
Felt it could be recovered so after some pp, ended up with this. It was formatted for viewing as part of a slideshow for viewing on a widescreen tv.

I'm happy with the result but suggestions for improvement would be appreciated.
Cheers, John
A bit of ppModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
7 posts
• Page 1 of 1
A bit of ppTook this shot during a recent outing and wasn't happy with it.
![]() Felt it could be recovered so after some pp, ended up with this. It was formatted for viewing as part of a slideshow for viewing on a widescreen tv. ![]() I'm happy with the result but suggestions for improvement would be appreciated. Cheers, John JED
Nikon D600, D7000, D90, 70-300 D, 50mm f1.8, 85mm f1.8, 105mm macro f2.8, 18-70 kit lens, 35mm f1.8 dx, sigma 10-20 dx, SB600, SB80dx, Metz 45ct4, & other stuff. Why are there no cheap hobbies?
John,
Good work there. I'd probably cut back on the sharpening; it seems overdone to me. Look at the girl's arms and hat (look at the bright line the deliniates their edges), and in particular, her fingers which look almost like claws. I think that these artefacts are due to some element of overshapenng, and thus pulling back should help with this aspect of the image. Cheerz. g.
Gary Stark Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
Thanks for that, Gary.
Yes, I did hit the sharpening a bit too hard. Trying to lift the detail a bit more. The whole image is soft, slow shutter speed, fast moving kid, lousy technique. Will play some more. Cheers. JED
Nikon D600, D7000, D90, 70-300 D, 50mm f1.8, 85mm f1.8, 105mm macro f2.8, 18-70 kit lens, 35mm f1.8 dx, sigma 10-20 dx, SB600, SB80dx, Metz 45ct4, & other stuff. Why are there no cheap hobbies?
Just came across this image and had to stop and say that I love what you've done with the PP... The sharpening does seem a tad strong and in this image I'm not sure if sharpness is what you're really after, it comes across as an ideal image to have that dreamy, romantic, soft focus sort of look...
Excellent recovery job I reckon... Aka Andrew
Thanks for all your comments. Much appreciated.
I've had another crack at it. Reshaped the finger and used minimal sharpening this time which I feel has improved it. ![]() Cheers, John JED
Nikon D600, D7000, D90, 70-300 D, 50mm f1.8, 85mm f1.8, 105mm macro f2.8, 18-70 kit lens, 35mm f1.8 dx, sigma 10-20 dx, SB600, SB80dx, Metz 45ct4, & other stuff. Why are there no cheap hobbies?
Previous topic • Next topic
7 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|