Brett


acouple of shots at the seawayModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
2 posts
• Page 1 of 1
acouple of shots at the seawayI had a day down at the goldcoast seaway before xmas. Teh fisherman was just a candid shot taken and the shag was trying to score a feed around the rocks. C&C welcome both photos have had no pp.
Brett ![]() ![]() More fishing, more sport, more photo's Pentax 1stds
Number #1 - no real centre of interest in the photo. All have their backs turned and none are "fishing" (all are sitting, walking or baiting)
Number #2 - the shag is so small I almost missed it - so it just ends up a shot of the water and some rocks Get closer to your subjects and simplify the content of the photos Hope this helps ![]()
Previous topic • Next topic
2 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|