Does this photo work.

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Does this photo work.

Postby Alex on Mon Apr 17, 2006 1:23 pm

I know the DOF is too shallow and you can see part of this child's face not being sharp, but somehow I like this photo.
Taken with Nikkor 50 mm f1.4 1/90, f1.7, iso1250. Only slight curves and very slight sharpening by saving for web using bicubic sharper option.

Comments will be appreciated. Thanks.

Alex

Image
User avatar
Alex
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3465
Joined: Thu Feb 24, 2005 6:14 pm
Location: Melbourne - Nikon

Postby Marvin on Mon Apr 17, 2006 3:33 pm

I don't think the dof is too shallow as you can see his eyes are sharp. I am quite drawn to them and think they are the focal point. I don't find the fact that part of his head is cut off annoying but the bright balls(?) are slightly distracting.
Nikon D7000
User avatar
Marvin
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1486
Joined: Tue Aug 10, 2004 9:33 pm
Location: Back in the hot Riverland, SA.

Postby mudder on Mon Apr 17, 2006 3:44 pm

G'day mate,

The narrow DOF makes the viewer concentrate their attention on the child's eyes, which is exactly what you want...

The narrow DOF also reduces the attention on the brightly colored balls in the background... Hmmm, wonder if it's worth doing a de-sat on the background???

Big beautiful eyes, I think it's a great portrait and I can see why you'd like it...
Aka Andrew
User avatar
mudder
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3020
Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2004 5:58 pm
Location: Melbourne - Burwood East

Postby Alex on Mon Apr 17, 2006 4:45 pm

Thanks a lot, guys. I will try to desaturate the background.

Alex
User avatar
Alex
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3465
Joined: Thu Feb 24, 2005 6:14 pm
Location: Melbourne - Nikon

Postby Bob G on Mon Apr 17, 2006 5:18 pm

I like it overall and agree with other comments.

Maybe the number of highlights (7) on each eye is a bit distracting also.


Bob G
Bob
"Wake up and smell the pixels!"
User avatar
Bob G
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1035
Joined: Tue Mar 14, 2006 1:52 am
Location: Mooloolaba, Sunshine Coast, Qld.

Postby shutterbug on Mon Apr 17, 2006 5:23 pm

It works great, love it.
User avatar
shutterbug
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1853
Joined: Fri Jan 07, 2005 11:32 am
Location: A Pub in Sydney / Bankstown

Postby Alex on Mon Apr 17, 2006 5:55 pm

Thanks, Vincent.

I prepared a partially desaturated version, but I think I still prefer the coloured one.

Alex

Image
User avatar
Alex
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3465
Joined: Thu Feb 24, 2005 6:14 pm
Location: Melbourne - Nikon

Postby blacknstormy on Mon Apr 17, 2006 8:24 pm

Alex - I prefer the colour shot - maybe just a little dodging on the brightest balls to tone down the effect? Just an idea - I agree with you though - love the focus on the eyes :)
Rel
Dodging and burning are steps to take care of mistakes God made in establishing tonal relationships! -Ansel Adams

http://www.redbubble.com/people/blacknstormy
User avatar
blacknstormy
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2745
Joined: Wed Dec 29, 2004 3:33 pm
Location: Ipswich Qld

Postby Alex on Mon Apr 17, 2006 10:35 pm

Thank you, Rel. Will try to reach a compromise in partially desaturating the background.

Alex
User avatar
Alex
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3465
Joined: Thu Feb 24, 2005 6:14 pm
Location: Melbourne - Nikon

Postby Geoff on Mon Apr 17, 2006 10:50 pm

Excellent portrait - I too prefer the colour image. You've done well and PP excellent, for such a high ISO, there is minimal noise.
Geoff
Special Moments Photography
Nikon D700, 50mm 1.4, 85mm 1.4, 70-200 2.8VR, SB800 & some simple studio stuff.
User avatar
Geoff
Moderator
 
Posts: 7791
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 12:08 am
Location: Freshwater - Northern Beaches, Sydney.

Postby Alex on Mon Apr 17, 2006 11:46 pm

Thanks, Geoff.

Alex
User avatar
Alex
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3465
Joined: Thu Feb 24, 2005 6:14 pm
Location: Melbourne - Nikon

Postby PiroStitch on Tue Apr 18, 2006 1:49 am

Great shot Alex - I prefer the colour version and see if you can do something about the highlights in his eyes. 7 dots is a bit creepy....a bit like a spider :)
Hassy, Leica, Nikon, iPhone
Come follow the rabbit hole...
User avatar
PiroStitch
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4669
Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2005 1:08 am
Location: Hong Kong

Postby Alex on Tue Apr 18, 2006 10:46 am

PiroStitch wrote:Great shot Alex - I prefer the colour version and see if you can do something about the highlights in his eyes. 7 dots is a bit creepy....a bit like a spider :)
 LOL! Thanks, Wayne.

Alex
User avatar
Alex
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3465
Joined: Thu Feb 24, 2005 6:14 pm
Location: Melbourne - Nikon

Postby ozimax on Tue Apr 18, 2006 12:23 pm

I like the second image, definitely draws more to the face than to the coloured balls.
President, A.A.A.A.A (Australian Association Against Acronym Abuse)
Canon EOS R6, RF 24-105 F4, RF 70-200 F4, RF 35mm F1.8, RF 16mm F2.8
"And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free." (John 8:32)
User avatar
ozimax
Senior Member
 
Posts: 5289
Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2005 11:58 am
Location: Coffs Harbour, NSW

Postby Sheila Smart on Tue Apr 18, 2006 4:24 pm

I love it, Alex - both the coloured and the desaturated look. The DOF is spot on in my opinion. Well done. Its a wall hanger.

Cheers
Sheila
Sheila Smart
Canon 5D and various Ls
Black and White Spider Award 2005 - Photographer of the Year - amateur
On-line Gallery here
Sheila Smart
Member
 
Posts: 477
Joined: Sun Jan 15, 2006 10:20 am
Location: Avalon Beach, NSW

Postby wendellt on Tue Apr 18, 2006 4:31 pm

the differential focus is great and the colours too, perhaps just recrop and centre the head
User avatar
wendellt
Outstanding Member of the year (Don't try this at home.)
 
Posts: 4078
Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2005 10:04 am
Location: Dilettante Outside the City Walls, Sydney

Postby Alex on Tue Apr 18, 2006 5:08 pm

Thanks for the comments, Sheila and Wendell - this is encouraging.

Cheers
Alex
User avatar
Alex
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3465
Joined: Thu Feb 24, 2005 6:14 pm
Location: Melbourne - Nikon

Hi

Postby yeocsa on Tue Apr 18, 2006 8:15 pm

Hi Alex,

The picture is very well captured. Nice and sharp. Good control of dof. Only 2 things you need to work on for this one. The background is too distracting. The primary element are the boy's eyes not the background. Use some software to remove the noise.

You have improved lots. :wink:

regards,

Arthur
yeocsa
Senior Member
 
Posts: 966
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 12:04 pm
Location: Melbourne

Postby Dug on Tue Apr 18, 2006 9:03 pm

DOF great
colour background good
angle looking down on child, I don't like looking down photos.
Facial expression Sorry I don't like it it is neither happy or sad.

Maybe if I knew the child but as an impartial viewer it does nothing for me.

My option would be get down low and play with the kid smile of cry any simple emotion or expression get him to lie on his back on the ball if you have to try, different angles.

cheers Doug
User avatar
Dug
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1082
Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2005 7:58 pm
Location: maroochydore Q

Re: Hi

Postby Alex on Tue Apr 18, 2006 9:47 pm

yeocsa wrote:Hi Alex,

The picture is very well captured. Nice and sharp. Good control of dof. Only 2 things you need to work on for this one. The background is too distracting. The primary element are the boy's eyes not the background. Use some software to remove the noise.

You have improved lots. :wink:

regards,

Arthur


Thanks Arthur! Haven't seen you post much. Where have you been??

Alex
User avatar
Alex
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3465
Joined: Thu Feb 24, 2005 6:14 pm
Location: Melbourne - Nikon

Postby Alex on Tue Apr 18, 2006 9:48 pm

Dug wrote:DOF great
colour background good
angle looking down on child, I don't like looking down photos.
Facial expression Sorry I don't like it it is neither happy or sad.

Maybe if I knew the child but as an impartial viewer it does nothing for me.

My option would be get down low and play with the kid smile of cry any simple emotion or expression get him to lie on his back on the ball if you have to try, different angles.

cheers Doug


Dug,

Thanks for the suggestions. Will try it next time.

Alex
User avatar
Alex
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3465
Joined: Thu Feb 24, 2005 6:14 pm
Location: Melbourne - Nikon

Re: Hi

Postby yeocsa on Wed Apr 19, 2006 11:38 am

Alex wrote:
yeocsa wrote:Hi Alex,

The picture is very well captured. Nice and sharp. Good control of dof. Only 2 things you need to work on for this one. The background is too distracting. The primary element are the boy's eyes not the background. Use some software to remove the noise.

You have improved lots. :wink:

regards,

Arthur


Thanks Arthur! Haven't seen you post much. Where have you been??

Alex


Hi Alex,

I am been busy freelancing some web projects.

regards,

Arthur
yeocsa
Senior Member
 
Posts: 966
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 12:04 pm
Location: Melbourne


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques