three beach views

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

three beach views

Postby eyusuf on Fri Aug 04, 2006 3:14 pm

Coolangatta beach, Point Danger, Gold Coast, Australia. Critiques will be appreciated. Cheers.

Image

Image

Image
eyusuf
Newbie
 
Posts: 18
Joined: Mon Jul 10, 2006 3:24 pm
Location: Brisbane

Postby ABG on Fri Aug 04, 2006 3:26 pm

Hi Eddy,

Contrast and saturation look a bit over-done on my monitor.
Andrew
User avatar
ABG
Senior Member
 
Posts: 689
Joined: Mon Nov 14, 2005 1:53 pm
Location: Oatley, Sydney

Postby DStrom on Fri Aug 04, 2006 3:34 pm

Eddy,

the 1st and 3rd shots look a bit soft compared to the 2nd.

Not sure about the colour and saturation as my work monitor is not calibrated.

What post processing did you do?
User avatar
DStrom
Member
 
Posts: 273
Joined: Sun Aug 08, 2004 1:38 pm
Location: Erskineville, Sydney - Nikon D300 / D70

Postby eyusuf on Fri Aug 04, 2006 4:41 pm

thanks guys.
i should have mentioned that i added a layer, applied a bit of gaussian blur, and blended them using overlay options. it is my intention from the beginning to create 'soft' looks on these images.
eyusuf
Newbie
 
Posts: 18
Joined: Mon Jul 10, 2006 3:24 pm
Location: Brisbane

Postby DStrom on Fri Aug 04, 2006 6:55 pm

The blur doesn't work for my tastes, I think #1 would be the best of the 3 shots if it was sharper.

As it stands at the moment I think #2 is the best.
User avatar
DStrom
Member
 
Posts: 273
Joined: Sun Aug 08, 2004 1:38 pm
Location: Erskineville, Sydney - Nikon D300 / D70

Postby Yi-P on Fri Aug 04, 2006 7:31 pm

Blur can work good for portraits or dreamy subjects.

But for landscapes, I'd prefer sharper image around.
User avatar
Yi-P
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3579
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 1:12 am
Location: Sydney -- Ashfield

Postby Oscar on Fri Aug 04, 2006 7:32 pm

Hi Eddy, Sorry but these don't work for me either. I think #1 has the best composition but I would prefer it to be sharper.
Cheers,
Mick
User avatar
Oscar
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1305
Joined: Fri May 05, 2006 11:15 am
Location: Panania, Sydney

Postby eyusuf on Fri Aug 04, 2006 11:20 pm

thanks for the inputs guys. it's good to know what others expect from a landscape composition.
eyusuf
Newbie
 
Posts: 18
Joined: Mon Jul 10, 2006 3:24 pm
Location: Brisbane

Postby Oscar on Sat Aug 05, 2006 8:32 am

Eddy, seems we all prefer a sharper shot when viewing landscapes. As you were going for effect perhaps you could start with one of your favourite shots and try a few different hues or b&w. It looks like we all preferred the second shot - even the 3rd one (that appears to be a cut of the 2nd) seemed to lose it's appeal, to me, with the blurry effect.
Cheers,
Mick :)
User avatar
Oscar
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1305
Joined: Fri May 05, 2006 11:15 am
Location: Panania, Sydney

Postby eyusuf on Tue Aug 08, 2006 1:46 am

great advice guys. i'll keep that in mind the next time i'm playing with photoshop..:).
cheers.
eyusuf
Newbie
 
Posts: 18
Joined: Mon Jul 10, 2006 3:24 pm
Location: Brisbane

Postby Steffen on Tue Aug 08, 2006 2:29 am

Maybe it's just me but I find them quite pleasing. Especially the first one. It has a bit the look and feel of a kitsch aquarelle, but seeing this effect achieved in a photograph is intriguing. I don't find the softness objectionable, since there isn't really a main subject as such. Just a nice array of pastels.

I think this has potential and you shouldn't give up on this route too quickly.

Cheers
Steffen.
lust for comfort suffocates the soul
User avatar
Steffen
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1931
Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2005 4:52 pm
Location: Toongabbie, NSW

Postby eyusuf on Tue Aug 08, 2006 10:38 am

thanks steffen. and please don't get me wrong..i won't give up this routine just yet...:D what i'm saying previously is it is good to know what most people 'approve' in a landscape composition and i will take into account these opinions for my future work..:)
eyusuf
Newbie
 
Posts: 18
Joined: Mon Jul 10, 2006 3:24 pm
Location: Brisbane


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques