Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.
Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.
Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.
Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.
Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
by Oz_Beachside on Mon Jun 26, 2006 9:03 pm
Hello,
First time down the Great Ocean Road, 12 apostals, and just made it in time to enjoy these pics. PLease critique and let me know how I may improve. Lens flare was anoying, any tips on PP'ing this out in PS7?
I thought I might need a wider lens, but 50mm turned out well, please dont hold punches
http://www.pbase.com/oz_beachside/image/62495536/large
http://www.pbase.com/oz_beachside/image/62495573/large
I love getting colorful shots out of my 50/1.8 and 85/1.8! Great value!
Am really loving the change from 35mm to Digital!
Thanks in Advance,
Oz
-

Oz_Beachside
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 2227
- Joined: Thu May 25, 2006 11:31 pm
- Location: Black Rock, Victoria. D200
by moggy on Tue Jun 27, 2006 12:02 am
First one is a nice shot but a bit too 'blue' but the second does it for me. Both are nicely composed and the light is great.
 Bob.
.
-

moggy
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 852
- Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 6:00 pm
- Location: Castle Hill, Sydney. - Fixed D70s
by tasadam on Tue Jun 27, 2006 12:32 am
I don't know, but my eye seems to be drawn to horizons that aren't level re the first photo. Could it be straightened and cropped perhaps?
Great time of day for the lighting though.
-

tasadam
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 631
- Joined: Thu Dec 16, 2004 10:57 am
- Location: Near Devonport, Tasmania
-
by Oz_Beachside on Thu Jun 29, 2006 12:32 am
thanks
the blue was as per the day, I like it straight from the RAW.
Yes, agree, the horizon is a little crooked, I would adjust if printing, thanks again.
Tell me, what do you think of the soft water ???
-

Oz_Beachside
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 2227
- Joined: Thu May 25, 2006 11:31 pm
- Location: Black Rock, Victoria. D200
by tasadam on Thu Jun 29, 2006 10:19 am
There have been some great examples of soft water on this forum recently, immediately coming to mind was one at Bondi with a photographer above the chains on the rocks, nice water there.
This works too, surprising. I don't often see photos of soft water from a distance - usually used in a foreground eg water swirling around the kelp in the ocean etc. Overall - yes I think it works and I like it.
I would like to see the same shot earlier, with just a tad more light on the feature apostles in the foreground, helping them show their brilliance - maybe as the sun still captures them, but to get the same water effect, This may mean stopping way down and/or ND filters.
The second one is nice and all but the 1st one is my preference.
-

tasadam
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 631
- Joined: Thu Dec 16, 2004 10:57 am
- Location: Near Devonport, Tasmania
-
by Oz_Beachside on Sat Jul 01, 2006 7:40 pm
yes, agree. I thought the same when I got there, as it was nearly a 2.5 hour drive from Lorne, I was lucky to capture what I did. I had 25 minutes when I arrived, until the sun went under, so I guess I had to make the most of what I had. First one just needs a tad more light on the rock faces / pillars. When I took this, it was very dark, so amazed at the colors.
As for the second one, I think this side is best viewed at first sunrise, which must be planned, but thats in the agenda for next time...
thanks
Oz.
-

Oz_Beachside
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 2227
- Joined: Thu May 25, 2006 11:31 pm
- Location: Black Rock, Victoria. D200
by tasadam on Mon Jul 03, 2006 12:04 am
Oz_Beachside wrote:nearly a 2.5 hour drive from Lorne
Holy smokes! I used to do Warrnambool to Melbourne in 2 and a half hours! Have times changed or what...
Though I didn't go Great Ocean Rd in that time.
I have a great shot of London Bridge somewhere, before it collapsed. My favourite, though, is Loch Ard Gorge.
-

tasadam
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 631
- Joined: Thu Dec 16, 2004 10:57 am
- Location: Near Devonport, Tasmania
-
Return to Image Reviews and Critiques
|