Florriade begins (1/2)

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Florriade begins (1/2)

Postby Willy wombat on Sun Sep 17, 2006 10:02 am

[img]http://www.fototime.com/{370FD660-955A-4EA9-928C-D79C590CDCE9}/picture.JPG[/img]

[img]http://www.fototime.com/{B9089902-C484-41EB-B316-14F3AB42BE23}/picture.JPG[/img]

[img]http://www.fototime.com/{EBC8B291-3D1C-4635-A407-3F43DF8C795B}/picture.JPG[/img]
Steve (Nikon D200/D700)
My photography website http://wwphoto.redbubble.com/
My photo blog http://www.redbubble.com/people/wwphoto
Please feel free to offer any constructive criticism on my works
User avatar
Willy wombat
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2284
Joined: Mon Jun 20, 2005 10:47 pm
Location: Bentleigh, VIC Australia

Postby Yi-P on Sun Sep 17, 2006 11:12 am

Nice, but,
The saturation seems to be recovered from blown highlights.
User avatar
Yi-P
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3579
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 1:12 am
Location: Sydney -- Ashfield

Postby Willy wombat on Sun Sep 17, 2006 12:55 pm

Thanks Yi-P

I had a few problems with exposure yesterday because of the very strong lighting. Also and lot of the flower beds have white in them which are a nightmare.

Thanks for your comments though
Steve (Nikon D200/D700)
My photography website http://wwphoto.redbubble.com/
My photo blog http://www.redbubble.com/people/wwphoto
Please feel free to offer any constructive criticism on my works
User avatar
Willy wombat
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2284
Joined: Mon Jun 20, 2005 10:47 pm
Location: Bentleigh, VIC Australia

Postby paulvdb1 on Sun Sep 17, 2006 6:55 pm

Steve - number 1 looks quite a bit better to me with a little more warmth and saturation - it tends to be a bit punchier with a little less blue in it and more red/yellow. Picking the middle bollard in the background for WB gave a slightly warmer shot.

That said - you may like the shots exactly as they are :-)

I like the composition in #2 - just a bit more interesting than flower beds alone to show that people are actually studying the flowers.
Regards, Paul Vandenberg

D7000 (D70S retired) - 18-70mm, 50mm F1.8, 35mm F2, Sigma 70-300mm
paulvdb1
Member
 
Posts: 128
Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2005 2:22 pm
Location: NW Sydney

Re: Florriade begins (1/2)

Postby MarcL on Sun Sep 17, 2006 7:10 pm

I won't make comments on contrast. Sometimes you try work with the light you have. Others may have more constructive comments regarding working with macro instead (with a shade and/or reflector).

[img]http://www.fototime.com/{370FD660-955A-4EA9-928C-D79C590CDCE9}/picture.JPG[/img]

I like the semi-repeating patterns of flowers in this. Unfortunately the background seems a distraction. I'm not sure if you were meaning to include them, or if they were meant to be the subject, but amongst such colour and semi-ordered chaos they eaither disappear of just confuse that semi-order. I feel that the whole bed of flowers could have occupied the frame by itself, with an attempt to get close to bring focus to a single flower, or at least the leading flowers (somoething to focus - maybe that closest flower - before letting the eye wander around that magnificent riot.

This photo does make me want to be there. That colour, that non-pattern pattern...it just looks fantastic.

[img]http://www.fototime.com/{B9089902-C484-41EB-B316-14F3AB42BE23}/picture.JPG[/img]

I really like you're idea on this one - well-spotted. My urge is to get down lower, in the desire to improve the composition by being with the girl's level of effort, with perhaps, hopefully, the beds filling the background and the gap between her and the first flowers compressed/narrowed by the perspective change (it's hard to judge what would happen to it if you did this - I'm a lot further away than the shot's actuality :) ). The second student might be a little bit distracting - it's the first girl's focus that is the focus of this show - so could probably be cropped as well.

As I say, I really like the idea behind this one. Good stuff.

[img]http://www.fototime.com/{EBC8B291-3D1C-4635-A407-3F43DF8C795B}/picture.JPG[/img]

I see you've spied that wonderful curve. It looks impressive. For me, unfortunately, it goes the wrong way. Lines in photos are sometimes used as "lead in" lines, that lead you in to the photo. For me, this, particularly the path, literally lead you out of the photo, emphasised by the people on the path doing precisely that. It's hard for me to say what would improve that, as I'd have to make way too many assumptions about what was possible with the composition (where you could stand, what else is outside of the frame, etc.).

It's a magnificent curve of colour there you've spotted. I (sincerely) wonder what else could be done with it? (thus my desire to attend, based on your photos :) ).

Of course, you're there - you can just go again, whenever you want (~mumbles~mongrel! ;) ). Maybe if you can find a time with less contrasty light - earlier or later in the day, or even overcast (flower beds work for me best in overcast conditions, though that may be an anchovies -thing :D ).

Cheers,
MarcL
MarcL
Newbie
 
Posts: 15
Joined: Sun Sep 17, 2006 4:41 pm

Postby Willy wombat on Sun Sep 17, 2006 10:24 pm

Great review - I appreciate it - Thanks MarcL

Cheers for your comments to Paul. I will post a few more images from my day out at the festival. If you like flowers, then check them out too.
Steve (Nikon D200/D700)
My photography website http://wwphoto.redbubble.com/
My photo blog http://www.redbubble.com/people/wwphoto
Please feel free to offer any constructive criticism on my works
User avatar
Willy wombat
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2284
Joined: Mon Jun 20, 2005 10:47 pm
Location: Bentleigh, VIC Australia

Postby stubbsy on Mon Sep 18, 2006 2:04 pm

Steve

I can't add much to what's already been said about these images other than to say the second shot is an inspired composition. It tells a much stronger story than just a shot of flowers since we add content as we mentally speculate on what the young girls are doing.
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything.
*** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
User avatar
stubbsy
Moderator
 
Posts: 10748
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
Location: Newcastle NSW - D700


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques