Looking up at things

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Looking up at things

Postby rooboy on Sun Jun 18, 2006 6:01 pm

...literally :)

2 experiments from yesterday, please be brutally honest and tell me if either work.

I've done a quick B&W on each (not really happy with the trees yet), if anyone would like to have a play please do so.

Image

Image

Image

Image
So join in the chorus, and sing it one and all!
User avatar
rooboy
Member
 
Posts: 479
Joined: Wed Nov 02, 2005 9:14 am
Location: Maroubra, Sydney

Postby wendellt on Sun Jun 18, 2006 6:05 pm

i like the idea of the 3rd
execution in black and white is more surreal and appealing on that level
cool stuff
User avatar
wendellt
Outstanding Member of the year (Don't try this at home.)
 
Posts: 4078
Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2005 10:04 am
Location: Dilettante Outside the City Walls, Sydney

Postby Alpha_7 on Sun Jun 18, 2006 7:34 pm

For me the trees don't really work but I like the buildings and the b&w makes for a more dramatic presentation.
User avatar
Alpha_7
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7259
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 6:19 pm
Location: Mortdale - Sydney - Nikon D700, x-D200, Leica, G9

Postby NJ on Sun Jun 18, 2006 7:34 pm

3rd shot is very trippy, makes me dizzy :)
very well taken.
Nathan
D700 | MB-D10 | Nikkor 14-24 | Nikkor 24-70 | Sigma 70-200 | 20 2.8 28 2.8 35 2 50 1.8 | Sigma 105 | SB-800
http://www.flickr.com/nathanjphoto/
User avatar
NJ
Senior Member
 
Posts: 712
Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2005 12:00 am
Location: Ringwood, Melbourne

Postby Link on Sun Jun 18, 2006 8:02 pm

It doesn't really work for me, but I find the 4th shot interesting. The buildings provides graphic lines leading one's eye to the image's centre - but the tree there makes the composition a bit confused IMHO.

Link.
User avatar
Link
Member
 
Posts: 296
Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2005 6:07 pm
Location: Nowra

Postby suzanneg on Sun Jun 18, 2006 10:20 pm

I like the buildings in both colour and black and white. You have to spend time trying to work out which way it goes, which makes it kinda cool for me. The first one doesn't really work for me.
Canon EOS 350D Tamron 18-200mm
Just what do you think you're doing Dave?
User avatar
suzanneg
Member
 
Posts: 315
Joined: Sun Mar 19, 2006 8:26 pm
Location: Epping, Sydney

Postby ghost on Sun Jun 18, 2006 10:58 pm

Nice shots. I prefer #3.
IMHO #4, the B&W of #3 could be good but the highlights and quarter tones are far too blown out.
ghost
Banned due to dishonesty and disrespect
User avatar
ghost
Banned
 
Posts: 114
Joined: Fri Oct 14, 2005 9:03 am
Location: Banned due to dishonesty and disrespect

Postby Steffen on Sun Jun 18, 2006 11:23 pm

I prefer the colour versions of both shots, the colours are simple and powerful and add to the images.

The building shot is my favourite. I think you should re-shoot it and try for more symmetry. I guess it would suit this geometric subject well.

Cheers
Steffen.
lust for comfort suffocates the soul
User avatar
Steffen
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1931
Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2005 4:52 pm
Location: Toongabbie, NSW


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques