Love / Hate

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Love / Hate

Postby stubbsy on Mon May 22, 2006 10:11 pm

This is a classic fish eye shot IMHO. I'm guessing there will be polarised views on this one. No defish so the effect has been kept and an uncropped image to boot (yes I sometimes manage to frame things right in camera :shock: )

Taken while test driving my new D2x & my old 10.5 DX fisheye:

Image
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything.
*** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
User avatar
stubbsy
Moderator
 
Posts: 10748
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
Location: Newcastle NSW - D700

Postby pharmer on Mon May 22, 2006 10:34 pm

I like it - the wider the better :)

Works best on expansive scenery and indoor architecture
pharmer
Member
 
Posts: 476
Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2006 11:21 pm
Location: Tauranga, New Zealand

Postby Oneputt on Mon May 22, 2006 10:45 pm

A classic alright :D
"The good thing about meditation is that it makes doing nothing respectable"

D3 - http://www.oneputtphotographics.com
User avatar
Oneputt
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3174
Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2005 3:58 pm
Location: Stuck in traffic Maroochydore.

Postby Slider on Mon May 22, 2006 10:47 pm

Love it :D
Cheers
Mark :) http://www.photographicaustralia.com
http://www.trekaboutphotography.com

He who dies with the most lenses wins...
User avatar
Slider
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1767
Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2005 8:17 pm
Location: Pumicestone Passage, S.E. Qld

Postby sirhc55 on Mon May 22, 2006 10:54 pm

Depends on your definition of ”classic” Peter. As a fisheye, well it’s a fisheye! IMO fisheye shots need to be well thought out and different. We have a member (can’t remember his name) from Belgium who uses the fisheye to make a shot, that is different and in many ways classic.

Sorry mate, it’s just very ordinary.
Chris
--------------------------------
I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
User avatar
sirhc55
Key Member
 
Posts: 12930
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 6:57 pm
Location: Port Macquarie - Olympus EM-10

Postby cameraguy21773 on Mon May 22, 2006 10:59 pm

Nicely done! I like balance in this one although at the size you posted it's probably not nearly as dramatic as a large version would be.
regards
Mike Parker
Frederick, MD

Take Only Pictures, Leave Only Footprints
User avatar
cameraguy21773
Member
 
Posts: 214
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 10:16 am
Location: Frederick, Maryland USA - D2H, D1x (2), D70

Postby Mitchell on Mon May 22, 2006 11:00 pm

Is the eye in the title for fish-eye. or because it looks like an eye?

It might just be my job, but when I look at this image all I can see is the top of a big eye ball looking up into the sky...
User avatar
Mitchell
Member
 
Posts: 238
Joined: Tue Feb 07, 2006 3:16 am
Location: Île Saint Louis, Paris

Postby Paul on Mon May 22, 2006 11:20 pm

Nice work there Peter, it makes me feel dizzy :twisted:
Nikon F80D, FM2n
RRS BH-55, 055XPROB
Smugmug
User avatar
Paul
Senior Member
 
Posts: 866
Joined: Tue Nov 23, 2004 8:32 am
Location: Baulkham Hills, NSW, Australia

Postby Geoff on Tue May 23, 2006 12:06 am

Mitchell wrote:Is the eye in the title for fish-eye. or because it looks like an eye?

It might just be my job, but when I look at this image all I can see is the top of a big eye ball looking up into the sky...



You need a holiday Mitch :)
Geoff
Special Moments Photography
Nikon D700, 50mm 1.4, 85mm 1.4, 70-200 2.8VR, SB800 & some simple studio stuff.
User avatar
Geoff
Moderator
 
Posts: 7791
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 12:08 am
Location: Freshwater - Northern Beaches, Sydney.

Postby robw25 on Tue May 23, 2006 12:06 am

good shot stubbsy !! hanging out to get mine !!!!!!!!!!!!!

cheers rob
User avatar
robw25
Senior Member
 
Posts: 886
Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2004 10:31 pm
Location: whyalla south australia

Postby BBJ on Tue May 23, 2006 7:16 am

Ni9ce shot also stubbsy, i like the effect and well also what Chris said it oes have to be something thought out i guess but still lots of fun and well have to test out all that glass on trhe new toy.
Cheers
D3,D2x,D70,18-70 kit lens,Sigma 70-200mm F2.8EX HSM,Nikon AF-I 300m F2.8, TC20E 2X
80-400VR,SB800,Vosonic X Drive,VP6210 40
http://www.oz-images.com
User avatar
BBJ
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3651
Joined: Mon Nov 15, 2004 8:49 pm
Location: Mt Gambier South Australia-D70-D2X

Postby bindiblue on Tue May 23, 2006 9:05 am

Great shot,, I have never seen fish eye before,, I live this
.

Suzanne
Nikon D200, 24-120mm VR, 70-300 ED, SB800 flash, Manfrotto tripod,
bindiblue
Member
 
Posts: 277
Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2006 12:23 pm
Location: Caboolture Queensland

Postby big pix on Tue May 23, 2006 9:10 am

sirhc55 wrote:
Sorry mate, it’s just very ordinary.


....... I agree ........
Cheers ....bp....
Difference between a good street photographer and a great street photographer....
Removing objects that do not belong...
happy for the comments, but
.....Please DO NOT edit my image.....
http://bigpix.smugmug.com Forever changing
User avatar
big pix
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4513
Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 11:52 pm
Location: Lake Macquarie NSW.

Postby gstark on Tue May 23, 2006 10:36 am

The horizon's not straight.

:)

Seriously, Chris has said it all. This image reminds of the times in the 60s and 70s when people who have FE lenses used them to make all manner of images ... because they could .... rather than because their use was warranted by the image needing to be made.
g.
Gary Stark
Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff
The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
User avatar
gstark
Site Admin
 
Posts: 22924
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
Location: Bondi, NSW


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques