
and

My, what big eyes you have!Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
10 posts
• Page 1 of 1
My, what big eyes you have!Decided to take my 28-105mm for a spin with macro mode. Still thinking I 'd like a 105mm micro, but this is it for now. Small photoshop tweak and some cropping...
![]() and ![]() - Danny
D70, CP700, F80, FM, F, 50/1.8, 28-105,.... "Nothing in the affairs of men is worthy of great anxiety." -Plato
Nice captures. Yes, you do indeed need the Micro Nikkor 105mm.
Have a look at some of the pics I took with the Nikkor 105mm of the jumping spider. Remember, these are resized versions. The spider is quite big in the original image captured. http://www.kamranki.com:1030/images/photography/insects_arachnids/insects_arachnids.html Nikon D200 | Nikkor AF-S 18-70mm DX | Sigma 15-30mm EX DG | Nikkor AF Micro 105mm 2.8 D | Nikkor AF 50mm 1.8D | Nikon Speedlight SB-800
Yeah, this little guy was maybe 6mm? But I had to get really close and he kept moving to the other side of the bolt and needed a little encouragement to get back on top. Otherwise he/she was a great model! ![]() - Danny
D70, CP700, F80, FM, F, 50/1.8, 28-105,.... "Nothing in the affairs of men is worthy of great anxiety." -Plato
Yeah, I thought that. It was all pretty quick and handheld, one eye on the spider and the other watching my 3yo. ![]() I haven't done the research yet, but I'm guessing a dedicated macro would help get a better DOF when I want to? - Danny
D70, CP700, F80, FM, F, 50/1.8, 28-105,.... "Nothing in the affairs of men is worthy of great anxiety." -Plato
I reckon if that first one was razor sharp around the spider, it'd be a winner!
I know how hard they are to follow, ive tried hunting them with my 90mm tamron macro and it can get difficult!! This was a 4mm model that I had to get on a stick to keep still.. I had the lens prefocused and moved back and forwards slowly till i got within range and fired the shutter... and i was shooting with one hand.. this image was just resized.. no cropping ![]() Keep it up Dan look forward to seeing more of your macros.. Tim D70 - D200/MBD200 Coming soon - Too Much Gear, Not Enough Talent
My Site: http://www.digitalstill.net My Fishing Site: http://www.fishseq.com
You can see some of my jumping spider shots in this post here http://www.dslrusers.net/viewtopic.php? ... highlight=
I consider these spiders cute as far as spiders go. ![]() They were taken with the Sigma 105.
Thanks guys.
Yep, there's a 105mm micro on my shopping list me thinks. Does the different focal length in the lens (i.e. 60/105/180mm) pretty much just effect how close you have to get? Or are there other effects... - Danny
D70, CP700, F80, FM, F, 50/1.8, 28-105,.... "Nothing in the affairs of men is worthy of great anxiety." -Plato
Previous topic • Next topic
10 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|