One shot or two???

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

One shot or two???

Postby stubbsy on Sun May 14, 2006 10:39 pm

This is a problem image for me. I'd be interested in your comments. I'm tempted to slice this image in half and create two separate portraits with 2 girls in each. SO my question is: Slice in two or leave as is?

Image

and the split versions"

Image


Image
Last edited by stubbsy on Sun May 14, 2006 11:06 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything.
*** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
User avatar
stubbsy
Moderator
 
Posts: 10748
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
Location: Newcastle NSW - D700

Postby Geoff on Sun May 14, 2006 10:45 pm

Peter - firstly, this is an absolutely lovely image!
Secondly I think it'd (probably) be better if you split it in two, your idea of doing this will create a little more intimacy, and the closeness of friends.

I think it would like great either way, but possibly better split into two :).
Geoff
Special Moments Photography
Nikon D700, 50mm 1.4, 85mm 1.4, 70-200 2.8VR, SB800 & some simple studio stuff.
User avatar
Geoff
Moderator
 
Posts: 7791
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 12:08 am
Location: Freshwater - Northern Beaches, Sydney.

Postby stubbsy on Sun May 14, 2006 11:06 pm

Thanks Geoff. Just updated the post and added the split version.
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything.
*** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
User avatar
stubbsy
Moderator
 
Posts: 10748
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
Location: Newcastle NSW - D700

Postby Matt. K on Sun May 14, 2006 11:24 pm

I'd split.
Regards

Matt. K
User avatar
Matt. K
Former Outstanding Member Of The Year and KM
 
Posts: 9981
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2004 7:12 pm
Location: North Nowra

Postby pharmer on Sun May 14, 2006 11:29 pm

Great facial expressions Peter - splitting into 2 images works well
pharmer
Member
 
Posts: 476
Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2006 11:21 pm
Location: Tauranga, New Zealand

Postby daniel_r on Mon May 15, 2006 12:31 am

Split it :D

The gap in the original throws you - you don't know what to look at first.

Girl #3 (from the left) turned out from the centre of frame also doesn't help. It makes it look like she's going to run away from you!.
In the split image, it appears that she's turned in toward the centre of frame as you would more likely expect in portraiture.
D.
Daniel_R's Flickr gallery
I shoot with Nikon stuff.
User avatar
daniel_r
Senior Member
 
Posts: 749
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2005 1:58 pm
Location: Canberra, ACT.

Postby cameraguy21773 on Mon May 15, 2006 12:35 am

It is an excellent shot but begs to be split.
regards
Mike Parker
Frederick, MD

Take Only Pictures, Leave Only Footprints
User avatar
cameraguy21773
Member
 
Posts: 214
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 10:16 am
Location: Frederick, Maryland USA - D2H, D1x (2), D70

Postby losfp on Mon May 15, 2006 12:38 am

I'm going to take a different viewpoint. I prefer the original because i think it presents a more complete story. I like the four slightly different personalities in the one shot.
User avatar
losfp
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1572
Joined: Thu Nov 17, 2005 12:45 pm
Location: Quakers Hill, Sydney

Postby Alex on Mon May 15, 2006 12:54 am

I like the split version.

Alex
User avatar
Alex
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3465
Joined: Thu Feb 24, 2005 6:14 pm
Location: Melbourne - Nikon

Postby shakey on Mon May 15, 2006 1:01 am

The split is great. There are better in portrait orientation and you have two natural couples.
User avatar
shakey
Senior Member
 
Posts: 696
Joined: Sat Apr 09, 2005 9:24 pm
Location: Far South Coast NSW

Postby Fortigurn on Mon May 15, 2006 1:32 am

The split is definitely good - the original was too evenly weighted. Lovely shots, lovely expressions.
Fortigurn
Member
 
Posts: 228
Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 12:23 am
Location: Taipei (Taiwan)

Postby LostDingo on Mon May 15, 2006 7:39 am

definitely a split
User avatar
LostDingo
Senior Member
 
Posts: 951
Joined: Tue Jul 26, 2005 8:18 am
Location: Rozelle

Postby Alpha_7 on Mon May 15, 2006 8:11 am

I agree with the Split works much better then all four as the pairs seem to be a little at odds with each other / or atleast their reaction to the photo is at odds with the other pairs. Nicely taken Peter.
User avatar
Alpha_7
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7259
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 6:19 pm
Location: Mortdale - Sydney - Nikon D700, x-D200, Leica, G9

Postby huynhie on Mon May 15, 2006 8:23 am

I prefer the split as well.
User avatar
huynhie
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1476
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 12:11 pm
Location: Sydney

Postby PiroStitch on Mon May 15, 2006 11:18 am

Splits works bestest :D
Hassy, Leica, Nikon, iPhone
Come follow the rabbit hole...
User avatar
PiroStitch
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4669
Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2005 1:08 am
Location: Hong Kong

Postby suzanneg on Mon May 15, 2006 11:17 pm

Agree with the consensus. In the single photo, there are two stories happining and the eye wanders from one to the other. In the split version, there is a single, strong theme. Nice shots :D
Canon EOS 350D Tamron 18-200mm
Just what do you think you're doing Dave?
User avatar
suzanneg
Member
 
Posts: 315
Joined: Sun Mar 19, 2006 8:26 pm
Location: Epping, Sydney

Postby christiand on Mon May 15, 2006 11:50 pm

Great photo.

I have to disagree about splitting the image.
I cannot see two different stories happening unless I would want to
influence what was captured.
(the photo captures one story, why would anyone turn this into two seperate stories ?)
I also believe that the four girls belong together and
they all form part of the image.
Check their eyes and what they are looking at.

Best regards, my 20 cents,
Christian
User avatar
christiand
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1989
Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2004 1:36 pm
Location: Tuggeranong, ACT - Canberra

Postby leek on Wed May 17, 2006 12:05 am

I kept meaning to comment on this, but never got around to it due to bus(y/i)ness...

Peter, I can't help thinking that the original shot would have been improved if you had been about a foot lower when taking the shot... C'mon... get those creaky knees working for you... :lol:

Interestingly, this problem isn't as obvious in the split shots... :!:
Cheers, John
Leek@Flickr | Leek@RedBubble | Leek@DeviantArt

D700; D200; Tokina 12-24; Nikkor 50mm f1.4,18-70mm,85mm f1.8, 105mm,80-400VR, SB-800s; G1227LVL; RRS BH-55; Feisol 1401
User avatar
leek
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3135
Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 4:46 pm
Location: Lane Cove, Sydney

Postby stubbsy on Wed May 17, 2006 9:51 am

Thank you all for your input. I've set these aside without making a decision. Later in the year they are tagged for my Momento book and I'll decide then with fresh eyes and your comments.

John - re: getting lower. You are correct the shot would be better. Fortunately I did get lower for a lot of the other shots I took of the flower girls.
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything.
*** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
User avatar
stubbsy
Moderator
 
Posts: 10748
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
Location: Newcastle NSW - D700


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques