
this was taken in aperture priority f/5.6 at 6.26 am

c&c welcome, thanks for looking.
cheers pa
sunriseModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
8 posts
• Page 1 of 1
sunrisei took these about a month ago, the first was taken in shutter priority of 1.6 seconds aperture was f/29 at 6.02 am
![]() this was taken in aperture priority f/5.6 at 6.26 am ![]() c&c welcome, thanks for looking. cheers pa
The colours are very nice though the second shot seems a tad soft to me, Im not sure if thats due to poor focus or camera shake, but the colours are certainly nice, getting up at sunrise is always rewarding except for when its extremely cold like it has been the last few mornings here.
Are we there yet?
Nice shots. Beautiful colours.
However I'd be inclined to crop the foreground out for a pano style photo as there isn't much interest there (for me anyway) and it would look better (for me anyway) with the horizon out of the middle. Just out of interest... is there any particular reason you chose f29? You'd probably get sharper results using F16 or so at hyperfocal distance. Since there isn't a huge amount of very close foreground detail F16 would give you more than enough DOF. Paul http://www.australiandigitalphotography.com
Living in poverty due to my addiction to NIKON... Is there a clinic that can help me?
G'day Pa,
Love the soft subdued colors and tones in these, very serene settings... Sunrise and sunsets are magical times of the day, I never tire of these sorts of images ![]() One question, why F29? Or is that a typo, I couldn't get the EXIF to check... An aperture as small as this might result in softness if you use it for something with a detailed subject... Aka Andrew
Ahhh, so I assume the camera wanted to extend the shutter time from what you set it at, so it closed the aperture down... Where you after a "fast" shutter speed and that's why you used Shutter pri? Aka Andrew
Previous topic • Next topic
8 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|