Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.
Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.
Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.
Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.
Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
by avkomp on Sat Jun 24, 2006 7:15 pm
my first time seeing an osprey so I was happy to get some usable shots out of it.
Mostly the things were too far away (or 400mm wasnt enough lens whichever way you wish to look at it.)
This was my favourite shot from the day because of the juxtaposition of a life and death struggle going on (between the fish and the bird, and the people behind walking dogs, blissfully unaware of what is going on right next to them.
light wasnt the best.
Does this work or do you prefer the type with no urban stuff in the frame??
Steve
-

avkomp
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 2485
- Joined: Sun May 29, 2005 8:47 pm
- Location: Bendoura NSW - Nikon D5
-
by avkomp on Sat Jun 24, 2006 8:18 pm
edit: left out lens etc info
d2x, 80-400mm @ 400mm, full wimberley, better beamer @ -2ev
Steve
-

avkomp
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 2485
- Joined: Sun May 29, 2005 8:47 pm
- Location: Bendoura NSW - Nikon D5
-
by fozzie on Sat Jun 24, 2006 8:22 pm
Steve - found it. Pity about the background. At least you had a better day than me, as my photography equipment did not leave home
I think that you need to train the osprey to do a fly by when you are in position with your D2x, G-1325, Gimbal Head, longest lens and blue sky as background. Have you bought a X-Lottery Ticket for tonight's draw so you can purchase of the Nikkor 600mm f/4 
fozzie
When people ask what equipment I use - I tell them my eyes.
-

fozzie
- Key Member
-
- Posts: 2806
- Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 9:19 pm
- Location: AUADA : Nikon D3/D2x - JPG Shooter
by avkomp on Sat Jun 24, 2006 8:27 pm
fozzie: did you see the post I made a few weeks ago??
had the use of a 600f4 for the weekend.
manual focus though. what a weapon 10kg worth easy.
what a weapon
As for training the birds, I think if you sat there and put the time in, you may well get a closer fishing shot. I lost one shot when I moved the af area off centre and got a perect shot of some water with an OOF bird dead centre.
I didnt mind this despite the background because it shows nobody giving a damn about the birds.
Steve
-

avkomp
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 2485
- Joined: Sun May 29, 2005 8:47 pm
- Location: Bendoura NSW - Nikon D5
-
by fozzie on Sat Jun 24, 2006 8:41 pm
Steve - yes I did, what an experience
Photography can be very frustrating at times. Change a setting or angle and miss the shot. Hopefully next time out you can get the shot you wanted.
avkomp wrote:fozzie: did you see the post I made a few weeks ago??
had the use of a 600f4 for the weekend. manual focus though. what a weapon 10kg worth easy. what a weapon
As for training the birds, I think if you sat there and put the time in, you may well get a closer fishing shot. I lost one shot when I moved the af area off centre and got a perect shot of some water with an OOF bird dead centre.
I didnt mind this despite the background because it shows nobody giving a damn about the birds.
Steve
fozzie
When people ask what equipment I use - I tell them my eyes.
-

fozzie
- Key Member
-
- Posts: 2806
- Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 9:19 pm
- Location: AUADA : Nikon D3/D2x - JPG Shooter
by admajic on Sat Jun 24, 2006 8:52 pm
Due to the sharpness of the bird it looks like u plonked it right there on that background. Maybe try putting it on anothe background, as you thought.
D50 - AF-S NIKKOR 18-70mm 3.5-4.5G ED
-

admajic
- Member
-
- Posts: 488
- Joined: Sun May 21, 2006 3:55 pm
- Location: Sydney - Bondi Junction
by avkomp on Sat Jun 24, 2006 8:55 pm
admagic,
this wasnt plonked into this background,
what happened was that this guy grabbed the fish from the water and was flying more or less straight at me.
focus was locked on the bird, but the bridge wasnt that far behind the action so as to be that OOF
Steve
-

avkomp
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 2485
- Joined: Sun May 29, 2005 8:47 pm
- Location: Bendoura NSW - Nikon D5
-
by admajic on Sat Jun 24, 2006 8:59 pm
I know it wasnt plonked there.  Just looks like it.
D50 - AF-S NIKKOR 18-70mm 3.5-4.5G ED
-

admajic
- Member
-
- Posts: 488
- Joined: Sun May 21, 2006 3:55 pm
- Location: Sydney - Bondi Junction
by Ordinary K on Sat Jun 24, 2006 9:19 pm
Great catch - both yours and the bird's.
I've done just enough bird chasing to have some idea how pleased you must be with this shot.
FWIW I prefer the cropped version (without the people) in your gallery as a picture, but you're right, this one tells more of a story.
Well done.
-
Ordinary K
- Newbie
-
- Posts: 46
- Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2005 8:06 pm
- Location: South Hobart
-
by Sir Tristram on Sat Jun 24, 2006 11:17 pm
Damm sharp Steve, who said you need a 300mm f2.8??? Keep using the 80-400 .
And this is where I met the leprechaun - He told me to burn things
-

Sir Tristram
- Member
-
- Posts: 154
- Joined: Mon Mar 20, 2006 4:17 pm
- Location: Dundas - NSW - D70s
-
by avkomp on Sun Jun 25, 2006 12:47 am
gotta get me a faster AF lens.
your 300 f2.8 with tc17 absolutely eats my 80-400vr in terms of focus speed and reacquisition time.
sTeve
-

avkomp
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 2485
- Joined: Sun May 29, 2005 8:47 pm
- Location: Bendoura NSW - Nikon D5
-
by Oneputt on Sun Jun 25, 2006 3:29 pm
Pretty good steve considering the distance. Now what we need is an 80-400VR at 2.8 or better 
-

Oneputt
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 3174
- Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2005 3:58 pm
- Location: Stuck in traffic Maroochydore.
-
by avkomp on Sun Jun 25, 2006 5:22 pm
oneput: with IF and sw technology.
Tried a 300 f2.8 with 1.7tc on it and the AF speed is frightening in comparison to the 80-400vr. as is re acquisition.
Steve
-

avkomp
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 2485
- Joined: Sun May 29, 2005 8:47 pm
- Location: Bendoura NSW - Nikon D5
-
Return to Image Reviews and Critiques
|