
WaitingModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
33 posts
• Page 1 of 1
WaitingI'm still post-processing images from my Uni's protest (and I've been doing it all of this late, late night) but here's one I spent a fair amount of time on:
![]() Producer & Editor @ GadgetGuy.com.au
Contributor for fine magazines such as PC Authority and Popular Science.
absolute cracker of a shot... nicely done!
what's the story behind the image? Very intense thought on her face... cheers http://www.markcrossphotography.com - A camera, glass, and some light.
What xerubus said.
g.
Gary Stark Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
Excellent shot, Leigh. Great shadow detail and well PP'd. Can't wait to see more.
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything. *** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
great image.
like the shadows and overall feel of this shot. Steve check out my image gallery @
http://photography.avkomp.com/gallery3
The girl was one of the protesters standing on a plinthe wearing gold paint, a bra, and undies and that's it. There were others wearing the same or a tad less, but she was standing with a model pose of just looking up at the sky. I knew when I saw it that it would make a good black and white, I just didn't realise it would take me half an hour to make it that nice (James took me the same amount of time, mind you).
Producer & Editor @ GadgetGuy.com.au
Contributor for fine magazines such as PC Authority and Popular Science.
This was Wednesday around 1.30 I think outside of Parliament in the CBD, so it was probably partly cloudy.
The settings in post-processing have been driving me nuts because since there are so many pictures and sky kept on shifting from sunny to overcast, I've been having to shift my temperature so many times for the colour photos. Producer & Editor @ GadgetGuy.com.au
Contributor for fine magazines such as PC Authority and Popular Science.
Two reasons: 1. You always want to start with the best image you possibly can even if you're going to post-process to a different style of image, say a sepia or a black & white image. Fixing the colour is going to be important for the type of black & white you apply, also. 2. I may not export the image to black & white in the end. I do a lot of work in the monochromatic range because I'm not particularly fond of colour photography, but some images just don't need a reason to go to monochrome so I may as well have a good colour version at the RAW level. Producer & Editor @ GadgetGuy.com.au
Contributor for fine magazines such as PC Authority and Popular Science.
Great image, Leigh. Who would have believed that it was a candid shot if they did not know the story behind it. Excellent pping too.
Alex
This is the original in case anyone is interested:
![]() Producer & Editor @ GadgetGuy.com.au
Contributor for fine magazines such as PC Authority and Popular Science.
Thats a vast difference from the original to the PPed shot, and probably quite complex but could you give us a brief rundown on what PP was done to aceive the final image?
Cheers Rod
hi
as much as i like the overall shot and the conversion, i find strange that you did not clone the white bit on the right. i think you could have reduce the opacity of it and bring just a bit more the all background. i really like you conversion to b/w, great job. thanks for sharing christian check my website>> http://www.6701.sunpixs.com
I don't think it was really on the radar to begin with.
That said, I haven't sent it to any papers at all. Might do that this week. Producer & Editor @ GadgetGuy.com.au
Contributor for fine magazines such as PC Authority and Popular Science.
Wow, what a fantastic image Leigh. Can I add to the chorus of people asking how you achieve you b/w conversions? They're light years ahead of what I can manage.
Perhaps another tutorial in the PP section? Andrew
Well, I'm a virtualPhotographer user, but I've worked on a whole bunch of my own presets over time, and this was done with layering and using curves adjustments over around 2-3 layers.
So I asked Dad what I should do and if I should give out my presets and apparently now I'm to do a tutorial on how to make good black & white virtualPhotographer presets for yourself and then how to layer them to get a good result. So this'll be a PC only tut with a free plugin being used. And yes, I can do this without the plugin or go into the other colour modes, but I find using a plugin with my own settings is a quicker way of getting to black and white, considering that you still have to do a fair bit of work on top of the plugin pass. Producer & Editor @ GadgetGuy.com.au
Contributor for fine magazines such as PC Authority and Popular Science.
did you just hard mask the background and turn it black
in the original file there are a few features in the backgrund that are quite noticable in your final image the background seems knocked out, didyou acheive this by your custom settings or did you just fill the background with black?
Oh no, I pretty much use custom settings now.
I've made about 30 or 40 of them and I have different uses. This one used about 2 or 3 of the settings with layer blends. Producer & Editor @ GadgetGuy.com.au
Contributor for fine magazines such as PC Authority and Popular Science.
still don'tget how a custom setting can mask ou rtparticular bits of the background
the white balcony feature on the top left has high highlights you must of masked out the girl to reduce that highlight to utter black otherwise similar highlights on the girl would of been lost
It actually feels a little bit on the overdone to me. Like the guy who has eaten too much salt, and slowly keeps adding it and can't tell the difference until finally he's destroyed the entire dish.
I like the original though, the worked over version needs a softer touch on the woman.
I tend to agree with Dave that the PP seems a little overdone for my tastes, I like the affect on her face but not on her body.
Well, I'm happy with it.
![]() Producer & Editor @ GadgetGuy.com.au
Contributor for fine magazines such as PC Authority and Popular Science.
Top shot Leigh. Some extensive work PPing but I think you've created a very interesting and powerful image. Very nice
![]() Cheers
Mark ![]() http://www.trekaboutphotography.com He who dies with the most lenses wins...
Leigh good shit!. B/W seems your go now. Do you need to save your presets? You seem to have a reasonable grasp on Pshop. Have go without the saved stuff and open up. I reckon you can come up with some even more outstanding PPing. I quite like how you blow the highlites.
Jethro shoot it real.
look! and see. Shoot and feel
Previous topic • Next topic
33 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|