Portrait Recovery..

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Portrait Recovery..

Postby Alpha_7 on Mon May 08, 2006 11:16 pm

Well after a night out shooting I came back and found in general a lot of shitty shots, this was one of them, but I really tried hard to recover it from the RAW which was soft and noisey. So how did I do, would this shot pass for ok, if not is there anything else I can do?

I'd appreciate any advice - thanks.

Image
ISO 800, F2.8, 1.13sec, 125mm (using the 80-200)
User avatar
Alpha_7
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7259
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 6:19 pm
Location: Mortdale - Sydney - Nikon D700, x-D200, Leica, G9

Postby daniel_r on Mon May 08, 2006 11:24 pm

It's good, particularly so given the exposure time (your model must have held very still).

The only thing I can fault in your exposure / processing is that it's a bit muddy - as in no real white definition to balance the image out. From a quick play around, I tried adding a brightness/contrast bump of +10 on the brightness. Seemed to clean it up a bit and brought back some of the lighter tones.
D.
Daniel_R's Flickr gallery
I shoot with Nikon stuff.
User avatar
daniel_r
Senior Member
 
Posts: 749
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2005 1:58 pm
Location: Canberra, ACT.

Re: Portrait Recovery..

Postby rooboy on Mon May 08, 2006 11:26 pm

Alpha_7 wrote: 1.13sec


I'd say that's your problem. ISO 1600 @ 1/2 sec (or even pushed RAW files @ 1/4 sec) might have been more successful.

It's a good shot, showing a lot of character, but at that size it's quite soft on the lower half of her face.

Maybe try lightening it up a bit to draw attention away from the softer bottom half to the eyes, which seem sharp?
So join in the chorus, and sing it one and all!
User avatar
rooboy
Member
 
Posts: 479
Joined: Wed Nov 02, 2005 9:14 am
Location: Maroubra, Sydney

Postby daniel_r on Mon May 08, 2006 11:26 pm

Just checked again in PS CS - there's a bit of tonal clipping in the histogram. The +10 moves the bulk of the curve back toward the middle a bit.
D.
Daniel_R's Flickr gallery
I shoot with Nikon stuff.
User avatar
daniel_r
Senior Member
 
Posts: 749
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2005 1:58 pm
Location: Canberra, ACT.

Postby Alpha_7 on Mon May 08, 2006 11:28 pm

daniel_r wrote:It's good, particularly so given the exposure time (your model must have held very still).

The only thing I can fault in your exposure / processing is that it's a bit muddy - as in no real white definition to balance the image out. From a quick play around, I tried adding a brightness/contrast bump of +10 on the brightness. Seemed to clean it up a bit and brought back some of the lighter tones.


She was actually posing for someone else, and I was snapping at a further distance over their shoulder. I'll try playing with the brightness (but I'm on my laptop so its super hard to judge the brightness, but I agree on the muddiness).

Here is the shot straight from raw.
Image
User avatar
Alpha_7
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7259
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 6:19 pm
Location: Mortdale - Sydney - Nikon D700, x-D200, Leica, G9

Postby Steffen on Tue May 09, 2006 2:03 am

Wow, 1+ second, seriously? I'm not sure I could hold still with this kind of facial expression for one second.

Cheers
Steffen.
User avatar
Steffen
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1931
Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2005 4:52 pm
Location: Toongabbie, NSW

Postby wendellt on Tue May 09, 2006 10:33 am

it's not a shitty shot it just looks candid
sometimes that sort of blur and noise can give an image a nice feel

subject matter is good of D-mo famous sydney fashion photographer

your b+w treatment is probably as far as you can go to recover it
User avatar
wendellt
Outstanding Member of the year (Don't try this at home.)
 
Posts: 4078
Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2005 10:04 am
Location: Dilettante Outside the City Walls, Sydney

Postby Alpha_7 on Tue May 09, 2006 10:39 am

Steffen wrote:Wow, 1+ second, seriously? I'm not sure I could hold still with this kind of facial expression for one second.

Cheers
Steffen.


1/13s of a second sorry my Sony with the typo, at 125mm and 1.13 seconds I'm sure it would of been rubbish ;-)

Thanks for the feedback.
User avatar
Alpha_7
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7259
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 6:19 pm
Location: Mortdale - Sydney - Nikon D700, x-D200, Leica, G9


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques