New scanner, printer, copier

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

New scanner, printer, copier

Postby suzanneg on Sat Jun 03, 2006 2:31 pm

I have a new toy. My husband bought me an epson Photo RX650 which not only prints photos beautifully, but also scans directly from photos, slides or negatives. I picked out two photos to scan from old holidays to see how it goes. Both photos taken with my old Pentax SLR with a Pentax 35-105mm lens. Can't tell you the exif (too long ago).

The first is one of the Eiffel Tower in Paris.
Image

The second is one of Russell Falls in Tasmania. I have a poster size of this photo framed on the wall in my lounge room. I still seem to spend plenty of time staring into it. Especially during that first morning cup of coffee. My favourite part of this photo are the shadows in the bottom left that kinda look like a star wars character is standing in the water. Do you see it?
Image

Anyway, happy with the scanning quality. What do you think?
Canon EOS 350D Tamron 18-200mm
Just what do you think you're doing Dave?
User avatar
suzanneg
Member
 
Posts: 315
Joined: Sun Mar 19, 2006 8:26 pm
Location: Epping, Sydney

Postby NJ on Sat Jun 03, 2006 2:44 pm

they're excellent! the quality is great, i couldnt tell that they are scanned photos. i love that second shot, but im not very familiar with star wars, so i cant see the character :lol:
Nathan
D700 | MB-D10 | Nikkor 14-24 | Nikkor 24-70 | Sigma 70-200 | 20 2.8 28 2.8 35 2 50 1.8 | Sigma 105 | SB-800
http://www.flickr.com/nathanjphoto/
User avatar
NJ
Senior Member
 
Posts: 712
Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2005 12:00 am
Location: Ringwood, Melbourne

Postby Ivanerrol on Sat Jun 03, 2006 7:29 pm

Did you scan from the photo print or the negative?
Just shows to go you that the old Pentax was excellent all those years ago.
Now you are into the scanning bug, how many thousands of old photos/slides/negatives have you got to scan?
User avatar
Ivanerrol
Member
 
Posts: 286
Joined: Wed Aug 31, 2005 1:40 pm
Location: Ivanhoe Melbourne Australia

Postby Justin on Sat Jun 03, 2006 8:47 pm

It's Darth Vader meets Wicked Witch of the West.... I'm melting, I'm meeeeeeeeeeeeltingggggggggggg....!!!!!!!!!!!!!
D3 | 18-200VR | 50:1.4 | 28:2.8 | 35-70 2.8 | 12-24 f4
picasaweb.google.com/JustinPhotoGallery
"We don't know and we don't care"
User avatar
Justin
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1089
Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2005 9:32 pm
Location: Newtown, Sydeny

Postby suzanneg on Sat Jun 03, 2006 9:17 pm

Ivanerrol wrote:Did you scan from the photo print or the negative?
Just shows to go you that the old Pentax was excellent all those years ago.
Now you are into the scanning bug, how many thousands of old photos/slides/negatives have you got to scan?


These two were scanned from photos. I'll have a go at negatives next.
Oh no :shock: I have boxes - that's of the photos. Then I have hundreds of slides as well. If I was going to scan them all, then I'd never take another photo.
Canon EOS 350D Tamron 18-200mm
Just what do you think you're doing Dave?
User avatar
suzanneg
Member
 
Posts: 315
Joined: Sun Mar 19, 2006 8:26 pm
Location: Epping, Sydney

Postby blacknstormy on Sat Jun 03, 2006 10:14 pm

Suzanne - fantastic scans !!!!

And I can see the character - the one I'm thinking of was in the original star wars movie, and was in the bar when the weird band were playing and obi-1-konobi, Luke and I think it was Harrison Fords character walked in.....

did that make sense??????

Use the force guys, use the force ;)

Rel
Dodging and burning are steps to take care of mistakes God made in establishing tonal relationships! -Ansel Adams

http://www.redbubble.com/people/blacknstormy
User avatar
blacknstormy
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2745
Joined: Wed Dec 29, 2004 3:33 pm
Location: Ipswich Qld

Postby Ivanerrol on Sat Jun 03, 2006 11:25 pm

Scan the negatives and slides - if you still have them - A whole new world opens for you.
:D
I've been told by a wholesaler of Epsom scanners that the dedicated transperancy and negative film scanner manufacturers such as KM and Nikon have given up production of these dedicated units now that Epson have got so good at overall flatbed scanning technique.
Epson V700 or V750 on the shopping list.
User avatar
Ivanerrol
Member
 
Posts: 286
Joined: Wed Aug 31, 2005 1:40 pm
Location: Ivanhoe Melbourne Australia

Postby rooboy on Tue Jun 06, 2006 12:07 am

I haven't ever seen that first shot before - simply a fantastic shot, the DOF is amazing as the entire image seems sharp :). Excellent framing too.

I know that the 2nd shot works from the enormous print on the wall - a testament to the resolution of film over digital.
So join in the chorus, and sing it one and all!
User avatar
rooboy
Member
 
Posts: 479
Joined: Wed Nov 02, 2005 9:14 am
Location: Maroubra, Sydney


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques