Would a Filter Help?

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Would a Filter Help?

Postby Andyt on Thu Jun 22, 2006 12:37 am

This pic was taken at late sunset, and as you can see I have "blown" the sky.

Could this pic be improved with the use of a filter? if so what type?

The colours are very accurate as to what was, the tops of the "hills" are that bright at sunset with the rest of the scene in shadow.

D2x, Tokina 12-24

Image

Image
User avatar
Andyt
Member
 
Posts: 324
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 11:17 pm
Location: Port Hedland North Western Australia

Postby Yi-P on Thu Jun 22, 2006 1:06 am

If they were taken on a tripod, why not bracket the sky and scenery then combine in PP? Way cheaper than a grad-ND to buy IMO
User avatar
Yi-P
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3579
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 1:12 am
Location: Sydney -- Ashfield

Postby Steffen on Thu Jun 22, 2006 2:41 am

To be honest, I don't mind the blown sky, esp in the first picture. It is very uniform, and gives the image a bit of an aquarelle look.

Cheers
Steffen.
lust for comfort suffocates the soul
User avatar
Steffen
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1931
Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2005 4:52 pm
Location: Toongabbie, NSW

Postby birddog114 on Thu Jun 22, 2006 7:53 am

AndyT,
Yes, filter add on is also a help and save time to process them.

CPL and ND filters.
Birddog114
VNAF, My Beloved Country and Airspace
User avatar
birddog114
Senior Member
 
Posts: 15881
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 8:18 pm
Location: Belmore,Sydney

Postby Andyt on Thu Jun 22, 2006 10:13 am

Thanks for your response, yes Birdy, I will start exploring the world of filters.

The light up here is so strong at times, it seems only worth taking pics at sunrise & sunset outdoors!
User avatar
Andyt
Member
 
Posts: 324
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 11:17 pm
Location: Port Hedland North Western Australia

Postby birddog114 on Thu Jun 22, 2006 10:57 am

AndyT,
With filters, you can control the shooting & lighting more than without them.
Birddog114
VNAF, My Beloved Country and Airspace
User avatar
birddog114
Senior Member
 
Posts: 15881
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 8:18 pm
Location: Belmore,Sydney

Postby admajic on Thu Jun 22, 2006 11:02 am

With the first shot, if your are worried about the sky, why not crop closer to the tops of the mountains? Also I agree take another shot with the sky and PP
D50 - AF-S NIKKOR 18-70mm 3.5-4.5G ED
User avatar
admajic
Member
 
Posts: 488
Joined: Sun May 21, 2006 3:55 pm
Location: Sydney - Bondi Junction

Postby gstark on Thu Jun 22, 2006 11:06 am

Andy,

As thanh has suggested, either a CPL or a graduated ND filter could have helped to darken the sky.

Whether that equates to improving the image is a different question altogether. :)
g.
Gary Stark
Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff
The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
User avatar
gstark
Site Admin
 
Posts: 22924
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
Location: Bondi, NSW

Postby MHD on Thu Jun 22, 2006 12:03 pm

I would say you would be better off with a grad ND filter as a CP will kill the nice reflections you have on the water...
New page
http://www.potofgrass.com
Portfolio...
http://images.potofgrass.com
Comments and money always welcome
User avatar
MHD
Moderator
 
Posts: 5829
Joined: Sat Sep 11, 2004 8:51 pm
Location: Chicago Burbs

Post Processing

Postby vicpug on Fri Jun 23, 2006 11:32 am

Its always nice to have all the correct filters in your kitbag but it is not always possible or convenient. I have done a little simple postprocessing on Andy's shots (contrast mask, sharpening etc.) - maybe they are more 'art' than photography but as a last resort they just may be a saviour.

There is a little CA on the rock edge which I have not removed (yet).
Image

Image
User avatar
vicpug
Newbie
 
Posts: 9
Joined: Tue Mar 28, 2006 10:03 am
Location: Ivanhoe, Melbourne

Postby Andyt on Fri Jun 23, 2006 9:20 pm

vicpug,

Thanks for the "makeover", it has opened the top one up?... liked it more each time I looked at it :D

Not so sure about the bottom one, after I get some ND filters will try again when in that area :) ......... still miss the blue sky :(
User avatar
Andyt
Member
 
Posts: 324
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 11:17 pm
Location: Port Hedland North Western Australia

Postby glamy on Fri Jun 23, 2006 9:30 pm

A graduated ND filter would help, even though the sky is not in a straight line. I learnt that at my expense the other day. I had the filters in my bag but was too lazy to get them out :oops: . Today I bought a graduated ND 4 on top of the ND2 I already had. I'll give it a go tomorrow...
Enjoying your new camera?
Gerard
User avatar
glamy
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1112
Joined: Wed Dec 29, 2004 8:38 pm
Location: S/W Sydney- D70+D2X

Postby Andyt on Fri Jun 23, 2006 9:44 pm

Enjoying your new camera?

Hi! Glamy,

Yes, Very Much! I think it is teaching me, rather than me learning how to use it! :lol:

Tomorrow will be the first big test, we are having the Black Rock Stakes, a wheel barrow race from Whim Creek to Port Hedland, 120 K's. Relay teams push a custom w/barrow with 12Kg's iron ore in it. On average, about 7.5 to 8.5 hours to get here. I intend to catch the start and finish & "leap frog" along the way taking pics.

So, will have a wide variety of scenes and conditions to try out the new camera and to test me! :P

Will post pics asap......... Enjoying your's :?:
User avatar
Andyt
Member
 
Posts: 324
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 11:17 pm
Location: Port Hedland North Western Australia

Postby phillipb on Fri Jun 23, 2006 10:30 pm

Hi Andyt
I thought I'd have a go at PP your first photo, I used a gradient fill on the sky and the reflection on the water to make it look a bit more natural.
Still can't beat the real thing though.

Image
__________
Phillip


**Nikon D7000**
User avatar
phillipb
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2599
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 10:56 am
Location: Milperra (Sydney) **Nikon D7000**

Postby MattC on Fri Jun 23, 2006 10:49 pm

Graduated ND? I use them with film, but not with digital. The Grad ND does not always fit the scene particularly well. I would normally bracket the shot (I almost always have a tripod available).

The following techniques I might use in a pinch.

There is a really easy fix in Nik ColorEfex. One of the plugins allows the creation of a gradient between two predifined colours (there are a couple of choices) that is adjustable in direction and length. Apply it to a a new layer and use a brush in a mask to remove unwanted areas.

Doing it without the Nik plugin is equally easy. The following technique is the one that I would use when I have to.

Create a new layer
Select the gradient tool, then choose the two colours for the gradient - quick and dirty to play with is to select a darkish blue and an aquaish colour. The other choice (for better accuracy) is to sample some colours from other images. Sorry, I cannot provide more specific numbers. My laptop is not set up with Colorefex and I do not have the samples on it - my PP computers are a thousand kilometers away.

Next drag the gradient tool at the desired angle and depth. Quick note: The sky's gradient is not often top to bottom in real life.

Create a layer mask and go to work masking out the areas that you do not want affected.

Layer opacity, saturation... are useful tools for fine tuning the effect.

In the first shot the tops of the hills could possibly do with a little toning down - Another layer (reduced exposure) and a bit more masking.... or Digital ND Filter to tidy up those affected areas as covered in another thread in the last couple of days.

Cheers
MattC
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1061
Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2004 6:59 pm
Location: Pilbara WA

Postby Andyt on Fri Jun 23, 2006 11:25 pm

Phillipb,

Great! THAT is the effect I wanted to achieve :D The pic appears more "balanced" now. My memory of the scene is how you have PP the pic.
The tops of the hills, although appeared to be over exposed, are as shown.
I will practice using the gradient fill.

MattC,

I am very gratefull for your comments and advice, I should have PS CS here next week, (upgrading from PS7) and will try your advice.

The country around here at times appears extreme in light, colour, saturation etc, (Which from your location I am sure you have similar scenery) A tripod is my next upgrade, as my manfrotto 190 series legs gets the "wobbles" with the D2x mounted. Otherwise I would have waited for the light to fade a bit and taken a much slower pic. I am not keen on the use of filters here because of the dusty conditions and also from past use find I have to have cleaning gear at hand 'cause I always seem to touch the glass leaving a smudge :cry:

So, am looking forward to PS CS, and will practice your "technique" :P

Many Thanks to all for your comments & advice!
User avatar
Andyt
Member
 
Posts: 324
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 11:17 pm
Location: Port Hedland North Western Australia

Postby MattC on Fri Jun 23, 2006 11:59 pm

Andyt wrote:.... I should have PS CS here next week, (upgrading from PS7) and will try your advice.

The country around here at times appears extreme in light, colour, saturation etc, (Which from your location I am sure you have similar scenery) ....
 PS7 won't do it? It has been so long since I have used it.

That scenery looks a lot like the NT. A lot more water though. Sometimes it seems that as soon as the sun pokes its head over the horizon that I am exceeding the DR of the camera.

What I described is basically what Phillip did... I was typing away as he posted :)

Cheers :)
MattC
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1061
Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2004 6:59 pm
Location: Pilbara WA


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques