So, here they are, results from a cheap man's macro.



This one looks like an underwater macro...


Thanks for looking
C&C Welcome
Macros from WatsonsModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
7 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Macros from WatsonsOk, many people asked me if I had the reversing ring placed on my 50mm (cuz I had it on just to ease up changing from normal to macro) that day...
So, here they are, results from a cheap man's macro. ![]() ![]() ![]() This one looks like an underwater macro... ![]() ![]() Thanks for looking C&C Welcome
Wow - a different interpretation from our meet, unique!! These are stunning Yi-p. I can't choose a favourite, but you are right, the last one sure looks like an underwater plant etc. Nicely done!
Geoff
Special Moments Photography Nikon D700, 50mm 1.4, 85mm 1.4, 70-200 2.8VR, SB800 & some simple studio stuff.
I'd love to learn some of these techniques! Nice work.
For my own knowledge, is a reversing ring an alternative to a macro lens? So I could buy a 60mm micro for $600, or a reversing ring for $? Can I get a reversing ring for a current 50/1.8? part number or manufacturer, and cost? I assume there are cons, such as manual focus by moving? metering? etc? THanks heaps
Thanks Geoff
![]()
That is the Nikon BR2A reversal ring. Made by Nikon, from Japan... All metal construction that takes a 52mm filter of ANY lens, yes I said ANY... not only nikon mount lenses (Canon lenses are ideal.. lol j/k) Yes it works perfectly for your current 50/1.8 (52mm filter threads).
You cannot focus, you have to move the camera/yourself around to get good focus. No metering at all, guess your exposure there... No aperture control, aperture is set via the aperture ring. DARK viewfinder. You dont want a f/1.8 DOF in macro as nothing will show up in the pics... you need somewhere like f/11 at least, I used f/16 up there. And it gets DARK! But oh well, I did my own trick to focus down with bright lights. ![]() Last but not least, unprotected rear element of the lens becomes very vulnerable. I keep my cheap plastic snap on cap when using the reverse macro.
Thanks Macka,
Yes indeed this lens is very sharp for the little price charged. My best $100 spent on a lens
YiP - what beautiful photos
![]() mmmm..... if only I could use it with the 105 macro .... ![]() Well done !! Rel Dodging and burning are steps to take care of mistakes God made in establishing tonal relationships! -Ansel Adams
http://www.redbubble.com/people/blacknstormy
Previous topic • Next topic
7 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|