Trip to Canada

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Trip to Canada

Postby suzanneg on Mon Mar 27, 2006 8:49 pm

Thought I would share a few pics from a treck through Johnson's Canyon in Banff from last December.

This is the frozen waterfall
Image
This is not a great photo, but I've included it for interest. At the end of the canyon these guys were climbing the walls of ice
Image
This is a go at a vertical pano to get the whole waterfall in
Image
The next one is a picture of me taken by my husband. It was -30 degrees C on the day so your breath froze on the first thing it hit, which was my hair!
Image

All taken with the Canon 350D with a Tamron 18-200 lense. Happy to get feedback - especially on the pano.
Canon EOS 350D Tamron 18-200mm
Just what do you think you're doing Dave?
User avatar
suzanneg
Member
 
Posts: 315
Joined: Sun Mar 19, 2006 8:26 pm
Location: Epping, Sydney

Postby Alex on Mon Mar 27, 2006 8:59 pm

Great photos there! No. 1 is my favourite. I prefer No.1 to the pano actually. The only negative comment I can make is white balance is a bit cool, but may be it is better that way.

Well done

Alex
User avatar
Alex
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3465
Joined: Thu Feb 24, 2005 6:14 pm
Location: Melbourne - Nikon

Postby Alpha_7 on Mon Mar 27, 2006 9:13 pm

Wow, great views. I really like the terrain it's amazing. I've never been somewhere that cold, I got a laugh at your frozen hair, that must be really COLD!

Out of the first three shots, I think I like #2 the most, with the little dude climing up the ice.
User avatar
Alpha_7
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7259
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 6:19 pm
Location: Mortdale - Sydney - Nikon D700, x-D200, Leica, G9

Postby suzanneg on Mon Mar 27, 2006 9:21 pm

It is really cold - lot's of layers required! The terrain was just stunning. It was hard to decide what not to photograph.

Alex - agree with the white balance, gives everything a blue tinge, but I kind of like it.
Canon EOS 350D Tamron 18-200mm
Just what do you think you're doing Dave?
User avatar
suzanneg
Member
 
Posts: 315
Joined: Sun Mar 19, 2006 8:26 pm
Location: Epping, Sydney

Postby ozczecho on Mon Mar 27, 2006 11:01 pm

Amazing scenery you have captured suzanneg, but the blue tinge IMHO kills the shot and makes it dull. Eventhough I am no expert in PP I wanted to have a look what #1 would look like with some slight colour adjustments.

If you want me to remove this let me know.

Cheers

Mike

Image
User avatar
ozczecho
Senior Member
 
Posts: 785
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 9:41 pm
Location: Beecroft, Sydney

Postby Willy wombat on Mon Mar 27, 2006 11:09 pm

Brrr - it looks freezing!
Steve (Nikon D200/D700)
My photography website http://wwphoto.redbubble.com/
My photo blog http://www.redbubble.com/people/wwphoto
Please feel free to offer any constructive criticism on my works
User avatar
Willy wombat
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2284
Joined: Mon Jun 20, 2005 10:47 pm
Location: Bentleigh, VIC Australia

Postby Mitchell on Mon Mar 27, 2006 11:10 pm

Great series of photos! :)

I agree making the white balance a bit cool adds to the atmosphere - although my personal feeling is that it may be a bit too cool...
I like what Mike has done - although some of the ice seems to have lost detail with overexposure.
User avatar
Mitchell
Member
 
Posts: 238
Joined: Tue Feb 07, 2006 3:16 am
Location: Île Saint Louis, Paris

Postby Michael on Tue Mar 28, 2006 12:11 am

WOW

Thats certainly something we don't see in australia unfortunatly, I'd love to live somewhere like that preferably in EU though.

Very nice photo's too truly envious.
Are we there yet?
User avatar
Michael
Senior Member
 
Posts: 685
Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2005 8:48 pm
Location: Toowoomba QLD

Postby DaveB on Tue Mar 28, 2006 8:33 am

I concur with Mike: the WB in the original is too blue.

Given the conditions I'm sure it WAS that blue, but when there in person your eyes adjust to the scene and this is not the impression you would typically come away with. To match what we experience you typically have to choose a "warmer" balance (if you were to take a print of this as-is and took it back to the scene it might look OK as your eyes would adjust, but where we're in daylight [or our otherwise "normal" environment] it doesn't work very well). If you were shooting with film you would be putting a warming filter on the lens instead.

You should be able to reprocess the RAW file(s) choosing a warmer balance yet keeping the highlights (i.e. not "blowing out" the brighter snow/ice areas) and keeping the blue sky you've managed to include. You DID shoot this in RAW didn't you? :wink:

Very nice images! I'm jealous!
User avatar
DaveB
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1850
Joined: Wed Aug 31, 2005 10:57 pm
Location: Box Hill, Vic

Postby suzanneg on Tue Mar 28, 2006 8:12 pm

Mike,
I like what you have done to the photo, although I agree it has lost some detail in the ice.

DaveB, I am a complete novice and have only just started shooting in RAW, (not when I was in Canada unfortunately). I have only had photoshop on the computer for the last 2 weeks, but have a book and am about to start learning! Looking forward to lots more advice and tips.

Cheers,
Suzanne
Canon EOS 350D Tamron 18-200mm
Just what do you think you're doing Dave?
User avatar
suzanneg
Member
 
Posts: 315
Joined: Sun Mar 19, 2006 8:26 pm
Location: Epping, Sydney


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques