Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.
Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.
Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.
Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.
Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
by Mitchell on Mon May 22, 2006 9:02 am
I was suspicious when I saw some Nikon gear wandering around the zoo yesterday... Looks like others were there too.
Some of my other favourite shots were of the bird show - eagle, kite, snowy owl - very low flying and hard to track, a great challenge.
I particularly enjoyed the light in the reptilian area, so here are a few for C&C. Alterations include cropping and curves adjustment.
#1
#2
#3
-

Mitchell
- Member
-
- Posts: 238
- Joined: Tue Feb 07, 2006 3:16 am
- Location: Île Saint Louis, Paris
-
by Sir Tristram on Mon May 22, 2006 11:02 am
Very nice Mitchell. I was wandering around on Saturday and all my photos of the reptiles turned out rubbish. What tips have you got on getting them so clear through the glass and in such poor light? What lense did you use etc etc.
And this is where I met the leprechaun - He told me to burn things
-

Sir Tristram
- Member
-
- Posts: 154
- Joined: Mon Mar 20, 2006 4:17 pm
- Location: Dundas - NSW - D70s
-
by stubbsy on Mon May 22, 2006 11:12 am
Mitchell
3 very interesting images, of which #2 is the standout for me. Of interest too is they all show that renowned Canon nudge towards softness I'm curious about what lens you used for these shots since the bokeh in #1 is very harsh, but not so in 2 or 3. Different lens - or bad light?
-

stubbsy
- Moderator
-
- Posts: 10748
- Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
- Location: Newcastle NSW - D700
-
by sirhc55 on Mon May 22, 2006 12:31 pm
#2 is superb. #3 has beautiful composition 
Chris -------------------------------- I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
-

sirhc55
- Key Member
-
- Posts: 12930
- Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 6:57 pm
- Location: Port Macquarie - Olympus EM-10
by Mitchell on Mon May 22, 2006 5:36 pm
Thanks for the comments.
Sir Tristram: Lens used was: 24-70 2.8L, all were shot at 2.8. To reduce reflection I told my nephews to stand well back - the annoying reflections come from our side of the glass, so with an appropriate angle and no-one standing close they should not be a problem. It was also good to shoot earlier in the day - fewer sticky fingerprints!
In terms of light - big aperture helped, but I also only tried shooting animals that had nicely plopped themselves under one of the lights. Selecting relatively good lighting mean these were shot at ISO 400, 250 and 100 respectively.
Stubbsy: Same lens for all three - #1 was a bigger glass cage with more light sources and I think that is cause of the harsh bokeh. The other two only had one light source - and it happened to be in a good spot!  I've heard people mention the phenomenon of Canon softness - but it doesn't really worry me. I actually tried PP sharpening these a bit, and I preferred how it was straight out of the box. I guess another one of those personal preference things...
Chris: Cheers! 
-

Mitchell
- Member
-
- Posts: 238
- Joined: Tue Feb 07, 2006 3:16 am
- Location: Île Saint Louis, Paris
-
by avkomp on Mon May 22, 2006 5:41 pm
2 is clearly a standout for me also
well done
Steve
-

avkomp
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 2485
- Joined: Sun May 29, 2005 8:47 pm
- Location: Bendoura NSW - Nikon D5
-
by PiroStitch on Mon May 22, 2006 5:51 pm
love number 2...very hypnotic...zzzzzzz
-

PiroStitch
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 4669
- Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2005 1:08 am
- Location: Hong Kong
-
by pharmer on Mon May 22, 2006 6:05 pm
#2 is a winner - nicely framed and great colour
Is that an Emerald Python of some sort?
-
pharmer
- Member
-
- Posts: 476
- Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2006 11:21 pm
- Location: Tauranga, New Zealand
by stubbsy on Mon May 22, 2006 6:30 pm
Mitchell
Thanks for the info. My comment about Canon softness wasn't intended as an insult - more a note on the obvious point of difference. Canon gives softer images than Nikon, but both produce high quality shots with the right person behind the camera. At the end of the day I soften some shots that you would get out of the camera, while you sharpen some I'd leave alone.
Viva La Difference! 
-

stubbsy
- Moderator
-
- Posts: 10748
- Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
- Location: Newcastle NSW - D700
-
by wendellt on Mon May 22, 2006 6:33 pm
nice tone, it's good to see you recognised good light and shot it as it was
number 2 is special and that bokeh quality on htat L lens is sweet shows best in number 3
-

wendellt
- Outstanding Member of the year (Don't try this at home.)
-
- Posts: 4078
- Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2005 10:04 am
- Location: Dilettante Outside the City Walls, Sydney
-
Return to Image Reviews and Critiques
|