a question of saturation

Posted:
Sat Apr 29, 2006 7:23 pm
by kenny12
1.
2.
3.
take your pick, or make your own

i can't decide on what saturation i should use.
oh and the kit lense with the 20D isn't THAT bad

but i know i'll be getting some nicer ones soon ^^

Posted:
Sat Apr 29, 2006 7:50 pm
by NikonUser
#3 for me
(But I often get told I oversaturate my images

)
Paul

Posted:
Sat Apr 29, 2006 8:08 pm
by Six
I would go with something like this:


Posted:
Sat Apr 29, 2006 9:14 pm
by PiroStitch
err i don't really see a difference. is it supposed to be obvious or subtle?
Also can you please reduce the size of the images? If I was using the desktop I wouldn't mind as much as the pic would fit on the screen but at 1024x768 res on the laptop, i can't see the entire pic - hence the increased probability of me not noticing anything with the three versions.

Posted:
Sun Apr 30, 2006 12:02 am
by gstark
Kenny,
Pirostich makes a valid point here regarding the image sizes.
A couple, really. As a general guide, the maxium size of any side - width or height - should not be greater than 800 pixels. Your images' width is somewhat greater than this, but for one image, or a couple, this wouldn't be a major problem.
But in this case you're asking that we compare A with B with C, and with images this large, and even with a fairly large screen, one can only see on and a bit images at any one time, thus making the comparisons you're asking us to do somewhat difficult.
So, for this sort of task, it would be far more productive, I think, to use much smaller images, allowing at least two images to be fully seen within the context of the compariosns that you're asking to be done.
As it stands now, you've possibly turned off more than a few people from offering comments, simply because of your presentation.

Posted:
Sun Apr 30, 2006 12:29 am
by kenny12
i see. i'll resize them in the morning or when i have time next.
i didn't expect so many people to be using such a low resolution