Scotch anyone?

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Scotch anyone?

Postby Raskill on Tue Jul 25, 2006 4:09 pm

I just got a light tent, and so, with my trusty lamps (with natural light bulbs) tried it out. I've only had it an hour, so I'm curious as to what people think of this:

Image

The focal point for the lens and DOF was the label, so the neck is slightly OOF.

Anyone care to comment. I spent the best part of an hour photographing rum and scotch. My wife thinks I'm a loon.

All C&C appreciated.

Thanks! :D
2x D700, 2x D2h, lenses, speedlights, studio, pelican cases, tripods, monopods, patridges, pear trees etc etc

http://www.awbphotos.com.au
User avatar
Raskill
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2161
Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2005 12:26 pm
Location: Rockley, near Bathurst, Home of Aussie Motorsport!

Postby Justin on Tue Jul 25, 2006 4:12 pm

sharp as a tack, but the very bright white seems to completely dominate the picture, also as you say the neck and cork are out of focus, I would suggest more DOF. perhaps softening the light somehow?
D3 | 18-200VR | 50:1.4 | 28:2.8 | 35-70 2.8 | 12-24 f4
picasaweb.google.com/JustinPhotoGallery
"We don't know and we don't care"
User avatar
Justin
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1089
Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2005 9:32 pm
Location: Newtown, Sydeny

Postby Jamie on Tue Jul 25, 2006 4:16 pm

I really dont care much for the lighting im afraid.

How did you have the lights set up and how many?

Did you use a cardboard back drop or anything?

The actual picture is nice and sharp but could have done with a little more DOF.
Jamie
D70s - Nikkor 18-70mm f/3.5-4.5G ED - Nikkor 50mm f/1.8D AF - Nikkor 70-300mm f/4-5.6G AF - Nikon SB600
Jamie
Member
 
Posts: 313
Joined: Sat Jun 18, 2005 12:40 pm
Location: Hoppers Crossing, Melbourne <D70>

Postby Paul on Tue Jul 25, 2006 4:20 pm

Well bugger me with rusty spike! :shock:
Glenrothes is a town only 6miles from my home town!
Although I'm fairly sure this bottle was never distilled there :wink:
Nice work mate, a bit too bright for me, maybe tone down the lights at the back to balance it out. :D
Nikon F80D, FM2n
RRS BH-55, 055XPROB
Smugmug
User avatar
Paul
Senior Member
 
Posts: 866
Joined: Tue Nov 23, 2004 8:32 am
Location: Baulkham Hills, NSW, Australia

Postby daniel_r on Tue Jul 25, 2006 4:26 pm

This got me thinking about an article on Strobist about shooting reflective beer bottles - the technique might come in handy for what you're doing.
D.
Daniel_R's Flickr gallery
I shoot with Nikon stuff.
User avatar
daniel_r
Senior Member
 
Posts: 749
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2005 1:58 pm
Location: Canberra, ACT.

Postby avkomp on Tue Jul 25, 2006 4:47 pm

doesnt do much for me either.

the whole idea may be to get a soft even light and no shadows.

this seems dominated by the 2 bright spots in the image

Steve
check out my image gallery @
http://photography.avkomp.com/gallery3
User avatar
avkomp
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2485
Joined: Sun May 29, 2005 8:47 pm
Location: Bendoura NSW - Nikon D5

Postby sheepie on Tue Jul 25, 2006 4:57 pm

After the meeting I just got out of, a scotch or five would go down rather nicely :?

As to the picture, I think the shallow DOF is a bit of a distraction, as is the highlight on the label. It's not a bad effort, but I'd like to see it again (if there's anything left in the bottle) with more in focus, and less of a blowout in the background. The table (?) on an angle across the back is also a bit of a worry.

Sorry - perhaps you just got me in a bit of a bad mood ;)
*** When getting there is half the fun! ***
User avatar
sheepie
Key Member
 
Posts: 3029
Joined: Sun Aug 08, 2004 11:56 am
Location: Picnic Point, Sydney Australia *** Nikon D200/D70 ***

Postby Raskill on Tue Jul 25, 2006 5:01 pm

Okay, so the general concensus is the light is to bright.

Thats okay, tis what I needed to hear. I guess I'll need to move the light sources away from the sides of the tent, which should let the light 'diffuse' that bit more. Maybe have a light coming down from the top also, to help reduce shadowing.

It's all new, so all advice is good advice!!!

Paul, if you can get your hands on a bottle (not mine) try it. The '73 is pretty pricey, but it is the BEST single malt I've had.
2x D700, 2x D2h, lenses, speedlights, studio, pelican cases, tripods, monopods, patridges, pear trees etc etc

http://www.awbphotos.com.au
User avatar
Raskill
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2161
Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2005 12:26 pm
Location: Rockley, near Bathurst, Home of Aussie Motorsport!

Re: Scotch anyone?

Postby gstark on Tue Jul 25, 2006 5:26 pm

Raskill wrote:I spent the best part of an hour photographing rum and scotch. My wife thinks I'm a loon.


So do I. You're supposed to drink it, not photograph it. After an hour, the bottle should bloody well be empty!

Will somebody attack this man with a fridge magnet?

:)


Reduce the amount of backlighting; as others have said, it's too bright and a distraction. Let the light tent handle the background naturally, or else point a light or two towards the back, but from the side and behind, the bottle. But that's really not needed.

Basically, just try one light on each side, just a little in front of the bottle - ie, towards the camera. Something as simple as that should really do the job.

Then, try to aim for a greater DoF - use a solid tripod, slower shutter speed and and your remote , and then perhaps use hyperfocal distance on your lens in order to maximise your use of the DoF.
g.
Gary Stark
Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff
The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
User avatar
gstark
Site Admin
 
Posts: 22924
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
Location: Bondi, NSW

Postby MCWB on Tue Jul 25, 2006 6:20 pm

sheepie wrote:After the meeting I just got out of, a scotch or five would go down rather nicely :?

Hope it wasn't an AA meeting! :lol: :lol: :lol:

Alan: yup, the background highlight kills it for me. The OOF neck doesn't bother me, it just changes the focus of the image to the label and surrounding colour. That's ok by me, but others may prefer having all forward-facing surfaces in focus.
User avatar
MCWB
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2121
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 10:55 pm
Location: Epping/CBD, Sydney-D200, D70


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques