"ADDED MACRO PIC " ,, Sunset at Lake/Weeds -Old AI

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

"ADDED MACRO PIC " ,, Sunset at Lake/Weeds -Old AI

Postby PALL on Sat Aug 19, 2006 6:23 pm

thanks so much for comment,yeah i did tilted the camera on perpose cuz mostly i shot plants in this tilted position,,

i went out last evening to get some shots with manual focus lens,, 80's AI-s nikkor. this one turned out to be better shot,AI-s lens from 80's.... light meter dont works nor the auto focus"ofcourse" so its kind realy frustr. but i get used to it now ,its realy good lens for precticing photography just like done in old days"suppose".the softness of image is not cuz of photoshop, this is cuz of lens at "wide open 2.8". , if any of you are FILM users you might have known this lens.

Image

I ADDING one more shot with same lens taken next morning,although its MACRO capability is limited too but its not as clear details as dedicated 105mm MACRO lens,,

Image
Last edited by PALL on Sun Aug 20, 2006 1:15 am, edited 2 times in total.
Pall.A.
PALL
Member
 
Posts: 106
Joined: Sat Aug 20, 2005 7:09 am
Location: SKT. , PAKISTAN.

Postby blinkblink on Sat Aug 19, 2006 7:53 pm

I looked at this image for quite some time. Decided that it's a great image, however I did find myself tilting my head to look at it.

Chris
User avatar
blinkblink
Member
 
Posts: 479
Joined: Thu Sep 15, 2005 6:55 pm
Location: Romsey, Victoria

Postby marcotrov on Sat Aug 19, 2006 7:59 pm

Pall great tonal transitions. Smooth. The tilt does cause initial confusion but generally it adds to the graphic element of the image. love the colours too. :)
cheers
marco
marcotrov
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2577
Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:21 pm
Location: Cairns, Queensland, Australia

Postby Justin on Sat Aug 19, 2006 8:42 pm

I am liking your new stuff - the one next to this on your photography page (just to the right) is even better and would be worth a post!
D3 | 18-200VR | 50:1.4 | 28:2.8 | 35-70 2.8 | 12-24 f4
picasaweb.google.com/JustinPhotoGallery
"We don't know and we don't care"
User avatar
Justin
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1089
Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2005 9:32 pm
Location: Newtown, Sydeny

Postby avkomp on Sat Aug 19, 2006 10:17 pm

nice image.
colours work well.

I find the dark horizon a tad distracting but overall like this a lot.

I kept all my old glass. ais

on the d70 you have to guess exposure but one the d200 and d2x you can tell the camera what lens it is and the metering just works.

still gotta focus though :lol:
check out my image gallery @
http://photography.avkomp.com/gallery3
User avatar
avkomp
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2485
Joined: Sun May 29, 2005 8:47 pm
Location: Bendoura NSW - Nikon D5

Postby pippin88 on Sat Aug 19, 2006 10:18 pm

I find the same with the tilt. Great colours etc.

This one is fabulous
- Nick
Gallery
User avatar
pippin88
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1107
Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2005 6:42 pm
Location: Newcastle / Sydney

Postby avkomp on Sat Aug 19, 2006 10:22 pm

agree with pippins comments on the other image too.

that other one is amazing.

well done
check out my image gallery @
http://photography.avkomp.com/gallery3
User avatar
avkomp
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2485
Joined: Sun May 29, 2005 8:47 pm
Location: Bendoura NSW - Nikon D5

Postby PALL on Sun Aug 20, 2006 1:18 am

pippin88 wrote:I find the same with the tilt. Great colours etc.

This one is fabulous


thansk pippin,yea that fallen leaf was good and that day light was realy magical,i sorting up stuff on my site and yeah mostly are new shots but some recovered up too from last year's hard crash,,i will post here next time.

thank you,
bye.
Pall.A.
PALL
Member
 
Posts: 106
Joined: Sat Aug 20, 2005 7:09 am
Location: SKT. , PAKISTAN.

Postby gstark on Sun Aug 20, 2006 9:42 am

I'm sorry, but while there's some nice colours in these images, that's about all I see in there.

In the first, for instance, the foreground subject is in silhouette. That's fine, but it needs greater tonal separation from the dark object in the background.

Similarly, in the second, your foreground subject blends tonally into the background, creating a confusion between the different areas of this subject. I think that greater DoF and a different PoV is required in the second, and in the first, a different PoV, and perhaps some curves adjustments, might be in order.
g.
Gary Stark
Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff
The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
User avatar
gstark
Site Admin
 
Posts: 22924
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
Location: Bondi, NSW

Postby PALL on Sun Aug 20, 2006 10:17 am

thanks gstark,yeah you noticed right.but in first image i wanted it to be as is just more like graphical expression or dreamy than some detailed shot.
i actaly going to take a print out to hang in my room,,

the second one realy messed up cuz this 28mm lens is not suitable for macro.it just rendered all the subject mixxed up with back,i even used f2.8 but still this lens is not suitable i think for macro.

cya.
Pall.A.
PALL
Member
 
Posts: 106
Joined: Sat Aug 20, 2005 7:09 am
Location: SKT. , PAKISTAN.


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques