Big Waves at Voodoo Point

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Big Waves at Voodoo Point

Postby ABG on Mon Apr 10, 2006 6:25 pm

It's been a while since I posted any images, so I went out to Voodoo this morning after dropping my eldest son at school. There were half a dozen or so surfers enjoying the big waves. Unfortunately they were too far away for me to capture with my kit lens. I would have loved getting my hands on a 300 lens, but alas my piggy bank hasn't built up sufficiently just yet...

Anyway, I took a few photos of waves crashing against the rocks. If I can get myself sufficiently motivated, I might head back out for some dawn shots tomorrow.

C & C welcome.

Image

Image

Image

Image
Andrew
User avatar
ABG
Senior Member
 
Posts: 689
Joined: Mon Nov 14, 2005 1:53 pm
Location: Oatley, Sydney

Postby shakey on Mon Apr 10, 2006 8:57 pm

I like the composition of the first shot. However there is very visible sharpening artifact on the jutting out rocks on the right.
User avatar
shakey
Senior Member
 
Posts: 696
Joined: Sat Apr 09, 2005 9:24 pm
Location: Far South Coast NSW

Postby stubbsy on Mon Apr 10, 2006 9:16 pm

ANdrew

You said it all in your precis. You needed more reach. There is way too much rock and not enough water in these which kills the scale of the scene. YOU know they were big waves, but in isolation the waves in the shots look small. The best thing I'd do with these is to crop out a LOT of the foreground rock. The last image in particular should benefit greatly from this, especially since the surfer will become more obvious and so emphasise the scale.
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything.
*** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
User avatar
stubbsy
Moderator
 
Posts: 10748
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
Location: Newcastle NSW - D700

Postby Matt. K on Mon Apr 10, 2006 9:21 pm

Andrew
I like these images. They are beautiful seascapes and I think your composition is excellent. Whilst Stubbsy is correct in that the waves are diminished in size because of the focal legth you used...the images work for me and would look brilliant printed very large and framed.
Regards

Matt. K
User avatar
Matt. K
Former Outstanding Member Of The Year and KM
 
Posts: 9981
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2004 7:12 pm
Location: North Nowra

Postby Alex on Mon Apr 10, 2006 10:17 pm

Some great shots there. I really like the composition of the 1st one and the last.

Alex
User avatar
Alex
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3465
Joined: Thu Feb 24, 2005 6:14 pm
Location: Melbourne - Nikon

Postby Steffen on Mon Apr 10, 2006 11:54 pm

I, too, like the first one the best, just go easy on the sharpening. While you may have missed your goal of illustrating the size of the swell, the foreground rocks certainly make for a dramatic perspective and carry the image.

Cheers
Steffen.
User avatar
Steffen
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1931
Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2005 4:52 pm
Location: Toongabbie, NSW

Postby ABG on Tue Apr 11, 2006 12:13 pm

shakey wrote:I like the composition of the first shot. However there is very visible sharpening artifact on the jutting out rocks on the right.

Thanks mate. Here's the same image with far less sharpening applied (amt - 40%, radius - 1.0, threshold - 1; original amt - 85, radius 1.0, treshold 1)
Image

The rock just jumped out at me, even when I was composing it in the viewfinder. I'm still at the steep end of the curve when it comes to PP and I still need to pay more attention to what I'm doing.

Thanks for the feedback.
Andrew
User avatar
ABG
Senior Member
 
Posts: 689
Joined: Mon Nov 14, 2005 1:53 pm
Location: Oatley, Sydney

Postby ABG on Tue Apr 11, 2006 12:42 pm

stubbsy wrote:ANdrew

You said it all in your precis. You needed more reach. There is way too much rock and not enough water in these which kills the scale of the scene. YOU know they were big waves, but in isolation the waves in the shots look small. The best thing I'd do with these is to crop out a LOT of the foreground rock. The last image in particular should benefit greatly from this, especially since the surfer will become more obvious and so emphasise the scale.


Thanks Peter. Here's a quick crop of the photo with the surfer and I agree it does tend to emphasize the size of the waves better. I think I still prefer the composition of the original however. Having realised I didn't have enough reach to capture the surfers in action, I decided instead to get some shots of the seascape.

Image

Here's another which shows the size of the swell even better, but I'm not really keen on the composition.

Image
Andrew
User avatar
ABG
Senior Member
 
Posts: 689
Joined: Mon Nov 14, 2005 1:53 pm
Location: Oatley, Sydney

Postby ABG on Tue Apr 11, 2006 12:57 pm

Matt. K wrote:Andrew
I like these images. They are beautiful seascapes and I think your composition is excellent. Whilst Stubbsy is correct in that the waves are diminished in size because of the focal legth you used...the images work for me and would look brilliant printed very large and framed.


Thanks Matt. That's high praise indeed coming from you :)

Can't say I quite agree with you though. While I like all of these shots, none of them are really good enough for a large print IMO. The composition is okay, but the light is a bit harsh for my liking.

All of these shots look washed out and nowhere near as defined as the original images I was working with. I'm capturing in Adobe RGB and then PP'ing in PS6. After re-sizing, I then save for web. Can you help me make the shots I'm posting look more like what I'm seeing on my screen?

Steffen and Alex, thanks for your comments too guys. Interestingly, my favourite is the third shot which no-one even mentioned, but it does look heaps better on my 'puter in full screen than what you guys are looking at.
Andrew
User avatar
ABG
Senior Member
 
Posts: 689
Joined: Mon Nov 14, 2005 1:53 pm
Location: Oatley, Sydney

Postby greencardigan on Tue Apr 11, 2006 1:38 pm

ABG wrote:All of these shots look washed out and nowhere near as defined as the original images I was working with. I'm capturing in Adobe RGB and then PP'ing in PS6. After re-sizing, I then save for web. Can you help me make the shots I'm posting look more like what I'm seeing on my screen?

I always thought 'save for web' was a no-no. Not sure why, but maybe that's why they don't look like your originals.
User avatar
greencardigan
Senior Member
 
Posts: 779
Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2005 4:00 pm
Location: Wollongong

Postby drifter on Tue Apr 11, 2006 6:00 pm

Also for the web you may want to work the shots in SRGB rather than Adobe .
Tony

Atheism is a non-prophet organisation.
User avatar
drifter
Member
 
Posts: 372
Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2005 8:37 pm
Location: Croydon -Sydney

Postby ABG on Tue Apr 11, 2006 10:15 pm

Thanks guys. I've just watched a fantastic tutorial on Radiant Vista http://www.radiantvista.com/video_tutorials/ which recommended saving for web, so I'm not sure why it'd be a no-no. It did show me that I need to change the colour profile from Adobe RGB to sRGB as drifter mentioned (something I haven't been doing and probably the cause of my issues).

I'm heading off with the family to Pambula tomorrow and will be doing a 3 day hike with my eldest son while we're away. I'll post some images when I get back home. Hopefully I'll remember to change the colour profile and see if that fixes the problems.

In the meantime, a happy Easter to all forum members. I hope everyone has a safe and relaxing holiday. Drive safely y'all.
Andrew
User avatar
ABG
Senior Member
 
Posts: 689
Joined: Mon Nov 14, 2005 1:53 pm
Location: Oatley, Sydney

Postby stubbsy on Tue Apr 11, 2006 10:50 pm

Andrew

The reason you'll see many of us say avoid Photoshop's Save For Web is because it discards all the EXIF info from the image in order to minimise file size. Losing EXIF is a BAD THING. eg look at any member's SmugMug or PBase or whatever site. They bristle with EXIF info which is wonderfully useful to others. If these were Saved for Web from Photoshop, there'd be no EXIF to educate and illuminate us about their image.

I look forward to your Easter images. Take care and have a great time with your family.
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything.
*** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
User avatar
stubbsy
Moderator
 
Posts: 10748
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
Location: Newcastle NSW - D700

Postby ABG on Tue Apr 11, 2006 11:02 pm

Thanks Peter. You've enlightened me once again :) The say you learn something every day and I've learnt quite a bit today.

I'll repeat the mantra while I'm away - don't use save for web, save for web bad :wink:

Thanks also for your kind thoughts. They are of course reciprocated.
Andrew
User avatar
ABG
Senior Member
 
Posts: 689
Joined: Mon Nov 14, 2005 1:53 pm
Location: Oatley, Sydney

Postby shakey on Tue Apr 11, 2006 11:05 pm

ABG wrote:I'm heading off with the family to Pambula tomorrow


Hey,

That's my neck of the woods!
Have a great time. There are some great photo ops around there.
User avatar
shakey
Senior Member
 
Posts: 696
Joined: Sat Apr 09, 2005 9:24 pm
Location: Far South Coast NSW

Postby ABG on Tue Apr 11, 2006 11:28 pm

shakey wrote:Hey,

That's my neck of the woods!
Have a great time. There are some great photo ops around there.


PM sent
Andrew
User avatar
ABG
Senior Member
 
Posts: 689
Joined: Mon Nov 14, 2005 1:53 pm
Location: Oatley, Sydney


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques