Balmoral RotundaModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
9 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Balmoral RotundaSome night shots of the rotunda taken a few weeks ago ...
<img src="http://www.sundstromimages.com/gallery2/main.php?g2_view=core.DownloadItem&g2_itemId=614&g2_serialNumber=1"> <img src="http://www.sundstromimages.com/gallery2/main.php?g2_view=core.DownloadItem&g2_itemId=616&g2_serialNumber=1"> <img src="http://www.sundstromimages.com/gallery2/main.php?g2_view=core.DownloadItem&g2_itemId=618&g2_serialNumber=1">
I agree with Chris here, with one point - would it have been possible to have slightly more room on the right? I feel it is a little cut off as is. Other than that, out of these three, it has the most appeal, and the potential to be a really nice image.
The second one doesn't flow for me - the steps up on the left draw my eyes in that direction, but I am then stopped in the middle of the picture by the other side of the stand. There is nothing that then draws me further through the right side. The last one doesn't work for me - the tree detracts too much. If it didn't cover part of the roof, and acted more as a frame for the image, then I think it would work better. That said, the perspective on the stand is the most pleasing of the three! ![]() *** When getting there is half the fun! ***
Hi Dave, I'm doing some shots of the rotunda in Hobart's St David's Park tonight. I'd be interested in the exposure details of your shots.
Cheers John D3, D300, 14-24/2.8, 24-70/2.8, 85/1.4, 80-400VR, 18-200VR, 105/2.8 VR macro, Sigma 150/2.8 macro
http://www.johndarguephotography.com/
Thanks for the comments everyone, I will keep it in mind next time I revisit Balmoral.
Hi John, I've checked through all the shots of the rotunda and most were taken in bulb mode f8 - 10 at about 38 - 45 sec. NR was turned on. Hope that helps!
Thanks Dave. Sorry it was rude of me not to comment on the images and just ask you a question. I really like 1 and 3. The stairs leading into the image work well. I'd prefer 3 without the branch. A reshoot with a chainsaw should sort that out.
Cheers John D3, D300, 14-24/2.8, 24-70/2.8, 85/1.4, 80-400VR, 18-200VR, 105/2.8 VR macro, Sigma 150/2.8 macro
http://www.johndarguephotography.com/
It wasn't interpreted as rude so no need to worry ![]() As much as I would like to make use of a chainsaw I think perhaps Mosman council might have something to say about it, so next time I will just move the camera ![]() ![]() ![]()
Previous topic • Next topic
9 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|