is a good way to go, I use that for any animal stuff I do as the light changes too much and find it's better to keep the aperture known and constant. They all seem to have really nicely balanced exposure too... Worth playing with some PP maybe to help with shadows if you want to... All nicely framed, auto BW might be making the color adjustments between the shots too, if you shoot raw format and post process you can adjust later on a PC or something, dunno if you're into that or not... Cheers. Aka Andrew
Yep, same here... Guilty, yer honor... ![]() Aka Andrew
The first one is by DX18-70 with CPL.
The others are by sigma 70-200 F2.8 HSM (much faster than 70-300G) ![]() These photos were taken in Glenelg (Adelaide) Thank you for all your comment. Nikon D70s + Nikkor AF 28-105D+ AFS 70-300 VR + AF 50 f/1.8 D + Tokina 12-24 f/4 + DX 10.5 Fisheye+SB800
Yes, I used continuous focus and set the AF mode to AF -C ![]() Nikon D70s + Nikkor AF 28-105D+ AFS 70-300 VR + AF 50 f/1.8 D + Tokina 12-24 f/4 + DX 10.5 Fisheye+SB800
Re: Sea gull (5pics)
Thanks. Is #3 now is better? or.... I have no idea on how to crop it.. ![]() Nikon D70s + Nikkor AF 28-105D+ AFS 70-300 VR + AF 50 f/1.8 D + Tokina 12-24 f/4 + DX 10.5 Fisheye+SB800
Previous topic • Next topic
11 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|