


Melbourne at nightModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
7 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Melbourne at nightJust a few pictures i took last night, thought id share and hopefully get some pointers on....
![]() ![]() ![]() Jamie
D70s - Nikkor 18-70mm f/3.5-4.5G ED - Nikkor 50mm f/1.8D AF - Nikkor 70-300mm f/4-5.6G AF - Nikon SB600
Nice ones Jamie.
#1 produces a strange optical effect as you scroll it up and down. Almost like the tower is enlarging and shrinking in width rather than scrolling. Looks really good. As Alex says, #1 is not completely verticle. If it was, it might accentuate the optical illusion even more. Cheers John D3, D300, 14-24/2.8, 24-70/2.8, 85/1.4, 80-400VR, 18-200VR, 105/2.8 VR macro, Sigma 150/2.8 macro
http://www.johndarguephotography.com/
Some interesting images there. I like the chairs in #3, but I'm not sure about the fuzziness too it. Was it camera movement?
Nikon D70s, Nikkor 18-70, Sigma 70-300DG APO
http://www.flickr.com/photos/jonasphoto/
Thanks for the comments everyone.
![]() I swore the first image was straight, maybe i was leaning in the chair at the time of processing it. Never mind, thats an easy fix, but thanks for pointing that out. I thought that the second image might come across a little dark to some people, although i like dark images myself i thought it worth putting to the people on here for their thoughts. The colour version is quite nice also but it just screamed B&W to me. The third image is blurry (no doubt camera movment), i was using the SB600 off the camera while holding it out and up with my left hand so only one hand on the camera in bad lighting conditions. I thought there was something strange about that picture but never picked it as camera movment, i thought it was something to do with the flash reflection off the highly polished wooden chairs. Jamie
D70s - Nikkor 18-70mm f/3.5-4.5G ED - Nikkor 50mm f/1.8D AF - Nikkor 70-300mm f/4-5.6G AF - Nikon SB600
Previous topic • Next topic
7 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|