Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.
Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.
Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.
Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.
Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
by daniel_r on Sat Sep 02, 2006 7:30 pm
I know a couple of other members here are keen Strobist readers.
I've been following some of the articles and so forth and tried my hand at some simple studio style shots using nothing more than a D2H/50.14 + SC-29 cable and a SB800 and SB600 in a master slave config.
Click for a larger version
#1 - Sublime
#2 - Apples
#3 - Schweppervescence (strobist bootcamp #4 entry)
Comments appreciated 
-

daniel_r
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 749
- Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2005 1:58 pm
- Location: Canberra, ACT.
-
by Oz_Beachside on Sat Sep 02, 2006 8:13 pm
I like #1 - Sublime.
The detail via "catchlights" the flash provides on the water droplets caught me.
Nice color matching, with a variety of textures in the skins of the fruits.
I also like the pure back / blackout. Highlighting the subjects in perfect isolation.
Thanks for sharing.
Oz
-

Oz_Beachside
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 2227
- Joined: Thu May 25, 2006 11:31 pm
- Location: Black Rock, Victoria. D200
by christiand on Sat Sep 02, 2006 8:15 pm
Hi Daniel,
I like the photos.
I very much like the simplicity of the objects in the first two photos.
I like how two limes are accompanying the apples in the first photo.
The colour match between the limes and the apples is great.
The low key is cool and the subject has nice colour and is crisp.
The third photo I also like.
There is action and connection between the lime slice that was dropped into the glass filled with Tonic Water and the bottle.
I'd probably would have removed the top from the bottle in the last photo.
Also thanks for the link:
http://strobist.blogspot.com/
Question: is the low key "just" under-exposure or is there more to that ?
Regards,
CD
-

christiand
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1989
- Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2004 1:36 pm
- Location: Tuggeranong, ACT - Canberra
by Pa on Sat Sep 02, 2006 8:24 pm
hi daniel i like the lighting in the first 2 shots . i think the third photo is a little bit to busy but well lit.
cheers pa
-

Pa
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1139
- Joined: Sun Apr 17, 2005 12:07 pm
- Location: old bar, NSW 2430
by jethro on Sat Sep 02, 2006 9:09 pm
all great images especially No 1
jethro
shoot it real.
look! and see. Shoot and feel
-

jethro
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1006
- Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2004 10:03 pm
- Location: down south, sydney
by blacknstormy on Sat Sep 02, 2006 9:36 pm
Daniel - lovely !!!!!
I had a play with this a while ago, and it is certainly addictive ! The selection of fruit, and 'framing' has been done superbly, #1 heaven, but I adore #2 - the play of the red and green is just beautiful
Well done
Christian - the definition of low key:
Low key pictures concentrate on the darker tones, often conveying an atmosphere of tension or a powerful deep strength. This has sometimes been use for male portraits, though more often a fuller tonal range with hard lighting is used.
Although low key often uses high contrast lighting, most of the subject is likely to be in shadow, with relatively small areas brightly lit. (edit - ripped off the web, but describes it perfectly)
......
so not underexposed, rather, perfectly exposed 
Last edited by blacknstormy on Sat Sep 02, 2006 10:59 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-

blacknstormy
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 2745
- Joined: Wed Dec 29, 2004 3:33 pm
- Location: Ipswich Qld
-
by christiand on Sat Sep 02, 2006 10:34 pm
Thank you blacknstormy,
Thank you for the explanation of low key - I have learned something
Cheers,
CD
-

christiand
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1989
- Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2004 1:36 pm
- Location: Tuggeranong, ACT - Canberra
by stubbsy on Sun Sep 03, 2006 11:55 am
Daniel
These are very good so I'm going to be very picky
#1 - is great, but I'd have liked either both apples with stalks or both without
#2 - stalks again, but more distracting because only 1 is missing.
#3 as already said would be better with the bottle cap removed (maybe with it placed upside down next to the bottle.
I'm impressed with the detail in all of these and really think the low key works exceptionally well. I'd rank these in order as #3 best, #1, #2
-

stubbsy
- Moderator
-
- Posts: 10748
- Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
- Location: Newcastle NSW - D700
-
by marcotrov on Sun Sep 03, 2006 12:16 pm
Very impressive images. Exposure is spot on. A little tidy up with the last. A few less water droplets and as Peter said cap off or exploding off with effervescence
cheers
marco
-
marcotrov
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 2577
- Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:21 pm
- Location: Cairns, Queensland, Australia
by sirhc55 on Sun Sep 03, 2006 12:25 pm
#2 is excellent with fade to black
Chris -------------------------------- I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
-

sirhc55
- Key Member
-
- Posts: 12930
- Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 6:57 pm
- Location: Port Macquarie - Olympus EM-10
by avkomp on Sun Sep 03, 2006 1:39 pm
I like these a lot.
exposure is spot on in the first 2 which are my favourites.
Didnt really notice the missing stalk on one apple til stubbsy showed me.
now, i cant help but see them.
well done.
Steve
-

avkomp
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 2485
- Joined: Sun May 29, 2005 8:47 pm
- Location: Bendoura NSW - Nikon D5
-
Return to Image Reviews and Critiques
|