Page 1 of 1
Holland? Sydney?

Posted:
Mon May 01, 2006 11:23 pm
by stubbsy
Here are two pics (more
here) taken at a quaint little place called Holland House that I was introduced to by Matt K and his delightful wife. Both images were taken at ISO 640 using the 24-120VR and then processed using DxO Optics Pro. I find DxO handles these dark and potentially noisy images particularly well.


Posted:
Mon May 01, 2006 11:25 pm
by Alpha_7
Gorgeous and Quaint sums it up nicely, a great find, and I'm not surprised MattK and Phillo find it out.
So next question, what's the food like ?

Posted:
Mon May 01, 2006 11:27 pm
by nito
The shots are very nice interior photos peter. It has lots of warm and inviting colours. Very homely.
I had a go of DxO and it truely does handle low light conversions well. Too bad it runs as fast a a one leg dog on my computer. It took 3-4mins an image! Dam the 512Mb RAM to hell.

Posted:
Tue May 02, 2006 1:35 am
by PiroStitch
Can't think of a thing to criticise about the pics as I like everything about it.

Posted:
Tue May 02, 2006 3:33 am
by Michael
Where is the kid that had his finger in the dyke?
sorry lame I know.
nice shots stubbsy looks nice and warm, something my room isnt very at the moment.

Posted:
Tue May 02, 2006 7:32 am
by the foto fanatic
Great pix Peter, and I agree with your comments about DxO and darker images. Whatever curve(s) they use sure manage to bring out the detail with little or no noise.
I have a question or two about workflow. I guess you would process your RAW file with DxO and then transfer to
PS? Do you run DxO on auto, or do you use "expert"? I notice DxO applies its own sharpening based on camera
model - do you apply sharpening here? Do you run all your images through DxO, or just selected ones?
Thanks in anticipation.

Posted:
Tue May 02, 2006 9:26 am
by Alex
Nice. I like these a lot.
Alex

Posted:
Tue May 02, 2006 10:21 am
by stubbsy
cricketfan wrote:Great pix Peter, and I agree with your comments about DxO and darker images. Whatever curve(s) they use sure manage to bring out the detail with little or no noise.
I have a question or two about workflow. I guess you would process your RAW file with DxO and then transfer to
PS? Do you run DxO on auto, or do you use "expert"? I notice DxO applies its own sharpening based on camera
model - do you apply sharpening here? Do you run all your images through DxO, or just selected ones?
Thanks in anticipation.
Trevor
I run DxO on auto and let it do the lot (lazy I know) then save as dng and open in Photoshop for any final tweaks (eg in the last image I used a nik Color Efex grad ND Filter to balance the light in the image by making the RHS slightly lighter and the left darker). In most cases it only goes to Photoshop to frame and resize for the web.
BTW I only use DxO when I need it, I don't run everything through it.

Posted:
Tue May 02, 2006 10:24 am
by stubbsy
Thank you all for your comments.
Craig - food was traditional Dutch and we had breakfast - some sort of deep fried sausage shaped croquette with stuff of the texture of pate inside it and pickled herrings.
Nghia - I have 2gb RAM and it works fine. RAM is cheap (unless it's RDRAM) - upgrade. How on earth do you crank up Photoshop with 512Mb (windoze would eat most of that)

Posted:
Tue May 02, 2006 10:28 am
by sirhc55
Peter - the first image is quite exquisite and has so much within the image that I could look at it for hours.
The second image, IMO, is destroyed by the overerly bright lamp which keeps dragging my eye to it.

Posted:
Tue May 02, 2006 10:55 am
by avkomp
really like the first
steve

Posted:
Tue May 02, 2006 8:46 pm
by stubbsy
Chris, Steve - Thanks for your comments.
Chris - I agree about the light which is a real shit since I like the tonings of the rest of the image. I tried all I could to darken the #%$%!@ thing, but it always made the image look weird. So I've bitten the bullet & cloned the bastard out completely. Is this better?


Posted:
Tue May 02, 2006 10:31 pm
by nito

Posted:
Tue May 02, 2006 10:42 pm
by stubbsy
Nghia
I went from a 512Mb P3 to a 2Gb P4 and suddenly photoshop was on steroids and Nikon Capture seemed speedy. Enjoy.

Posted:
Tue May 02, 2006 10:48 pm
by nito
I certainly will, photoshop and all the RAW stuff will be much more fun and enjoyable now.


Posted:
Wed May 03, 2006 12:06 am
by Alpha_7
I went to swap my ram between laptops so my "current" PP laptop had 1Gb instead of 512mb, but I can't find my mini screwdrivers


Posted:
Wed May 03, 2006 12:16 am
by sirhc55