To see these larger, click a pic.


Dusk at Green PointModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
16 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Dusk at Green PointTook these this evening while doing some sunset shooting with André (Radar) and Col (Colcam) at Green Point on Lake Macquarie. Both shots were taken with the 28-70 f2.8.
To see these larger, click a pic. ![]() ![]() Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything. *** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
Peter - the 2nd one is brilliant, actually they are both very good, however I can see the 2nd one printed, framed and hanging on your wall. Looks like you guys had fun
![]() Geoff
Special Moments Photography Nikon D700, 50mm 1.4, 85mm 1.4, 70-200 2.8VR, SB800 & some simple studio stuff.
#2 Peter - exquisite.
I've seen shots like this before being sold. THis is a terrific shot, and like Geoff says, frame it and stick it on your wall. I like 1 but it's not as clean as 2. the imperfections in the water distract my eye from what should be lovely clean eyes. Top stuff. Matt
Stubbsy
Some wonderful images here. I am a big fan of both. I like the dark contrasts under the jetty in #1 but #2 is also a very fine capture. Cheers WW ![]() Steve (Nikon D200/D700)
My photography website http://wwphoto.redbubble.com/ My photo blog http://www.redbubble.com/people/wwphoto Please feel free to offer any constructive criticism on my works
Peter, the first one isn't it, it is a beautiful image but it is rather random and lacks the punch.
The second one suffers from your apparent(?) attempt to have the horizon not dead centre. I don't mind centred horizons at all, and I reckon this looks a little half-baked. I had a bit of a play with your image myself and I found that a lot of negative (sky) space at the top and the horizon much further down looks a lot better to me. (if all this sounds weird, it probably is - posted after my first bottle of red following a week of abstinence due to a soup diet my wife foisted on me...) Cheers Steffen lust for comfort suffocates the soul
great capture and nice light...........
Cheers ....bp....
Difference between a good street photographer and a great street photographer.... Removing objects that do not belong... happy for the comments, but .....Please DO NOT edit my image..... http://bigpix.smugmug.com Forever changing
I have to say that I am with the others. Both nice images but the second is a standout. Lovely
![]() "The good thing about meditation is that it makes doing nothing respectable"
D3 - http://www.oneputtphotographics.com
Thank you all for your comments. Interestingly I prefer #1 (adrker & moodier).
The cropping of that was a dilemma. I think you're correct I need either more sky or much less - I cropped some sky at the top, but resisted making this a square image. I think I'll go have another go. I actually have a landscape version of the same shot, but haven't posted it since I know André took some and since I used his ND4 to take the shots AND he was there first, I've left it for him to post those. Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything. *** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
Both beautiful shots Peter but in #2 I would have stood about 3 metres to the left and halfway up the boardwalk to centre the pilings
![]() ![]() ![]() Chris
-------------------------------- I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
Great images Peter,
love them both but to the point of sounding repetitious, I prefer the second one. I have posted my version here I must say that I prefer the colours on yours compared to my results. I'll have to give it another go. Tried it with DxO, but I still get the same result as with Bibble. My only nit pik and I'm just being picky here ![]() ![]() thanks for coming out yesterday, cheers, André Photography, as a powerful medium of expression and communications, offers an infinite variety of perception, interpretation and execution. Ansel Adams
(misc Nikon stuff)
Good images Peter. I like both of these and Radar's versions as well. I have seen this phenomona of two photographers standing together and getting different shots on many occasions and it fascinates me how many differences there can be.
I will post some of mine from this small expedition as soon as I return from holidays and have a rest to recover. ![]() Col Photography. The Art of Seeing, Not Just Looking
http://www.frozentime.com.au
I am stuck in the middle here peter,
cos I cant decide which I prefer best. I love em both. good stuff Steve check out my image gallery @
http://photography.avkomp.com/gallery3
Previous topic • Next topic
16 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|