



Thanks
Alex
Marajoara AFW showModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
8 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Marajoara AFW showAs Wayne (Pirostitch) said: What a week! Very tiering, but exciting and amazing nevertheless. I managed to attend 3 shows which took place as part of AFW in Melbourne. It was a pleasure shooting next to Wendell. Thanks for the lessons and your efforts plus time, mate. Hope you visit Melbourne again soon. I feel dead tonight though. Here are a couple from the Marajoara which is a new swimwear label. The show created a bit of controversy in a media as they refused to use the event models and used amature models instead who better represent general population looking women
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Thanks Alex
The second one is my pick Alex. Composition is nice and exposure seems to be spot on.
The third one would have been better if she wasn't tilted and the rest of her arm was in the shot. Hassy, Leica, Nikon, iPhone
Come follow the rabbit hole...
Hi Alex, I like 2 and 3. Heaps of detail and lovely skin tones. 80-200 I presume. No flash?
The black background and white above #1 doesn't help the shot IMHO. Cheers John D3, D300, 14-24/2.8, 24-70/2.8, 85/1.4, 80-400VR, 18-200VR, 105/2.8 VR macro, Sigma 150/2.8 macro
http://www.johndarguephotography.com/
Great photosI like the third one best, maybe because it has some movement. GReat photos Alex.
hi alex
2nd one is best it looks that sort of tight half length shot looks great, but i think the crop is off it looks wider than the original 35mm portrait size 3rd one is great too because of the movement but i can see why you missed centreing the model in that split second shot, in instances liek that you just have to anticipate their movements that was called swish swashing, usually the pro models turn in one spot and dont move left to right too much during their final pose exposure and timing is great
Thanks for your comments, all.
John: It was Sigma 70-200 actually. That's right no flash - good available light. Wendell and Wayne: It was indeed a pity re arm cut off especially at the joint spot. Alex
Previous topic • Next topic
8 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|