Pittwater and Palm Beach

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Pittwater and Palm Beach

Postby ozczecho on Thu Apr 06, 2006 12:37 am

A few weeks back I experiencing a photographic drought so I decided to break it by (ofcourse) going out and taking photos.

Took my son for a drive to Palm Beach/Pittwater to take some late afternoon/sunset shots....

Naturally, brutal honesty and CC is welcome and appreciated...

Cheers

Mike

#1.
Image

#2.
Image

#3.
Image

#4
Image
User avatar
ozczecho
Senior Member
 
Posts: 785
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 9:41 pm
Location: Beecroft, Sydney

Postby Alpha_7 on Thu Apr 06, 2006 12:45 am

I really like #1 and #4 in this series.

#1 I like the angles and lighting

#4 I like for the simplicy, the colour and the lines.


#2 Doesn't work so good for me

#3 I like, but perhaps a pano cropping a little off the top and bottom ?
User avatar
Alpha_7
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7259
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 6:19 pm
Location: Mortdale - Sydney - Nikon D700, x-D200, Leica, G9

Postby Jonas on Thu Apr 06, 2006 9:27 am

Looks like you've got a great eye for picking out scenes, ozczecho.

#1 is the money shot and the simplicity of #4 is great. I thought the middle two may have benefited from taking them later in the evening as the diffused sunset hasn't really given the pics that golden glow you might have been chasing. Some of the shadows are still a little harsh.

Jonas
Nikon D70s, Nikkor 18-70, Sigma 70-300DG APO
http://www.flickr.com/photos/jonasphoto/
Jonas
Member
 
Posts: 164
Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2005 3:28 pm
Location: Miami, Gold Coast, QLD

Postby ozczecho on Thu Apr 06, 2006 8:27 pm

Hey thanks Craig and Jonas...#1 was my fave as well. #3 tried to catch the "magical hour" light but judging by your responses, I missed it. Interesting suggestion on the pano Craig, somthing to try next time.

Cheers

Mike B
User avatar
ozczecho
Senior Member
 
Posts: 785
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 9:41 pm
Location: Beecroft, Sydney

Postby stubbsy on Thu Apr 06, 2006 9:13 pm

Mike.

Contrary Pierre here. #2 by a mile, and #3 are the standouts for me. I just love the light you've captured in these shots. #4 - too unbalanced. The seat is so heavy it will make the image tilt down to the right after a while. :wink:
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything.
*** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
User avatar
stubbsy
Moderator
 
Posts: 10748
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
Location: Newcastle NSW - D700

Postby Alpha_7 on Thu Apr 06, 2006 11:04 pm

ozczecho wrote:Hey thanks Craig and Jonas...#1 was my fave as well. #3 tried to catch the "magical hour" light but judging by your responses, I missed it. Interesting suggestion on the pano Craig, somthing to try next time.


Mike I actually meant I liked #3, but I just thought it might be stronger like this (please let me know and I'll take the image down).

Image
User avatar
Alpha_7
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7259
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 6:19 pm
Location: Mortdale - Sydney - Nikon D700, x-D200, Leica, G9

Postby suzanneg on Fri Apr 07, 2006 11:30 pm

Number one was my favourite, until I saw the pano crop of number 3 - this makes it into a great shot.
Last edited by suzanneg on Sun Apr 09, 2006 4:22 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Canon EOS 350D Tamron 18-200mm
Just what do you think you're doing Dave?
User avatar
suzanneg
Member
 
Posts: 315
Joined: Sun Mar 19, 2006 8:26 pm
Location: Epping, Sydney

Postby ozczecho on Sat Apr 08, 2006 1:15 am

Alpha_7 wrote:
ozczecho wrote:Hey thanks Craig and Jonas...#1 was my fave as well. #3 tried to catch the "magical hour" light but judging by your responses, I missed it. Interesting suggestion on the pano Craig, somthing to try next time.


Mike I actually meant I liked #3, but I just thought it might be stronger like this (please let me know and I'll take the image down).

Image


Great crop Craig...I like it thanks.

Hey stubbsy, thanks for that. :D

Thanks all for the comments/critique..
User avatar
ozczecho
Senior Member
 
Posts: 785
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 9:41 pm
Location: Beecroft, Sydney

Postby Alpha_7 on Sat Apr 08, 2006 1:23 am

No worries Mike. :)

When cropping this one I paid close attention to the bottom LH and top RH corners, I tried to line it up so the shoreline lead into the shot and tried the same thing with the tree line.

You did all the hard work with taking the shot and capturing the beautiful light, so congrats be I definitely think the pano crop is a winner, if it was my shot I'd be going on the wall for sure :)
User avatar
Alpha_7
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7259
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 6:19 pm
Location: Mortdale - Sydney - Nikon D700, x-D200, Leica, G9

Well done

Postby bindiblue on Sat Apr 08, 2006 7:30 am

Great shots Ozczecho,, and great cropping craig,, very nice,


Suzanne
Nikon D200, 24-120mm VR, 70-300 ED, SB800 flash, Manfrotto tripod,
bindiblue
Member
 
Posts: 277
Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2006 12:23 pm
Location: Caboolture Queensland

Postby mudder on Sun Apr 09, 2006 12:41 am

G'day,

#1 The bright highlight in the sky takes me away from your subject. If you want to keep your subject that bright, I'd try exposing another version of the same RAW image (assuming you shot raw?) with a lower EV and pasting that over the top of this one, then erase all but the highlights of the lower exposure one, that might help to tone down the bright parts of the sky and get some detail back in that area...

#2 I reckon that night work well as a bit of a pano by cropping some off the top and bottom. Same again for the bright spot in the sky...

#3 The foregound seems a bit sparse, maybe crop this one into a bit of a pano? Again crop a smidge off the top and bottom maybe? Also, seems quite bright...? Oh, just noticed Craig's pano, the crop works well...

#4 I really like the simplicity of this, maybe a bot of contrast with levels and curves?
Aka Andrew
User avatar
mudder
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3020
Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2004 5:58 pm
Location: Melbourne - Burwood East

Postby Phenn on Sun Apr 09, 2006 1:05 pm

I personally really like #3 The cropped version of it works quite well.
Phenn
Newbie
 
Posts: 10
Joined: Sun Oct 23, 2005 4:58 pm
Location: Melbourne


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques