Playing around with low-key studio

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Playing around with low-key studio

Postby daniel_r on Sat Sep 02, 2006 7:30 pm

I know a couple of other members here are keen Strobist readers.

I've been following some of the articles and so forth and tried my hand at some simple studio style shots using nothing more than a D2H/50.14 + SC-29 cable and a SB800 and SB600 in a master slave config.

Click for a larger version

#1 - Sublime
Image

#2 - Apples
Image

#3 - Schweppervescence (strobist bootcamp #4 entry)
Image

Comments appreciated :D
D.
Daniel_R's Flickr gallery
I shoot with Nikon stuff.
User avatar
daniel_r
Senior Member
 
Posts: 749
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2005 1:58 pm
Location: Canberra, ACT.

Postby Oz_Beachside on Sat Sep 02, 2006 8:13 pm

I like #1 - Sublime.

The detail via "catchlights" the flash provides on the water droplets caught me.

Nice color matching, with a variety of textures in the skins of the fruits.

I also like the pure back / blackout. Highlighting the subjects in perfect isolation.

Thanks for sharing.
Oz
User avatar
Oz_Beachside
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2227
Joined: Thu May 25, 2006 11:31 pm
Location: Black Rock, Victoria. D200

Postby christiand on Sat Sep 02, 2006 8:15 pm

Hi Daniel,

I like the photos.
I very much like the simplicity of the objects in the first two photos.
I like how two limes are accompanying the apples in the first photo.
The colour match between the limes and the apples is great.
The low key is cool and the subject has nice colour and is crisp.
The third photo I also like.
There is action and connection between the lime slice that was dropped into the glass filled with Tonic Water and the bottle.
I'd probably would have removed the top from the bottle in the last photo.
Also thanks for the link:
http://strobist.blogspot.com/

Question: is the low key "just" under-exposure or is there more to that ?

Regards,
CD
User avatar
christiand
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1989
Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2004 1:36 pm
Location: Tuggeranong, ACT - Canberra

Postby Pa on Sat Sep 02, 2006 8:24 pm

hi daniel i like the lighting in the first 2 shots . i think the third photo is a little bit to busy but well lit.
cheers pa
cheers pa

http://pa.smugmug.com

Work it's part of your life.....So make it an enjoyable part of it.
User avatar
Pa
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1139
Joined: Sun Apr 17, 2005 12:07 pm
Location: old bar, NSW 2430

Postby jethro on Sat Sep 02, 2006 9:09 pm

all great images especially No 1
jethro
shoot it real.

look! and see. Shoot and feel
User avatar
jethro
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1006
Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2004 10:03 pm
Location: down south, sydney

Postby blacknstormy on Sat Sep 02, 2006 9:36 pm

Daniel - lovely !!!!!
I had a play with this a while ago, and it is certainly addictive ! The selection of fruit, and 'framing' has been done superbly, #1 heaven, but I adore #2 - the play of the red and green is just beautiful :)

Well done :)

Christian - the definition of low key:
Low key pictures concentrate on the darker tones, often conveying an atmosphere of tension or a powerful deep strength. This has sometimes been use for male portraits, though more often a fuller tonal range with hard lighting is used.

Although low key often uses high contrast lighting, most of the subject is likely to be in shadow, with relatively small areas brightly lit. (edit - ripped off the web, but describes it perfectly)

......
so not underexposed, rather, perfectly exposed ;)
Last edited by blacknstormy on Sat Sep 02, 2006 10:59 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Dodging and burning are steps to take care of mistakes God made in establishing tonal relationships! -Ansel Adams

http://www.redbubble.com/people/blacknstormy
User avatar
blacknstormy
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2745
Joined: Wed Dec 29, 2004 3:33 pm
Location: Ipswich Qld

Postby christiand on Sat Sep 02, 2006 10:34 pm

Thank you blacknstormy,

Thank you for the explanation of low key - I have learned something :D

Cheers,
CD
User avatar
christiand
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1989
Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2004 1:36 pm
Location: Tuggeranong, ACT - Canberra

Postby stubbsy on Sun Sep 03, 2006 11:55 am

Daniel

These are very good so I'm going to be very picky :wink:

#1 - is great, but I'd have liked either both apples with stalks or both without

#2 - stalks again, but more distracting because only 1 is missing.

#3 as already said would be better with the bottle cap removed (maybe with it placed upside down next to the bottle.

I'm impressed with the detail in all of these and really think the low key works exceptionally well. I'd rank these in order as #3 best, #1, #2
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything.
*** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
User avatar
stubbsy
Moderator
 
Posts: 10748
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
Location: Newcastle NSW - D700

Postby marcotrov on Sun Sep 03, 2006 12:16 pm

Very impressive images. Exposure is spot on. A little tidy up with the last. A few less water droplets and as Peter said cap off or exploding off with effervescence :)
cheers
marco
marcotrov
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2577
Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:21 pm
Location: Cairns, Queensland, Australia

Postby sirhc55 on Sun Sep 03, 2006 12:25 pm

#2 is excellent with fade to black
Chris
--------------------------------
I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
User avatar
sirhc55
Key Member
 
Posts: 12930
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 6:57 pm
Location: Port Macquarie - Olympus EM-10

Postby avkomp on Sun Sep 03, 2006 1:39 pm

I like these a lot.
exposure is spot on in the first 2 which are my favourites.

Didnt really notice the missing stalk on one apple til stubbsy showed me.
now, i cant help but see them.

well done.
Steve
check out my image gallery @
http://photography.avkomp.com/gallery3
User avatar
avkomp
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2485
Joined: Sun May 29, 2005 8:47 pm
Location: Bendoura NSW - Nikon D5


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques