Elle's portrait

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Elle's portrait

Postby Michael on Thu Apr 20, 2006 9:53 pm

So I've been without a camera for a number of weeks now which means photoshop has been getting a touch neglected.

I decided to get out an old pic I haven't previously PP'd and keep myself aquainted with PS.

Let me know what you think criticism wise.

Image



larger image.

http://static.flickr.com/56/131815883_4180065974_o.jpg


thanks Michael
Are we there yet?
User avatar
Michael
Senior Member
 
Posts: 685
Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2005 8:48 pm
Location: Toowoomba QLD

Postby jethro on Thu Apr 20, 2006 10:00 pm

Maybe a little dodging and burning to add more depth would be good Michael. Especially around any mild shadowing or midtone areas, this will add dimension.
I find as a rule a lot of mono conversions lack contrast. This can easily be overcome by going a bit more on the extreme side of contrast enhancement at first and then backing off bit by bit to come up with a more striking result.
Most conversions today, through lack of experience, seem to end up with a flat looking image. correct me if im wrong.

Cheers Jethro
shoot it real.

look! and see. Shoot and feel
User avatar
jethro
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1006
Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2004 10:03 pm
Location: down south, sydney

Postby Michael on Thu Apr 20, 2006 10:02 pm

Where in particular would you suggest I dodge and or burn for future reference?

For the record I also wanted to keep a bit of detail on her skin with this BW conversion the curve was at a pretty steep angle so I had to tweak it alot to get a happy medium between contrast and detail.
Are we there yet?
User avatar
Michael
Senior Member
 
Posts: 685
Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2005 8:48 pm
Location: Toowoomba QLD

Postby rooboy on Thu Apr 20, 2006 10:11 pm

I love it just as it is. Great shot of a beautiful woman - fantastic sharpness, control of DOF and expression. If I was nitpickicking I'd like to have both eyes sharp, but in all honesty it doesn't matter here - it's a lovely portrait.
User avatar
rooboy
Member
 
Posts: 479
Joined: Wed Nov 02, 2005 9:14 am
Location: Maroubra, Sydney

Postby owen on Thu Apr 20, 2006 10:16 pm

The only thing I can say against this photo is the angular shadow on her neck. Other than that it's great. Pretty model, good depth of field, good depth to the shot (ie the model is very 3d, rather than flat looking) I think the pose as well as the lighting contribute to that.
http://www.ausphotos.com - My Gallery

http://www.doesgodexist.com - a very interesting site.
User avatar
owen
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1699
Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2005 3:21 pm
Location: Nowra, NSW

Postby jethro on Thu Apr 20, 2006 10:23 pm

Michael, I hope you dont mind an edit this is more contrast IMO

Image

Everyone has a different slant on BW i must say.
By the way your image is as SAS.
Jethro
shoot it real.

look! and see. Shoot and feel
User avatar
jethro
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1006
Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2004 10:03 pm
Location: down south, sydney

Postby macka on Thu Apr 20, 2006 10:26 pm

No offence Jethro, but I prefer the original image. I think her skin looks much nicer in the first, and yours has brought out some dark areas on her face which weren't a problem to begin with.

As you say, everyone's got their own take.
Cheers,

macka
a.k.a. Kris
User avatar
macka
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1092
Joined: Sat Dec 31, 2005 4:18 pm
Location: North Rocks, Sydney

Postby Michael on Thu Apr 20, 2006 10:43 pm

Thanks for your input everyone it's very helpful!

I can't understand why I didn't see this oppertunity the first time I looked through these photos months ago.

perhaps its like leftover food after a couple of days in the fridge it tastes even better?
Are we there yet?
User avatar
Michael
Senior Member
 
Posts: 685
Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2005 8:48 pm
Location: Toowoomba QLD

Postby marcotrov on Thu Apr 20, 2006 11:50 pm

Great tone, compositional control (though I may have been tempted to drop the camera view height just a fraction) and DOF michael beautifully taken portrait.
cheers
marco
marcotrov
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2577
Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:21 pm
Location: Cairns, Queensland, Australia

Postby vort on Fri Apr 21, 2006 1:28 am

Michael wrote:Thanks for your input everyone it's very helpful!

I can't understand why I didn't see this oppertunity the first time I looked through these photos months ago.

perhaps its like leftover food after a couple of days in the fridge it tastes even better?


Lol, I get the same thing going through old shots days/weeks/months later dude :)
..:: http://www.flickr.com/photos/nicknav ::..
..:: http://vortsekz.info ::..
..:: http://vorty.deviantart.com ::..
D70, 50/1.8, 18-70/3.5-4.5, TLZ2, 1GB Ultra II CF
User avatar
vort
Member
 
Posts: 124
Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 4:54 pm
Location: Balmoral, Brisbane

Postby Sera on Fri Apr 21, 2006 9:19 am

IMO it's a great shot, Michael. The only thing I can nitpick is that for my tastes the DOF is a little too narrow. Otherwise it's great! :)
Tim
Nikon D70 user and forum lurker.
User avatar
Sera
Newbie
 
Posts: 4
Joined: Thu Oct 13, 2005 12:09 pm
Location: Newcastle, NSW

Postby wmaburnett on Fri Apr 21, 2006 9:54 am

I like this a lot, maybe if they eyes were a little lighter with more detail, but anywho! Great shot!
~William
Nikon D70s, Nikkor 18-70 3.5-5-6 DX AF-S, Nikkor 80-200 2.8D ED, Nikkor 60 2.8D Micro, SB-600 Flash, Kingston 1GB CF card.
Http://www.WBurnett.com
wmaburnett
Member
 
Posts: 249
Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2005 7:00 am
Location: Minnesota, United States

Postby Michael on Fri Apr 21, 2006 2:35 pm

Thanks everyone

The suggestions are something I will try to remember to incorporate into future portraits.
Are we there yet?
User avatar
Michael
Senior Member
 
Posts: 685
Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2005 8:48 pm
Location: Toowoomba QLD


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques