S3, 85mm, f2.4, ISO800, 1/90s

D200, ZF-50mm, f1.4, ISO800

bokehModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
12 posts
• Page 1 of 1
I really like the first one the only negative for me is the white string like object at the bottom but it's only a minor niggle.
Yeah, that is a wire for the priests microphone. An odd place to put it, but i couldn't move it. Andrew
Canon make photocopiers and stick lenses on them....
Couldn't move it on the day, but with a little PP you can removed it ![]()
Sorry, I find the first one a strain as I am trying to get the couple in the background into focus. Maybe if they were more blurred more it might work better? The candle and desk is very nicely in focus.
D50 - AF-S NIKKOR 18-70mm 3.5-4.5G ED
Andrew
I like the execution and concept of #1, but find the image itself a little odd. Have you applied some sort of vignette blur to the image? In the lower left corner there seems to be a quite sudden drop off in sharpness where the cord disapperas out of sight. Not what I'd usually expect to see with the DOF here. Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything. *** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
To me that looks more like a forground object getting in the shot.
I really like them both Padey. At ISO 800 I guess you're not using flash.
Is that the way you normally work? I'm doing my nieces wedding in October, so am keen to see different types of shots and to understand how they're done. Cheers John D3, D300, 14-24/2.8, 24-70/2.8, 85/1.4, 80-400VR, 18-200VR, 105/2.8 VR macro, Sigma 150/2.8 macro
http://www.johndarguephotography.com/
Previous topic • Next topic
12 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|