
Sunset over waterModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
7 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Sunset over waterHey guys, i really like what this image could have been, but im not sure if i have pp it correctly. I had a play with the shadows to try and bring out the trees some more but i think it may look a bit silly. Please tell me what you think.
![]() http://flickr.com/photos/jamesthomsonphotography/
http://ausrock87.deviantart.com/ D700 | D200 (retired) | F80 |
James
Yes it looks a bit silly. Tone down the Shadow/Highlights adjustment and try again. This is a good image and just needs a better PP treatment. Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything. *** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
Number 2
![]() and another i have just pped ![]() http://flickr.com/photos/jamesthomsonphotography/
http://ausrock87.deviantart.com/ D700 | D200 (retired) | F80 |
James
Still no good FOR ME, of course it may be fine for you ![]() Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything. *** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
The landscape version has merit as the clouds tend to lead the eye to the horizon, however the lack of contrast and sharpness IMHO puts the pic down.
Also can you please reduce the size of the pics to 800 pixels width (maximum) - it'll help the users on smaller screen res ![]() Hassy, Leica, Nikon, iPhone
Come follow the rabbit hole...
James
Here's a quick and dirty of what I'm talking about. I reduced the saturation slightly, increased the contrast and added a graduated neutral density filter effect to lighten the top & darken the bottom. If you don't want me playing with your image, just say and I'll delete it. ![]() Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything. *** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
thanks for the help peter, I have a bit of a problem of not being able to start afresh with pp. Once i have one result the rest seem to end up that way.
using your version i am going to go and have another crack, which should be alot easier now htat i have a reference BTW I really like your version http://flickr.com/photos/jamesthomsonphotography/
http://ausrock87.deviantart.com/ D700 | D200 (retired) | F80 |
Previous topic • Next topic
7 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|