Night shot.

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Night shot.

Postby meicw on Wed Sep 06, 2006 8:46 pm

Here is a night shot I took using the D70s and the Sigma 18-50 f2.8. Shot has been processed in DxO.
This is the first time I have attempted this, so please tell me where I went wrong and how it could be improved.
EXIF: 28mm, 10 secs, f11, matrix metering, manual.
Regards
meicw

Image
meicw
Member
 
Posts: 389
Joined: Mon Dec 27, 2004 2:12 pm
Location: Melbourne (Reservoir), Canon 5D

Postby stubbsy on Wed Sep 06, 2006 9:08 pm

Nothing at all wrong with this shot for me. Colours are good, nice and sharp and well exposed.

Good to see another DxO convert too. There'll be a full review of DxO in the premier edition of CHIMP.
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything.
*** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
User avatar
stubbsy
Moderator
 
Posts: 10748
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
Location: Newcastle NSW - D700

Postby owen on Wed Sep 06, 2006 9:23 pm

Very nice photo mate.
http://www.ausphotos.com - My Gallery

http://www.doesgodexist.com - a very interesting site.
User avatar
owen
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1699
Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2005 3:21 pm
Location: Nowra, NSW

Postby casnell on Wed Sep 06, 2006 11:14 pm

Does it for me, love the sky contrast with the lights.
User avatar
casnell
Member
 
Posts: 218
Joined: Mon Sep 04, 2006 4:14 pm
Location: Heidelberg/Melbourne

Postby Technik on Wed Sep 06, 2006 11:31 pm

spot on mate! looks a little grainy though, what ISO setting were you using?
D70s/D200; Tokina 16-50mm 2.8; 18-70DX ; 50mm 1.8 ; 80-200mm 2.8D ; SB600 + Stofen Omini Bouncer
Technik
Member
 
Posts: 170
Joined: Tue Dec 13, 2005 8:35 pm
Location: Sutherland Shire, Sydney

Postby Alpha_7 on Wed Sep 06, 2006 11:38 pm

I like it, looks all good to me!
User avatar
Alpha_7
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7259
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 6:19 pm
Location: Mortdale - Sydney - Nikon D700, x-D200, Leica, G9

Postby ado_civon on Thu Sep 07, 2006 12:11 pm

Very nice indeed. I like the sky also turned out good.
It would have been nice to have more water and the city light reflections on it but either way great photo.

What's DxD and what does it do?
User avatar
ado_civon
Newbie
 
Posts: 41
Joined: Tue Aug 29, 2006 1:38 pm
Location: Southside, Brisbane

Postby meicw on Thu Sep 07, 2006 5:56 pm

Thanks for the comments, guys. The ISO was 400. DxO is a raw conversion proramme. Actually it is more than that. If you have the lens/body combination that it has modules for, DxO corrects any lens abberations (including CA.) It has really brought the best out of the Sigma in this shot. In the original, the clock on the tower at Flionders Street station was completely burnt out, but the programme has brought some detail in to the clock face.
I usually set it on auto and let it do its own thing. I think that it gets it right 95% of the time.

Regards
meicw
meicw
Member
 
Posts: 389
Joined: Mon Dec 27, 2004 2:12 pm
Location: Melbourne (Reservoir), Canon 5D


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques