Dusk at Green Point

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Dusk at Green Point

Postby stubbsy on Wed Aug 23, 2006 10:35 pm

Took these this evening while doing some sunset shooting with André (Radar) and Col (Colcam) at Green Point on Lake Macquarie. Both shots were taken with the 28-70 f2.8.

To see these larger, click a pic.

Image


Image
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything.
*** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
User avatar
stubbsy
Moderator
 
Posts: 10748
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
Location: Newcastle NSW - D700

Postby Geoff on Wed Aug 23, 2006 10:38 pm

Peter - the 2nd one is brilliant, actually they are both very good, however I can see the 2nd one printed, framed and hanging on your wall. Looks like you guys had fun :)
Geoff
Special Moments Photography
Nikon D700, 50mm 1.4, 85mm 1.4, 70-200 2.8VR, SB800 & some simple studio stuff.
User avatar
Geoff
Moderator
 
Posts: 7791
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 12:08 am
Location: Freshwater - Northern Beaches, Sydney.

Postby rokkstar on Wed Aug 23, 2006 10:46 pm

#2 Peter - exquisite.

I've seen shots like this before being sold. THis is a terrific shot, and like Geoff says, frame it and stick it on your wall.

I like 1 but it's not as clean as 2. the imperfections in the water distract my eye from what should be lovely clean eyes.

Top stuff.
Matt
User avatar
rokkstar
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1432
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 4:27 pm
Location: Miserable cold wet England - D200

Postby Glen on Wed Aug 23, 2006 11:18 pm

Stubbsy, love both but like the others prefer two. I can see it being sold with a slogan on it like "If you don't jump in you will never know if you can swim" or something equally stupid :wink:
User avatar
Glen
Moderator
 
Posts: 11819
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 3:14 pm
Location: Sydney - Neutral Bay - Nikon

Postby Kyle on Thu Aug 24, 2006 12:41 am

#2 for me. Absolutely stunning sir :)
User avatar
Kyle
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1148
Joined: Wed May 10, 2006 10:28 pm
Location: Penrith, nsw

Postby Willy wombat on Thu Aug 24, 2006 12:45 am

Stubbsy

Some wonderful images here. I am a big fan of both. I like the dark contrasts under the jetty in #1 but #2 is also a very fine capture.

Cheers
WW :)
Steve (Nikon D200/D700)
My photography website http://wwphoto.redbubble.com/
My photo blog http://www.redbubble.com/people/wwphoto
Please feel free to offer any constructive criticism on my works
User avatar
Willy wombat
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2284
Joined: Mon Jun 20, 2005 10:47 pm
Location: Bentleigh, VIC Australia

Postby Steffen on Thu Aug 24, 2006 2:02 am

Peter, the first one isn't it, it is a beautiful image but it is rather random and lacks the punch.

The second one suffers from your apparent(?) attempt to have the horizon not dead centre. I don't mind centred horizons at all, and I reckon this looks a little half-baked. I had a bit of a play with your image myself and I found that a lot of negative (sky) space at the top and the horizon much further down looks a lot better to me.

(if all this sounds weird, it probably is - posted after my first bottle of red following a week of abstinence due to a soup diet my wife foisted on me...)

Cheers
Steffen
lust for comfort suffocates the soul
User avatar
Steffen
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1931
Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2005 4:52 pm
Location: Toongabbie, NSW

Postby big pix on Thu Aug 24, 2006 8:06 am

great capture and nice light...........
Cheers ....bp....
Difference between a good street photographer and a great street photographer....
Removing objects that do not belong...
happy for the comments, but
.....Please DO NOT edit my image.....
http://bigpix.smugmug.com Forever changing
User avatar
big pix
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4513
Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 11:52 pm
Location: Lake Macquarie NSW.

Postby Oneputt on Thu Aug 24, 2006 8:14 am

I have to say that I am with the others. Both nice images but the second is a standout. Lovely :D
"The good thing about meditation is that it makes doing nothing respectable"

D3 - http://www.oneputtphotographics.com
User avatar
Oneputt
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3174
Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2005 3:58 pm
Location: Stuck in traffic Maroochydore.

Postby stubbsy on Thu Aug 24, 2006 10:12 am

Thank you all for your comments. Interestingly I prefer #1 (adrker & moodier).

Steffen wrote:The second one suffers from your apparent(?) attempt to have the horizon not dead centre. I don't mind centred horizons at all, and I reckon this looks a little half-baked. I had a bit of a play with your image myself and I found that a lot of negative (sky) space at the top and the horizon much further down looks a lot better to me

The cropping of that was a dilemma. I think you're correct I need either more sky or much less - I cropped some sky at the top, but resisted making this a square image. I think I'll go have another go.

I actually have a landscape version of the same shot, but haven't posted it since I know André took some and since I used his ND4 to take the shots AND he was there first, I've left it for him to post those.
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything.
*** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
User avatar
stubbsy
Moderator
 
Posts: 10748
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
Location: Newcastle NSW - D700

Postby Blackspear on Thu Aug 24, 2006 11:03 am

2nd would be my choice but darken up the blues to look more like the 1st.

Cheers :D
User avatar
Blackspear
Member
 
Posts: 136
Joined: Tue Aug 15, 2006 9:22 am
Location: Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia

Postby sirhc55 on Thu Aug 24, 2006 11:15 am

Both beautiful shots Peter but in #2 I would have stood about 3 metres to the left and halfway up the boardwalk to centre the pilings :roll: :roll: :lol:
Chris
--------------------------------
I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
User avatar
sirhc55
Key Member
 
Posts: 12930
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 6:57 pm
Location: Port Macquarie - Olympus EM-10

Postby radar on Thu Aug 24, 2006 3:01 pm

Great images Peter,

love them both but to the point of sounding repetitious, I prefer the second one. I have posted my version here

I must say that I prefer the colours on yours compared to my results. I'll have to give it another go. Tried it with DxO, but I still get the same result as with Bibble.

My only nit pik and I'm just being picky here :wink: :wink: , is that your foreground is not quite sharp enough. Likely due to the aperture you had of f3.3.

thanks for coming out yesterday,

cheers,

André
Photography, as a powerful medium of expression and communications, offers an infinite variety of perception, interpretation and execution. Ansel Adams

(misc Nikon stuff)
User avatar
radar
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2823
Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2005 11:18 am
Location: Lake Macquarie (Newcastle) - D700, D7000

Postby Colcam on Fri Aug 25, 2006 8:24 am

Good images Peter. I like both of these and Radar's versions as well. I have seen this phenomona of two photographers standing together and getting different shots on many occasions and it fascinates me how many differences there can be.
I will post some of mine from this small expedition as soon as I return from holidays and have a rest to recover. :violin:
Col
Photography. The Art of Seeing, Not Just Looking
http://www.frozentime.com.au
User avatar
Colcam
Member
 
Posts: 327
Joined: Wed Jun 14, 2006 10:30 pm
Location: Pomona, Qld.

Postby UNEEQ on Fri Aug 25, 2006 11:01 am

Very nice shots

2nd is my fav
UNEEQ
Newbie
 
Posts: 7
Joined: Thu Jul 20, 2006 3:05 pm
Location: Rowville, VIC

Postby avkomp on Fri Aug 25, 2006 12:42 pm

I am stuck in the middle here peter,

cos I cant decide which I prefer best.

I love em both.

good stuff

Steve
check out my image gallery @
http://photography.avkomp.com/gallery3
User avatar
avkomp
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2485
Joined: Sun May 29, 2005 8:47 pm
Location: Bendoura NSW - Nikon D5


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques