I decided to get out an old pic I haven't previously PP'd and keep myself aquainted with PS.
Let me know what you think criticism wise.

larger image.
http://static.flickr.com/56/131815883_4180065974_o.jpg
thanks Michael
Elle's portraitModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
13 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Elle's portraitSo I've been without a camera for a number of weeks now which means photoshop has been getting a touch neglected.
I decided to get out an old pic I haven't previously PP'd and keep myself aquainted with PS. Let me know what you think criticism wise. ![]() larger image. http://static.flickr.com/56/131815883_4180065974_o.jpg thanks Michael Are we there yet?
Maybe a little dodging and burning to add more depth would be good Michael. Especially around any mild shadowing or midtone areas, this will add dimension.
I find as a rule a lot of mono conversions lack contrast. This can easily be overcome by going a bit more on the extreme side of contrast enhancement at first and then backing off bit by bit to come up with a more striking result. Most conversions today, through lack of experience, seem to end up with a flat looking image. correct me if im wrong. Cheers Jethro shoot it real.
look! and see. Shoot and feel
Where in particular would you suggest I dodge and or burn for future reference?
For the record I also wanted to keep a bit of detail on her skin with this BW conversion the curve was at a pretty steep angle so I had to tweak it alot to get a happy medium between contrast and detail. Are we there yet?
I love it just as it is. Great shot of a beautiful woman - fantastic sharpness, control of DOF and expression. If I was nitpickicking I'd like to have both eyes sharp, but in all honesty it doesn't matter here - it's a lovely portrait.
No offence Jethro, but I prefer the original image. I think her skin looks much nicer in the first, and yours has brought out some dark areas on her face which weren't a problem to begin with.
As you say, everyone's got their own take. Cheers,
macka a.k.a. Kris
Thanks for your input everyone it's very helpful!
I can't understand why I didn't see this oppertunity the first time I looked through these photos months ago. perhaps its like leftover food after a couple of days in the fridge it tastes even better? Are we there yet?
Lol, I get the same thing going through old shots days/weeks/months later dude ![]() ..:: http://www.flickr.com/photos/nicknav ::..
..:: http://vortsekz.info ::.. ..:: http://vorty.deviantart.com ::.. D70, 50/1.8, 18-70/3.5-4.5, TLZ2, 1GB Ultra II CF
I like this a lot, maybe if they eyes were a little lighter with more detail, but anywho! Great shot!
~William Nikon D70s, Nikkor 18-70 3.5-5-6 DX AF-S, Nikkor 80-200 2.8D ED, Nikkor 60 2.8D Micro, SB-600 Flash, Kingston 1GB CF card.
Http://www.WBurnett.com
Previous topic • Next topic
13 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|