Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.
Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.
Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.
Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.
Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
by Oz_Beachside on Fri Sep 08, 2006 10:06 pm
Yesterday I took my team out on a cruise as a reward, and I took my D70s with my new Beast along, armed with my SB600 atop.
Very pleased with the results of the day, lots of party candids, and nice backdrops.
I like the bokeh I got, particlauraly nice close to its long end at 70mm, this one is f/8 at 65mm.
VERY HAPPY WITH THIS NEW LENS!!! And thanks for the bargains section making them even more affordable!!!
Regards,
Oz
-

Oz_Beachside
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 2227
- Joined: Thu May 25, 2006 11:31 pm
- Location: Black Rock, Victoria. D200
by Yi-P on Sat Sep 09, 2006 12:39 am
Its a very capable lens, you should love and enjoy it 
-

Yi-P
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 3579
- Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 1:12 am
- Location: Sydney -- Ashfield
-
by terminator on Sat Sep 09, 2006 2:47 pm
What new beast are we talking about? 
Termy,
http://www.glennlegge.com
"There are no rules for good photographs, there are only good photographs."
Ansel Adams (1902 - 1984)
-

terminator
- Member
-
- Posts: 164
- Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2005 1:23 pm
- Location: Woody Point QLD
-
by adam on Sat Sep 09, 2006 2:51 pm
Super beast! Very nice! Yes, which beast is this?
-

adam
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 633
- Joined: Sat Aug 19, 2006 5:27 pm
- Location: New Caledonia
-
by Alpha_7 on Sat Sep 09, 2006 2:54 pm
28-70 2.8 if I'm not mistaken, the Nikon of course available for a steal in @ DSLR bargains.
-

Alpha_7
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 7259
- Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 6:19 pm
- Location: Mortdale - Sydney - Nikon D700, x-D200, Leica, G9
-
by Oz_Beachside on Sat Sep 09, 2006 8:58 pm
yes, sorry, its the 28-70 2.8 Nikon, from HK supplies!!!
Wow, love it.
Took some more today of the colorful brighton bathing boxes, and just love the clarity, control, confidence, and color im getting.
Just ordered the 85/1.4, cant wait for that too!!! 
-

Oz_Beachside
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 2227
- Joined: Thu May 25, 2006 11:31 pm
- Location: Black Rock, Victoria. D200
by terminator on Sat Sep 09, 2006 9:20 pm
I`ve heard nothing but rave reviews about this lens.
I`d love to get one but I just don`t know if I could justify the cost for a lens that effectively starts at 42mm on a D200.
Would be a great walkaround lens on a full frame camera but not so sure with the D200.
Is it REALLY that good 
Termy,
http://www.glennlegge.com
"There are no rules for good photographs, there are only good photographs."
Ansel Adams (1902 - 1984)
-

terminator
- Member
-
- Posts: 164
- Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2005 1:23 pm
- Location: Woody Point QLD
-
by Oz_Beachside on Sat Sep 09, 2006 9:53 pm
I read a lot about lenses, and this was my #1 on the list. It has a narrow focal range which minimises compromising on quality.
Its a 77mm front, letting in lots of light/color/detail.
For me, Its one of my first investments in long term nikon glass, so it was a very careful consideration.
For my needs, it covers studio, portrait, wedding type pics.
A quick snap from this afternoon, for color consideration... note rainbow in sky. (it was raining as I took it)
(goto my pbase for large version)
My planned kit is 12-24, 28-70, 80-200, and a 85/1.4
-

Oz_Beachside
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 2227
- Joined: Thu May 25, 2006 11:31 pm
- Location: Black Rock, Victoria. D200
by Geoff on Sat Sep 09, 2006 10:04 pm
We have seen stunning results fromt he 28-70 2.8 of recent times, these are no exception. 
-

Geoff
- Moderator
-
- Posts: 7791
- Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 12:08 am
- Location: Freshwater - Northern Beaches, Sydney.
-
by christiand on Sat Sep 09, 2006 11:44 pm
Dear OZ,
I have recently replaced my monitor and your image looks quite soft to me.
I'm surprised - a collegue of mine who has the 28-70mm f2.8 lens gave me an image of one of his chooks.
That image is SOOOO sharp and SOOOO colour correct - I was amazed - this was on my CRT monitor - now the LCD that I have just runs rings around the CRT - the chook images are now getting to the point of being phantastic.
Best regards,
Christian
-

christiand
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1989
- Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2004 1:36 pm
- Location: Tuggeranong, ACT - Canberra
by christiand on Sat Sep 09, 2006 11:47 pm
Hi Oz,
did you bump up the ISO or did you underexpose ?
Cheers,
CD
-

christiand
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1989
- Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2004 1:36 pm
- Location: Tuggeranong, ACT - Canberra
by Yi-P on Sun Sep 10, 2006 1:43 am
Oz_Beachside wrote:Just ordered the 85/1.4, cant wait for that too!!! 
You will love the 85/1.4 even more.
Im still learning on how to use the lens  Too shy to post samples at this stage
-

Yi-P
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 3579
- Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 1:12 am
- Location: Sydney -- Ashfield
-
by Killakoala on Sun Sep 10, 2006 4:51 pm
The 28-70, like most lenses, is a little soft fully wide open at 2.8f. But it's super sharp everywhere else  There are not many lenses that are sharp at their widest aperture. The 85mm 1.4f is though.
The 28-70 has a proven track record with pro photogs.
Steve. |D700| D2H | F5 | 70-200VR | 85 1.4 | 50 1.4 | 28-70 | 10.5 | 12-24 | SB800 |Website-> http://www.stevekilburn.comLeeds United for promotion in 2014 - Hurrah!!!
-

Killakoala
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 5398
- Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2004 3:31 pm
- Location: Southland NZ
-
Return to Image Reviews and Critiques
|