Moon over Tomaree

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Moon over Tomaree

Postby stubbsy on Mon Apr 17, 2006 12:26 am

I took this image on Saturday night from the inner lighthouse at Port Stephens looking east towards Tomaree headland.

This was one of the most difficult exposures I have ever taken. It's a tripod mounted shot (doh!) and is a merge of two 30 second exposures with different exposure compensation values (one at 0, the other at +2 EV). Shot at F16 with the 24-120 VR lens. When I get my main PC back and have CS2 I'll have a go at a high dynamic range version, but for now I'm happy with this, blown highlights and all! Click for a larger version. Any tips on improving this would be greatly appreciated.

[url=http://stubbsy.smugmug.com/photos/64677815-O.jpg]Image
[/url]
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything.
*** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
User avatar
stubbsy
Moderator
 
Posts: 10748
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
Location: Newcastle NSW - D700

Postby leek on Mon Apr 17, 2006 12:33 am

Very nice Peter... Apart from what appears to be a slight tilt, it looks great... I'll be interested to see what emerges from the HDR version as it would've been good to have a little more detail in those highlights...

P.S. I think you meant Duh! rather than Doh! - you know how important it is not to get those two words mixed up :-) ;-)
Cheers, John
Leek@Flickr | Leek@RedBubble | Leek@DeviantArt

D700; D200; Tokina 12-24; Nikkor 50mm f1.4,18-70mm,85mm f1.8, 105mm,80-400VR, SB-800s; G1227LVL; RRS BH-55; Feisol 1401
User avatar
leek
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3135
Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 4:46 pm
Location: Lane Cove, Sydney

Postby avkomp on Mon Apr 17, 2006 12:36 am

I will wait for the hdr version.

the whites are sooooo much different than the rest of the image at the moment

seems to have promise though

Steve
check out my image gallery @
http://photography.avkomp.com/gallery3
User avatar
avkomp
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2485
Joined: Sun May 29, 2005 8:47 pm
Location: Bendoura NSW - Nikon D5

Postby wmaburnett on Mon Apr 17, 2006 4:16 am

Beautiful! nice reflections and the clouds and deep blue are amazing! i wonder what it would look like with a ND filter? do you think the blown out mood would be saved but preserve the detail of the clouds?
Nikon D70s, Nikkor 18-70 3.5-5-6 DX AF-S, Nikkor 80-200 2.8D ED, Nikkor 60 2.8D Micro, SB-600 Flash, Kingston 1GB CF card.
Http://www.WBurnett.com
wmaburnett
Member
 
Posts: 249
Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2005 7:00 am
Location: Minnesota, United States

Postby Killakoala on Mon Apr 17, 2006 8:21 am

Great imagery Peter. Try a high contrast B&W when you've finished with your other PP. Ansell Adams might have enjoyed that view too :)
Steve.
|D700| D2H | F5 | 70-200VR | 85 1.4 | 50 1.4 | 28-70 | 10.5 | 12-24 | SB800 |
Website-> http://www.stevekilburn.com
Leeds United for promotion in 2014 - Hurrah!!!
User avatar
Killakoala
Senior Member
 
Posts: 5398
Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2004 3:31 pm
Location: Southland NZ

Postby big pix on Mon Apr 17, 2006 8:32 am

I have moved my book from the left side to the right side of my monitor, just a small book....... great image.......
Cheers ....bp....
Difference between a good street photographer and a great street photographer....
Removing objects that do not belong...
happy for the comments, but
.....Please DO NOT edit my image.....
http://bigpix.smugmug.com Forever changing
User avatar
big pix
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4513
Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 11:52 pm
Location: Lake Macquarie NSW.

Re: Moon over Tomaree

Postby Gordon on Mon Apr 17, 2006 8:36 am

stubbsy wrote:... a merge of two 30 second exposures with different exposure compensation values (one at 0, the other at +2 EV). Shot at F16 with the 24-120 VR lens....


I'll also be interested to see if you can bring much more out with the larger dynamic range, although I suspect the dark areas such as the headland will look a bit noisy and may be best left as a silhouette. I like the colour of the water and sky due to the bright moonlight, and softness of the water surface and some of the clouds caused by a bit of movement over the duration of the exposures. Did you use NR? What ISO?

Surely if you took 2 exposures at 30 sec and f/16 they would have been manual exposures and the exposure compensation is meaningless? EC only changes the value the light meter shows and wont change the actual exposure when you manually set it.... or do you mean you adjusted the ISO by 2 stops for one exposure?

Gordon
D70, D200, CP5700
User avatar
Gordon
Member
 
Posts: 436
Joined: Fri Feb 18, 2005 11:04 pm
Location: Loomberah/Siding Spring Observatory

Postby radar on Mon Apr 17, 2006 11:41 am

Great shot Peter,

It would have been a pretty special spot with the moonrise. Looking forward to the next version.

cheers,

André
Photography, as a powerful medium of expression and communications, offers an infinite variety of perception, interpretation and execution. Ansel Adams

(misc Nikon stuff)
User avatar
radar
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2823
Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2005 11:18 am
Location: Lake Macquarie (Newcastle) - D700, D7000

Postby stubbsy on Mon Apr 17, 2006 7:20 pm

Thanks for all the comments people. Will be a few weeks before I get the HDR done, but in the meanitme I may have a go at a B & W for you Steve
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything.
*** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
User avatar
stubbsy
Moderator
 
Posts: 10748
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
Location: Newcastle NSW - D700

Postby stubbsy on Tue Apr 18, 2006 10:07 pm

Now here's a question for any HDR gurus - will this work if the whites of this are still a little bright in the "darker" of the 2 imges I have or would I be better to clone the reflextion and moon in from some other images which have slightly different zoom on them?
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything.
*** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
User avatar
stubbsy
Moderator
 
Posts: 10748
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
Location: Newcastle NSW - D700

Postby Matt. K on Tue Apr 18, 2006 10:26 pm

Peter
Despite all of the trouble you took to put this image together...it doesn't work for me. It's the composition....the dark foreground holds the eye for a second and then the eye shoots along the reflection up to a featureless hot-moon. The moon shoots back into my eye and I'm done. If I look again then exactly the same thing happens again. The image is remarkable in that it's composition is almost designed to make the viewer look elsewhere. There...I hope I wasn't too harsh? :D :D :D
Regards

Matt. K
User avatar
Matt. K
Former Outstanding Member Of The Year and KM
 
Posts: 9981
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2004 7:12 pm
Location: North Nowra

Postby the foto fanatic on Tue Apr 18, 2006 10:35 pm

The image doesn't quite work for me in its current state either. And I think it is the contrast between the underexposed elements of the picture and the blown highlights.

But I am prepared to wait for the final version before writing it off.

Also, I do not think the picture is tilted. When the camera is not square to a horizon that recedes it does give the impression of a tilted viewfinder - I think that is what we see here.
TFF (Trevor)
My History Blog: Your Brisbane: Past & Present
My Photo Blog: The Foto Fanatic
Nikon stuff!
User avatar
the foto fanatic
Moderator
 
Posts: 4212
Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2004 7:53 pm
Location: Teneriffe, Brisbane

Postby huynhie on Wed Apr 19, 2006 8:42 am

The conditions were quite tricky with this shot, I was not very happy with my pics.
User avatar
huynhie
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1476
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 12:11 pm
Location: Sydney


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques